Where nature and nurture can’t agree

Where nature and nurture can’t agree

Photo by Taha on Unsplash

Originally published 4 March 2003

NATURE: Well, my friend, you must admit that I’ve had quite the best of it late­ly. The human genome has been sequenced. Thou­sands of human genes have been iden­ti­fied, and hun­dreds more are sort­ed out every month. The flood­gates are open. Every day we learn more about how genes make us what we are.

NURTURE: Don’t be so quick to gloat. It depends on what you mean by “what we are.” I will admit that genes guide the mak­ing of the body. Big deal. The body is an emp­ty ves­sel wait­ing to be filled.

NATURE: I think it was British biol­o­gist William Hamil­ton who said, “The tab­u­la of human nature was nev­er rasa.

NURTURE: Expe­ri­ence, not genet­ics, makes a human self.

NATURE: I agree that we are capa­ble of learn­ing. It is obvi­ous, for exam­ple, that an Eng­lish vocab­u­lary was not part of my genet­ic inher­i­tance. At the same time, it has become increas­ing­ly clear that Noam Chom­sky got it right when he guessed that a lan­guage instinct is inborn, includ­ing basic rules of grammar.

NURTURE: Oh, give me a break. Genes are noth­ing but strings of four kinds of paired chem­i­cals that code for pro­teins, which are them­selves just long strands of amino acids. You expect me to believe that a few chem­i­cals strung togeth­er can make a human self. A Shake­speare, say?

NATURE: Think about it. Shake­speare’s com­plete works are them­selves just com­bi­na­tions of 26 letters.

NURTURE: Unfair! Sure­ly you don’t want me to believe that the words of Ham­let were writ­ten into Shake­speare’s genes?

NATURE: Of course not. But Shake­speare’s genes had a lot to do with his intel­li­gence, sen­si­tiv­i­ty, cre­ativ­i­ty, and facil­i­ty for lan­guage. A writer of Shake­speare’s stature is born, not made.

NURTURE: I’m sor­ry, but it stretch­es creduli­ty to believe that a mere sequence of four chem­i­cal “let­ters” on DNA accounts for a Shake­speare. Or a Sad­dam Hus­sein, for that mat­ter. I would be more inclined to con­sid­er ear­ly expe­ri­ences in their lives — parental influ­ence, edu­ca­tion, phys­i­cal and emo­tion­al nourishment.

NATURE: Increduli­ty has nev­er been a use­ful guide to under­stand­ing what makes the world tick. Think about the devel­op­ment of a human embryo in the womb, start­ing with a sin­gle fer­til­ized cell — the slow emer­gence of a body plan, the tiny fin­gers and toes, the eyes, the mouth, the hand against the mouth. What could be more incred­i­ble than that? And it’s chem­istry, all chemistry.

NURTURE: Incon­ceiv­able!

NATURE: Yes, but true. Every day, sci­en­tists under­stand more about how it happens.

NURTURE: I refuse to believe that our behav­iors are deter­mined by genes.

NATURE: As opposed to what? The envi­ron­ment? Child rear­ing? Lan­guage? Cul­ture? You nur­tur­ists just replace one kind of deter­min­ism by another.

NURTURE: I like to believe that there’s a place in human behav­ior for free will.

NATURE: The human brain has 100 bil­lion neu­rons, each with 1,000 con­nec­tions to oth­er neu­rons, and mas­sive­ly con­nect­ed to the envi­ron­ment. We know from chaos the­o­ry that any com­plex sys­tem, with many feed­back loops, is unpre­dictable in its behav­ior. Tiny stim­uli can result in major con­se­quences. You call it free will. I call it complexity.

NURTURE: Are you sug­gest­ing that we are not respon­si­ble for our actions?

NATURE: Respon­si­bil­i­ty is a cul­tur­al con­cept. Our genes may pre­dis­pose us to cer­tain behav­iors — male vio­lence, for exam­ple — but we are not pris­on­ers of our genes. The brain is a won­der­ful­ly mal­leable organ. Cul­ture helps wire the brain and shape behavior.

NURTURE: If free will and com­plex­i­ty are indis­tin­guish­able, as you say, then I’ll choose the option that ele­vates the human spir­it, lifts us above the ani­mals, and endows us with a divine spark.

NATURE: And I’ll choose the option that endows the entire uni­verse — includ­ing genes — with what you call divinity.

NURTURE: “What a piece of work is a man! How noble in rea­son! How infi­nite in fac­ul­ties! In action how like an angel! In appre­hen­sion how like a god!”

NATURE: If you want a mind-blow­ing intro­duc­tion to genet­ics and human nature, I rec­om­mend Matt Rid­ley’s Genome: The Auto­bi­og­ra­phy of a Species in 23 Chap­ters. The 23 chap­ters, of course, cor­re­spond to the 23 human chromosomes.

NURTURE: No, thanks. I’ll stick with Shakespeare.

Share this Musing: