We’re more than the sum of our parts

We’re more than the sum of our parts

Photo by v2osk on Unsplash

Originally published 4 October 1993

Charles Sims is in town look­ing for sperm.

Sims is co-founder of Cal­i­for­nia Cry­obank Inc., one of the nation’s largest sperm banks. He has his eye on Cam­bridge for a third office, ide­al­ly to be sit­u­at­ed between Har­vard and MIT. The young men of those uni­ver­si­ties will be flat­tered to know that their ivy-twined DNA is so emi­nent­ly marketable.

If you are in good health, at least 5 feet 9 inch­es tall, and between the ages of 19 and 34, Dr. Sims may be look­ing for you. Donors will receive $35 for each accept­ed spec­i­men up to three times a week. Some time ago, Forbes mag­a­zine inter­viewed a donor to a New York sperm bank who claimed to have made $3,400 a year.

Infer­tile cou­ples are grate­ful for the ser­vices of com­mer­cial sperm banks. Still, there is some­thing pro­found­ly dis­turb­ing about treat­ing human genet­ic mate­r­i­al as a com­mod­i­ty. It is not just a vial of milky flu­id that the sperm bank buys for $35, but the DNA to make half a human. And $3,400 worth of sperm can cre­ate lots of off­spring, a cir­cum­stance that requires of the donor an aston­ish­ing degree of emo­tion­al detachment.

Over the ages, emp­ty pock­ets have prompt­ed many down-and-out­ers to sell body parts and flu­ids. Gen­er­a­tions of poor women sold their hair to wig­mak­ers. The hero­ine of O’Hen­ry’s Gift of the Magi sheared her glo­ri­ous tress­es to raise cash for her hub­by’s Christ­mas gift — an unselfish act that nev­er fails to charm sen­ti­men­tal readers.

Blood has also been a ready source of cash.

But sperm? New med­ical tech­nolo­gies are lead­ing us into an eth­i­cal morass, and frozen sperm is just the tip of the iceberg.

At risk is the com­mer­cial­iza­tion of human life.

Most indus­tri­al nations pro­hib­it the buy­ing and sell­ing of human organs, but as physi­cians become ever more adept at trans­plan­ta­tion the pres­sure is on to bend, break, or mod­i­fy the rules.

The num­ber of peo­ple wait­ing for organ trans­plants is far greater than the num­ber of organs sup­plied by vol­un­tary donors. When demand for any com­mod­i­ty great­ly exceeds sup­ply, good inten­tions and thought­ful rules go by the board.

One body can pro­vide a heart, two lungs, two kid­neys, a liv­er, a pan­creas, two corneas, two hip joints, a jaw­bone, six ear bones, limb bones and ribs, bone mar­row, and a mess of assort­ed lig­a­ments, ten­dons, car­ti­lage, skin, and blood ves­sels. The mar­ket val­ue of the lot is sub­stan­tial, and even live donors can prof­it. We require only one kid­ney; the oth­er might fetch tens of thou­sands of dol­lars on an open mar­ket. A cornea could com­mand thou­sands of dol­lars. A patch of skin is worth hundreds.

A black mar­ket in human organs has the poten­tial to turn Third World coun­tries into body-part depots for the wealthy nations.

If laws are changed to allow the reg­u­lat­ed buy­ing and sell­ing of organs — as some physi­cians and poten­tial trans­plant recip­i­ents sug­gest — enor­mous pres­sure will come to bear on the world’s poor­est cit­i­zens to mar­ket their bod­ies. In the grimmest sce­nario, death would be a wel­come wind­fall for the fam­i­ly of the deceased.

If the sup­ply of organs con­tin­ues to depend only upon the altru­ism of vol­un­tary donors, thou­sands of peo­ple will die who might oth­er­wise be saved by a time­ly transplant.

If reg­u­lat­ed com­merce in organs is made legal, then the last ves­tiges of sacred­ness will be removed from the human frame. The entire body will be as casu­al­ly mar­ket­ed as hair, blood, and sperm.

The Renais­sance poet John Donne said of him­self: “I am a lit­tle world made cun­ning­ly of ele­ments, and an angel-like spright.” He knew there was more to the body’s ensem­ble than organs and flu­ids. One need not believe in dis­em­bod­ied souls to accept that we are more than the sum of our parts. If we aspire to the angel­ic, we should resist the temp­ta­tion to treat our bod­ies as so much mar­ketable meat.

On the oth­er hand, who among us would not be grate­ful for the chance to buy a heart or kid­ney if it would save our own life, or the life of some­one we love? Who would not wel­come the oppor­tu­ni­ty to buy a cornea if it would restore our sight? How many thou­sands of child­less cou­ples are made hap­py by $150 vials of frozen sperm?

In Don­ne’s time, the “lit­tle world” of the body was thought to mir­ror the larg­er world of the cos­mos. From the ele­ment of fire, humans received their sight; from water, taste; from earth, touch; from air, the sens­es of hear­ing and smell. Each organ of the body had a celes­tial cor­re­spon­dence in sun, moon and plan­ets. The human frame was con­nect­ed by a web of cor­re­spon­dences to every­thing that exists, imbu­ing it with a sacred­ness, whole­ness and unique­ness that enno­bles life.

This medieval wis­dom should not be lost as we grap­ple with the moral dilem­mas posed by the new repro­duc­tive and trans­plant technologies.

Share this Musing: