Waiting in the dark

Waiting in the dark

Enlightenment visionary Thomas Jefferson

Originally published 13 January 1997

The Enlight­en­ment has been tak­ing its knocks lately.

New Age and aca­d­e­m­ic crit­ics of sci­ence assure us that the Enlight­en­ment has run its course, that the 18th cen­tu­ry’s supreme con­fi­dence in the ratio­nal pow­ers of the human mind was mere hubris. We are enter­ing a post-Enlight­en­ment age, they say, when sci­ence will be demot­ed to drudge step­sis­ter of technology.

In place of sci­ence will come knowl­edge that is sub­jec­tive, not objec­tive, qual­i­ta­tive, not quan­ti­ta­tive, avail­able to every­one, not just to a sci­en­tif­ic elite, faith-based and non-empir­i­cal. In this new order, the pri­ma­cy of sci­ence will give way to a mul­ti­plic­i­ty of ego-cen­tered knowl­edge sys­tems, all of which will be con­sid­ered equal­ly authoritative.

Thomas Jef­fer­son must be turn­ing in his grave.

Jef­fer­son was the embod­i­ment of the Enlight­en­ment, and archi­tect of the Amer­i­can exper­i­ment in Enlight­en­ment democ­ra­cy. In place of the autoc­ra­cies and theoc­ra­cies of Europe, he imag­ined a nation found­ed upon self-evi­dent truths of rea­son, among which stand the nat­ur­al equal­i­ty of all men and the deriva­tion of the pow­ers of gov­ern­ments from the con­sent of the governed.

Jef­fer­son was not a per­fect man, and his notion of nat­ur­al equal­i­ty did not extend to his own Black slaves, but by and large the nation has been well served by his vision­ary con­fi­dence in the ame­lio­rat­ing pow­er of reason.

He envi­sioned a vast empire of equals, extend­ing from coast to coast, gov­erned by con­sen­sus, enno­bled and enriched by the boun­ty of the land.

To fur­ther this end, Jef­fer­son con­ceived and caused to be exe­cut­ed a bold jour­ney of dis­cov­ery across the ter­ra incog­ni­ta of the Amer­i­can West, from the Mis­sis­sip­pi to the Pacif­ic. He chose his per­son­al sec­re­tary Meri­wether Lewis as leader of the expe­di­tion; Lewis chose William Clark to share the command.

Every Amer­i­can school­child learns about the Lewis and Clark expe­di­tion. Few learn how pro­found­ly the expe­di­tion was ground­ed in the ideals of Enlight­en­ment science.

The jour­ney up the Mis­souri Riv­er and down the Colum­bia Riv­er was no mere exer­cise in impe­ri­al­ist land-grab­bing. A quest for empire, yes, but Jef­fer­son also wished to add to the store of human knowl­edge. Objec­tive, quan­ti­ta­tive sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge, he believed, was the dri­ving engine of the pub­lic weal.

It was there­fore essen­tial that the cap­tain of the expe­di­tion be a skilled nat­u­ral­ist. Lewis’ sci­en­tif­ic edu­ca­tion began at Jef­fer­son­’s din­ner table, where he took his meals with the pres­i­dent and his quests. Con­ver­sa­tion was as like­ly as not to turn on nat­ur­al his­to­ry, astron­o­my, geog­ra­phy, min­er­al­o­gy, nat­ur­al phi­los­o­phy (which we now call physics), and the habits and lan­guages of the native North Americans.

Lewis was a quick learn­er. He had the run of Jef­fer­son­’s remark­able library and col­lec­tion of maps. Jef­fer­son him­self was as broad­ly knowl­edge­able a teacher as might be found in America.

Once Lewis accept­ed his com­mis­sion to lead the expe­di­tion, there fol­lowed a peri­od of inten­sive sci­en­tif­ic train­ing, includ­ing the use of the sex­tant, chronome­ter, tele­scope, and oth­er instru­ments. He was taught by experts how to col­lect and pre­serve spec­i­mens of plants and ani­mals he would encounter along the way.

In Philadel­phia, Lewis gath­ered a trav­el­ing library, which includ­ed such works as Bar­ton’s Ele­ments of Botany, Kir­wan’s Ele­ments of Min­er­al­o­gy, and The Nau­ti­cal Almanac and Astro­nom­i­cal Ephemeris. He went into the wilder­ness bet­ter equipped for sci­en­tif­ic dis­cov­ery than any explor­er before him.

As Lewis’ biog­ra­ph­er Stephen Ambrose writes: “There was no hint of encour­ag­ing explo­ration for its own sake or mere­ly to sat­is­fy curios­i­ty about what was out there. This was a true Enlight­en­ment venture.”

And what a grand adven­ture it was, full of hard­ship, hero­ics, mis­ad­ven­ture, mis­chief, tri­umph, and tragedy. It encap­su­lat­ed all of the defin­ing char­ac­ter­is­tics of Amer­i­can civ­i­liza­tion, good and bad. And behind it all, at every moment and in every place, stood the spir­it of Jefferson.

Amer­i­can sci­ence and Amer­i­can democ­ra­cy stemmed from the same root: a con­fi­dence in the good­ness and right­ness of nature, and in the pow­er of the human mind to right­ly order the affairs of men. For Jef­fer­son, the Divine Will was not evi­denced in kings and prelates, but in the nat­ur­al order, to be made evi­dent by patient obser­va­tion and exper­i­ment. His great­est exper­i­ment was the Nation, pros­per­ous, free and indi­vis­i­ble, stretch­ing from sea to shin­ing sea.

As Meri­wether Lewis entered into his jour­nal each day’s obser­va­tions of birds, plants, native lan­guages, and geog­ra­phy hith­er­to unknown to sci­ence, he knew he was part of that exper­i­ment, accu­mu­lat­ing what Jef­fer­son called “use­ful knowl­edge” — use­ful to the build­ing of a civ­il and demo­c­ra­t­ic society.

And now we are told that the Enlight­en­ment exper­i­ment is com­ing to an end. If so, we can only wait and see whether what­ev­er replaces it will con­tribute more to the nation’s life, lib­er­ty, and the pur­suit of hap­pi­ness than did the guid­ing prin­ci­ples of Thomas Jef­fer­son and Meri­wether Lewis.

Share this Musing: