What our ancestors’ fossils don’t tell us

What our ancestors’ fossils don’t tell us

The fossilized remains of "Nari" • Photo by Akrasia25 (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Originally published 3 January 1994

I’ve been liv­ing with the kid for three weeks. He stands in the cor­ner of my office, dead still, star­ing blankly. I call him Nari.

I’ve grown quite fond of him. He is 11 or 12 years old, a strap­ping youth of about 5‑foot‑3. He would have stood over six feet tall had he lived to maturity.

He has been dead for one-and-a-half mil­lion years.

Nari is a poster boy. His life-sized image graces a poster sup­plied by Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty Press to adver­tise a new book, The Nar­ioko­tome Homo erec­tus Skele­ton, edit­ed by Alan Walk­er and Richard Leakey. It is a hand­some, haunt­ing poster. Nar­i’s almost com­plete skele­ton is posed against a black back­ground. The bones glis­ten with a rich bronze patina.

To my untu­tored eye, the skele­ton looks remark­ably mod­ern. The pro­por­tions of the body are grace­ful, almost del­i­cate. I need only close my eyes and the fleshed-out boy steps for­ward, grin­ning good-natured­ly, hand extend­ed in greeting.

It was because of the poster that I turned to the book. I want­ed to know more about Nari, about his life and his death. Not that I expect­ed much. After all, how much is it pos­si­ble to know about a boy who lived and died more than a mil­lion years ago in what is now East Africa?

A sur­pris­ing amount, it turns out. For one thing, Nari is the most com­plete ear­ly hominid (human ances­tor) skele­ton ever dis­cov­ered. For anoth­er, his bones are among the most intense­ly stud­ied fos­sils of all time. Walk­er’s and Leakey’s book brings togeth­er con­tri­bu­tions by experts in pale­o­bi­ol­o­gy, geol­o­gy, anato­my, anthro­pol­o­gy, and ecology.

It is a stun­ning detec­tive sto­ry, and a sat­is­fy­ing demon­stra­tion of the pow­er of the sci­en­tif­ic method to give flesh to the past.

The experts call him the Nar­ioko­tome boy, after the dry riv­er bed in north­ern Kenya near which he was dis­cov­ered in 1984. His tech­ni­cal des­ig­na­tion is KNM-WT 15000, the acqui­si­tion num­ber of his skele­ton at the Kenya Nation­al Muse­um. But I’ll con­tin­ue to call him Nari, because that is how I came to know him dur­ing the weeks he stood in the cor­ner of my room.

Nari lived in rich grass­lands bor­der­ing a riv­er that flowed near what is the present basin of Lake Turkana. The river’s sea­son­al flood left sev­er­al large swamps that would take most of the year to dry out. The grass­lands and swamps were home to many species of plant-eat­ing ani­mals, togeth­er with their atten­dant preda­tors and scav­engers. Vol­ca­noes occa­sion­al­ly show­ered the riv­er val­ley with blan­kets of ash.

How did Nari die? His skele­ton shows no signs of vio­lence. The only abnor­mal fea­ture is a pock­et of inflam­ma­to­ry gum dis­ease relat­ed to the loss of a tooth not long before his death. Before the advent of antibi­otics half a cen­tu­ry ago, death from sep­ticemia from tooth and gum abscess­es was com­mon. Nari may have died from gum infec­tion after the shed­ding of a milk tooth.

At death, his body either fell into a swamp or was washed into it by a minor flood. For a while it float­ed face down while decom­pos­ing. The body drift­ed a few meters, was trod upon by hip­pos, sucked by cat­fish and chewed by tur­tles. In time, near­ly all of the bones came to rest in a shal­low part of the swamp, became embed­ded in mud, and remained there for a mil­lion and a half years until they began to be erod­ed out of sed­i­ments at the side of a small trib­u­tary of the Nar­ioko­tome River.

In life, Nari was pow­er­ful­ly mus­cled, yet slen­der — a run­ner’s build. He was at the age when he was learn­ing the arts of hunt­ing and gath­er­ing from his elders. Like them, he almost cer­tain­ly pre­pared his prey for eat­ing with care­ful­ly-craft­ed stone chop­pers and scrap­ers. He prob­a­bly used fire.

All of this marks Nari as a true human ances­tor. But there is so much more we want to know, about which the bones are silent. Did he speak? Did he fall in love? Did he grieve for a dead friend? Did he dream?

The authors of The Nar­ioko­tome Homo erec­tus Skele­ton strug­gle valiant­ly with these ques­tions, most explic­it­ly the first. They mea­sure the bones in every pos­si­ble way, com­par­ing them with mod­ern skele­tons. They exam­ine the shape and size of the brain case, look­ing for clues to those parts of the brain known to be cru­cial for speech. They exam­ine the air pas­sage­ways of the nose and throat. They probe the spinal cord for clues to the cen­tral ner­vous sys­tem. Four-hun­dred pages of graphs, charts, schemat­ics, mea­sure­ments, and com­par­isons. In the end, the bones retain their most pre­cious secret: Nar­i’s inner life.

I look again at the life-sized poster. What was he think­ing as he lay at the edge of the swamp, racked by the pain of infec­tion, burn­ing with fever? Did he know that he was going to die? Did he grieve for the life he would not live? Did he cry out at the unfair­ness of a uni­verse that would take a boy in the prime of his life?

If a skull can be said to have an expres­sion, there seems to be a fierce­ness to Nar­i’s face, per­haps even anger. Did he rage, rage against the dying of the light with a ful­ly-human con­scious­ness? Or was he silent, thought­less, not yet capa­ble of hav­ing or of giv­ing expres­sion to thoughts of the ter­ri­ble and the sublime?

I can’t tell you why, but look­ing at Nar­i’s skele­ton, I know that he is me, my bone, my blood, my incip­i­ent dreams, root­ed deep, deep in the evolv­ing mys­tery of con­scious­ness, long ago and far away.

Share this Musing: