We don’t know everything yet

We don’t know everything yet

1940s Analog Computing Machine • NASA (Public Domain)

Originally published 30 April 1990

Put­ter­ing about in the col­lege library I came across a book pub­lished 50 years ago called Unsolved Prob­lems of Sci­ence. The author is A.W. Haslett, a sci­ence pop­u­lar­iz­er who was wide­ly read in the late 1930s.

I won­dered, how many of the “unsolved prob­lems” can be count­ed as solved today? Here­with, an assess­ment of progress dur­ing the past half-cen­tu­ry, with Haslet­t’s chap­ter titles sug­gest­ing the problems:

  1. The Cre­ation of the Uni­verse. The Big Bang the­o­ry of cre­ation of every­thing from noth­ing about 15 bil­lion years ago looks bet­ter and bet­ter. The dis­cov­ery of cos­mic microwave back­ground radi­a­tion — the after­glow of the Big Bang — in the 1960s con­vinced most sci­en­tists that the Big Bang accounts for the broad out­lines of cre­ation. The dis­cov­ery of quasars and the observed abun­dances of the light ele­ments also fit the the­o­ry for an explo­sive cre­ation. Ver­dict: Sub­stan­tial, excit­ing progress.
  2. Are There Oth­er Worlds Than Ours? The space pro­grams has essen­tial­ly ruled out the pres­ence of life else­where in the solar sys­tem. Despite a vig­or­ous search for intel­li­gent radio sig­nals from oth­er star sys­tems, none has been found. Ver­dict: Still an open question.
  3. The Chang­ing World. Haslett won­dered what forces shape the sur­face of the Earth. No sci­ence has under­gone a more dra­mat­ic rev­o­lu­tion in the last half-cen­tu­ry than geol­o­gy. The the­o­ry of plate tec­ton­ics (some­times inac­cu­rate­ly called con­ti­nen­tal drift) con­vinc­ing­ly explains vir­tu­al­ly every aspect of the chang­ing Earth — moun­tain ranges, ocean basins, earth­quakes, vol­ca­noes. Ver­dict: Solved.
  4. Our Weath­er Caul­dron. Stun­ning break­throughs have been achieved in recon­struct­ing the Earth­’s past cli­mates, with clues com­ing from ocean-floor sed­i­ments and from air bub­bles and dust trapped deep in the Green­land and Antarc­tic ice caps. Super-pow­er­ful com­put­ers enable researchers to mod­el weath­er sys­tems math­e­mat­i­cal­ly. Green­house warm­ing and ozone deple­tion will focus lots of atten­tion on this still unsolved prob­lem in the next decade. Ver­dict: Stay tuned.
  5. Mes­sages from Space. The Earth is con­tin­u­ous­ly bom­bard­ed by high-ener­gy par­ti­cles from space, the so-called cos­mic rays. The big ques­tion in Haslet­t’s time was “Where do they come from?” Some evi­dence sug­gests that many cos­mic rays have their ori­gin in the rem­nants of explod­ed stars, or super­novas, but mys­ter­ies remain. Ver­dict: Unsolved.
  6. The Ori­gin of Man. A half-cen­tu­ry of dig­ging up fos­sils has con­vinced most pale­on­tol­o­gists that humans and apes have a com­mon ances­try, and that ear­ly hominids (human­like crea­tures) wan­dered out of Africa about 1 mil­lion years ago. Recent com­par­isons of the DNA of present-day races sug­gest that all mod­ern humans may have descend­ed from com­mon ances­tors who lived in Africa sev­er­al hun­dred thou­sand years ago. DNA analy­sis will soon add much more to our under­stand­ing of ori­gins. Ver­dict: Solved, but ever so tentatively.
  7. The Begin­nings of Civ­i­liza­tion. Many arche­ol­o­gists now believe that cli­mate change at the end of the last Ice Age was the stim­u­lus that led to set­tled agri­cul­tur­al com­mu­ni­ties. Urban civ­i­liza­tion seems to have evolved inde­pen­dent­ly in three places: the Gold­en Cres­cent of the Near East, Chi­na, and Cen­tral Amer­i­ca. Ver­dict: No big break­throughs and none expect­ed. Just more patient digging.
  8. Is Man a Machine? The dis­cov­ery of the mech­a­nism of hered­i­ty — the dou­ble-helix struc­ture of DNA — must be count­ed as one of the great­est dis­cov­er­ies of the past half-cen­tu­ry. This is the gold­en age of mol­e­c­u­lar biol­o­gy. The mech­a­nisms — ahem — of thought and mem­o­ry remain a rid­dle, despite occa­sion­al bursts of opti­mism by neu­rol­o­gists and arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence researchers. Ver­dict: One thumb up, one thumb down.
  9. The Rid­dle of Sex. The genet­ic deter­mi­na­tion of gen­der in indi­vid­u­als is pret­ty well under­stood. A deep­er rid­dle is why sex evolved in the first place. Biol­o­gists vig­or­ous­ly debate what, if any, advan­tage is con­ferred on a species by sex­u­al repro­duc­tion. Ver­dict: Sex will always be a mystery.
  10. Nature’s Build­ing Blocks. What is the world made of? Using ever more pow­er­ful accel­er­at­ing machines, par­ti­cle physi­cists have achieved remark­able progress in under­stand­ing the ori­gin and uni­ty of mat­ter. Per­haps the most excit­ing aspect of this work is the way our new knowl­edge of the sub­atom­ic realm helps us under­stand the uni­verse on the cos­mic scale. Haslett does not appear to have fore­seen atom­ic weapons, which appeared on the scene not long after his book was pub­lished. Ver­dict: Spec­tac­u­lar progress, but with an omi­nous underside.
  11. Math­e­mat­ics or Com­mon Sense? Is the uni­verse deter­mined by fixed nat­ur­al laws, or is there a chancy, prob­a­bilis­tic basis to real­i­ty? In Haslet­t’s time the philo­soph­i­cal impli­ca­tions of the quan­tum rev­o­lu­tion were hot­ly debat­ed. Ver­dict: The debate goes on, though not so hotly.
  12. The Secret of Strength. The the­o­ret­i­cal strength of bonds between atoms sug­gests that steel gird­ers and air­plane wings should be stronger than they are. What is the source of the weak­ness? Fifty years ago the fin­ger of sus­pi­cion point­ed to invis­i­ble imper­fec­tions in the crys­talline struc­ture of mate­ri­als, and to some­thing Haslett called “met­als get­ting tired.” Recent avi­a­tion dis­as­ters sug­gest that met­al fatigue remains a prob­lem. Ver­dict: Lots of progress in mate­ri­als research, but air­planes still fall apart.
Share this Musing: