To light the fire of science, start with some fantasy and wonder

To light the fire of science, start with some fantasy and wonder

W. W. Denslow illustration from "The Wonderful WIzard of Oz" (1900)

Originally published 21 December 1992

Every year about this time I am asked by friends and col­leagues to rec­om­mend good sci­ence books for kids, to fill the remain­ing hol­lows in San­ta’s pack.

There are lots of ter­rif­ic sci­ence books out there, and a good place to find them is the chil­dren’s book sec­tion of the Muse­um of Sci­ence shop. But my advice to par­ents is: Don’t be over­ly wor­ried about pro­vid­ing sci­ence books for your kids. Expose them to good chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture and the sci­ence will take care of itself.

Over the years I have often made ref­er­ence to chil­dren’s books in this col­umn, includ­ing the non­sense books of Dr. Seuss, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry’s The Lit­tle Prince, Lewis Car­rol­l’s Alice in Won­der­land and Through the Look­ing-glass, Frank Baum’s Wiz­ard of Oz, Ken­neth Gra­hame’s The Wind in the Wil­lows, and Felix Salten’s Bam­bi.

All of these in essays about science.

What’s the connection?

Chil­dren’s books cap­ture the curi­ous, will­ing-to-be-sur­prised, “let’s pre­tend” qual­i­ty of good sci­ence. Chil­dren’s books are full of the play­ful­ness that is part of all first-rate sci­ence. And, like sci­ence, chil­dren’s books insist upon the real­i­ty of the unseen.

Sci­ence books for chil­dren are packed full of inter­est­ing infor­ma­tion. What most of these books do not con­vey is the sto­ry of how the infor­ma­tion was obtained, why we under­stand it to be true, and how it might embell­ish the land­scape of the mind. For many chil­dren — and adults too — sci­ence is infor­ma­tion, a mass of facts. But facts are not sci­ence any more than a table is carpentry.

Sci­ence is an atti­tude toward the world — curi­ous, skep­ti­cal, undog­mat­ic, and sen­si­tive to beau­ty and mys­tery. The best sci­ence books for chil­dren are the ones which con­vey these atti­tudes. They are not nec­es­sar­i­ly the books labeled “sci­ence.”

From a “sci­ence” book we might learn that a fly­ing bat might snap up 15 insects per minute, or that the fre­quen­cy of its squeal can range as high as 50,000 cycles per sec­ond. Use­ful infor­ma­tion, yes.

But con­sid­er the infor­ma­tion in this poem from Ran­dall Jar­rel­l’s The Bat-Poet:

A bat is born
Naked and blind and pale.
His mother makes a pocket of her tail
And catches him. He clings to her long fur
By his thumbs and toes and teeth.
And then the mother dances through the night
Doubling and looping, soaring, somersaulting---
Her baby hangs on underneath.

Oh what won­drous infor­ma­tion! Even the rhythm of the poem (“naked and blind and pale”; “thumbs and toes and teeth”) mim­ics the flight of moth­er and child, dou­bling and loop­ing in the night.

More:

The mother eats the moths and gnats she catches
In full flight; in full flight
The mother drinks the water of the pond
She skims across. Her baby hangs on tight.

That won­der­ful line — “In full flight; in full flight” — con­veys the sin­gle most impor­tant fact about bats: their extra­or­di­nary avi­a­tor skills. Jar­rel­l’s repeat­ed phrase con­veys use­ful facts about chi­ropter­an din­ing; it also lets the child feel in her bones what it is to be a bat.

In Jar­rel­l’s book, the Bat-Poet recites his poem about bats to a chip­munk. After­wards, he asks, “Did you like the poem?”

The chip­munk replies, “Oh, of course. Except I for­got it was a poem. I just kept think­ing how queer it must be to be a bat.”

The Bat-Poet says, “No, it’s not queer. It’s wonderful.”

That’s what good chil­dren’s lit­er­a­ture does — makes us feel the queer­ness and won­der­ful­ness of nature. It’s the best pos­si­ble intro­duc­tion to science.

Albert Ein­stein wrote: “When I exam­ine myself and my meth­ods of thought, I come to the con­clu­sion that the gift of fan­ta­sy has meant more to me than any tal­ent for abstract, pos­i­tive think­ing.” The best time — per­haps the only time — to acquire the gift of fan­ta­sy is child­hood. We live in an age of infor­ma­tion. Too much infor­ma­tion can swamp the boat of won­der, espe­cial­ly for a child. What chil­dren need is not more infor­ma­tion, but fantasy.

Ein­stein also wrote: “The most beau­ti­ful expe­ri­ence we can have is the mys­te­ri­ous. It is the fun­da­men­tal emo­tion which stands at the cra­dle of all true art and true sci­ence.” At first, this might seem a strange thought. We are fre­quent­ly asked to believe that sci­ence is the antithe­sis of mys­tery. Noth­ing could be fur­ther from the truth. Mys­tery invites the atten­tion of the curi­ous mind. Unless we per­ceive the world as mys­te­ri­ous, we will nev­er be curi­ous about what makes it tick.


Excerpt from The Bat-Poet by Ran­dall Jar­rell reprint­ed with per­mis­sion of Macmil­lan Pub­lish­ing Com­pa­ny. Copy­right © Macmil­lan Pub­lish­ing Com­pa­ny 1964.

Share this Musing: