Winter’s sparse palette

Winter’s sparse palette

Photo by Brian Jones on Unsplash

Originally published 13 November 1989

Octo­ber blew through the trees of New Eng­land like a slow hur­ri­cane of col­or. Gone now, all gone, leav­ing behind more brown lit­ter than Hur­ri­cane Hugo. Now the nat­u­ral­ist must seek his col­or in bits and pieces.

The rosy cap of the rus­su­la mush­room hun­kered down under brown leaves. The gap­ing yel­low and scar­let berries of the bit­ter­sweet. The flash of red on the head of a win­ter­ing downy wood­peck­er. Snips of col­or. Bits and pieces. Win­ter is the sea­son of black-and-white.

In her col­lec­tion of essays, Diana & Nikon, pho­tog­ra­phy crit­ic Janet Mal­colm notes that seri­ous pho­tog­ra­phers have tra­di­tion­al­ly favored black-and-white film, and snap­shoot­ers use noth­ing but col­or. Para­dox­i­cal­ly, she says, it is black-and-white pho­tog­ra­phy that requires the pho­tog­ra­ph­er to pay close atten­tion to the world in col­or, while col­or pho­tog­ra­phy per­mits him to for­get it. The one medi­um is hard, and the oth­er easy. The one requires art and the oth­er doesn’t.

And she’s right. Any­one can take a pret­ty pic­ture of New Eng­land in Octo­ber. Just point the cam­era in any direc­tion and snap. The result may be pret­ty, but it prob­a­bly won’t be art. The seri­ous pho­tog­ra­ph­er resists “the blan­d­ish­ments of col­or,” says Mal­colm, pre­fer­ring instead the demand­ing dis­ci­pline of black-and-white.

What is true for pho­tog­ra­phers is also true for nat­u­ral­ists. There’s not much to be learned from Octo­ber’s Koda­col­or spec­tac­u­lar. It is black-and-white win­ter that teach­es us how to real­ly see. Win­ter is the work­shop of the nat­u­ral­ist’s art.

Winter weeds

My favorite of all nature guides is Lau­ren Brown’s Win­ter Weeds. Noth­ing fan­cy, no glossy col­or plates, just del­i­cate line draw­ings of the sub­tle appa­ra­tus­es of thorns, burs, seed pods, calyces, bracts — flow­ers undressed by win­ter, their hid­den con­trivances and secret strate­gies made clear. This is nature for the fine-tipped pen, not the Instamatic.

In her intro­duc­tion, Brown quotes Thore­au on the “state­ly beau­ty” of with­ered veg­e­ta­tion that has with­stood the win­ter, some­times more obvi­ous and inter­est­ing than in sum­mer even, as if the beau­ty of the plants was not ripe until all the gaudy col­or fad­ed. I remem­ber using Brown’s guide to iden­ti­fy the win­ter remains of a plant called blue curls. Not a speck of blue, but tiny paper-crisp flames of brown, like upturned hands. No sum­mer blos­som could be lovelier.

Anoth­er excel­lent guide to the black-and-white world is Don­ald Stokes’ A Guide to Nature in Win­ter. Here is all the infor­ma­tion one needs to read the fine hiero­glyph­ics that stand revealed when autum­n’s Cray­ola scrib­ble fades. The bur­row­ings of insects. Galls and cankers. Aban­doned bird nests. Poly­pores and turkey tails, the win­ter mush­rooms. Tracks in snow. The real goings-on of nature faith­ful­ly record­ed in black-and-white.

Col­or is all the more pre­cious in win­ter because of its scarci­ty. Nature’s col­ors have usu­al­ly evolved for a pur­pose, and the pur­pose is some­times more appar­ent when the col­or is seen in iso­la­tion. The yel­low and scar­let fruits of bit­ter­sweet attract birds, which eat the berries and dis­perse the seeds through their feces. The male downy wood­peck­er’s red badge was pre­sum­ably acquired through sex­u­al selection.

The ele­gant leaves of the spot­ted pip­sis­se­wa, a del­i­cate ever­green plant of the for­est floor, whis­per the great­est tale of all, the sto­ry of chloro­phyll, best heard in the absence of sum­mer’s din. Chloro­phyll cap­tures sun­light and enables plants to feed all life on Earth. The chloro­phyll mol­e­cule absorbs red and blue light from the solar spec­trum, reflect­ing green. The pip­sis­se­wa’s green, vivid on a field of snow, is life tak­ing ener­gy from a star.

October in New England

And what of the crim­sons, oranges and yel­lows of New Eng­land in Octo­ber? What sto­ry do they tell? In autumn, chloro­phyll in the leaves of decid­u­ous trees breaks down and oth­er plant pig­ments — antho­cyanins and carotenoids — come to the fore. Charles Dar­win took note of the autum­nal col­or that makes New Eng­land famous: “The tints of the decay­ing leaves in an Amer­i­can for­est are described by every­one as gor­geous; yet no one sup­pos­es that these tints are of the least advan­tage to the trees.”

Octo­ber’s riot of col­or is appar­ent­ly an acci­dent, an exer­cise in use­less osten­ta­tion on the part of trees, and an embar­rass­ment to evo­lu­tion­ists who like to find a rea­son for every­thing. The crim­son splurge of autum­nal maples is a waste, like the red of arte­r­i­al blood, which, accord­ing to Dar­win, “adds to the beau­ty of the maid­en’s cheek, but no one will pre­tend that it has been acquired for that purpose.”

Octo­ber is a gor­geous but mean­ing­less extrav­a­gan­za. Novem­ber requires close atten­tion to nature’s col­or. In a world of black-and-white we hoard the gold of the kinglet’s cap, the flecked pink of gran­ite, blue shad­ows on snow. In win­ter, we real­ly start to fig­ure out what col­or is all about. Hard work. Octo­ber was easy.

Share this Musing: