Time for a new Origin of Species

Time for a new Origin of Species

Model of a DNA molecule • Photo by CGP Grey (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 6 February 2001

The mid-19th cen­tu­ry was fos­sil time in science.

Find­ing fos­sils was all the rage, by pro­fes­sion­al sci­en­tists and ama­teur nat­u­ral­ists. With­in a few decades, tens of thou­sands of fos­sil ani­mals and plants had been named and clas­si­fied. Some were sim­i­lar to liv­ing organ­isms. Oth­ers were strik­ing­ly different.

Of course, fos­sils had been a source of spec­u­la­tion since antiq­ui­ty. But the Indus­tri­al Rev­o­lu­tion and Euro­pean expan­sion around the globe opened up rocks for exam­i­na­tion as nev­er before — mines, roads, rail­roads, canals. The rocks were replete with fos­sils. Thomas Hux­ley’s biog­ra­ph­er, Adri­an Desmond, said: “It was the equiv­a­lent of find­ing a new con­ti­nent of crea­tures, underground.”

The flood of fos­sils called for under­stand­ing. There was sim­ply no way to wedge this sprawl­ing con­ti­nent of extinct crea­tures into the tidy para­graphs of Gen­e­sis. Per­haps nev­er before in his­to­ry had so much intractable knowl­edge been acquired so quickly.

Then, in 1859, Charles Dar­win pub­lished his great book and turned the world upside down. The uni­ty of life by com­mon descent over geo­log­ic time gave pale­on­tol­o­gists the con­cep­tu­al frame­work they need­ed to make sense of the fos­sils. Sud­den­ly every­thing fell into place; the scat­tered jig­saw pieces fit togeth­er to make a love­ly picture.

Hux­ley had seen the impli­ca­tions of the fos­sils. He wrote: “To the very root and foun­da­tion of his nature, man is one with the rest of the organ­ic world.”

Some­thing sim­i­lar is hap­pen­ing today, anoth­er flood of bio­log­i­cal data, anoth­er hid­den con­ti­nent revealed, this time not in the rocks but in the cells of liv­ing organisms.

It’s genome time in science.

In every cell of every organ­ism are mol­e­cules of DNA, chem­i­cal spi­ral stair­cas­es in which each tread is one of four pairs of chem­i­cal sub­units called bases, dubbed A‑T, T‑A, G‑C, and C‑G. The same “four-let­ter” code is com­mon to every liv­ing organ­ism; it is the sequence of the four let­ters that makes one crea­ture dif­fer­ent from another.

Strings of base pairs along the DNA are the genes that make the pro­teins that make our minds and bod­ies work. The sum of all the genes is an organ­is­m’s genome. The human genome con­tains sev­er­al bil­lion base pairs, and some­thing like 100,000 genes cod­ing for 100,000 dif­fer­ent kinds of pro­teins. A fruit fly­’s genome is less than a tenth that size. A bac­teri­um’s genome might be only a thou­sandth as big as a human’s.

A year ago, the genome of only one mul­ti-cell organ­ism, a tiny worm called Caenorhab­di­tis ele­gans, had been sequenced. Today, we have sequences for the human, the fruit fly, and two plants, includ­ing, most recent­ly, rice. Oth­er ani­mals and plants will be sequenced soon. The data bases are over­flow­ing with As, Cs, Gs and Ts.

None of this would have been pos­si­ble with­out the cyber equiv­a­lent of the Indus­tri­al Rev­o­lu­tion. Fran­cis Collins, direc­tor of the Nation­al Human Genome Research Insti­tute, is quot­ed in the jour­nal Nature: “The stage is set for a full scale explo­ration of the ways in which this dis­arm­ing­ly sim­ple one-dimen­sion­al instruc­tion book is con­vert­ed into the four dimen­sions of space and time that char­ac­ter­ize liv­ing organisms.”

Collins puts his fin­ger on the aston­ish­ing sig­nif­i­cance of the genom­ic rev­o­lu­tion: The way in which the almost infi­nite com­plex­i­ty of life emerges from a mol­e­c­u­lar code of mind-bog­gling simplicity.

It is not enough for the DNA to spin off pro­teins. It must spin off the right pro­teins at the right time and in the right place in the life cycle of an organ­ism, and do so reli­ably through­out the life of the organ­ism. As I sit here typ­ing, all of that won­der­ful mol­e­c­u­lar machin­ery is spin­ning and weav­ing in every cell of my body.

Ulti­mate­ly, the for­ma­tion of thoughts in my head as I type and the mov­ing of my fin­gers on the key­board of my lap­top depend upon an unceas­ing whirl­wind of chem­i­cal activ­i­ty that I can’t see or feel, and that until recent­ly we knew noth­ing about.

And we still don’t know a lot about it. The more we learn about how bio­log­i­cal com­plex­i­ty aris­es from mol­e­c­u­lar sim­plic­i­ty, the more I get the sense that nature is try­ing to tell us some­thing we don’t yet know, per­haps some­thing as rad­i­cal­ly new as Dar­win’s glo­ri­ous vision of the uni­ty of life.

Dur­ing the com­ing weeks, months and years, the tor­rent of genom­ic infor­ma­tion will con­tin­ue, not just sequences of As, Ts, Gs and Cs, but also an under­stand­ing of the pro­teins they code for and how the pro­teins work. Ever-more-pow­er­ful com­put­ers will tease out pat­terns that elude human recog­ni­tion, and maybe — just maybe — a new Ori­gin of Species is in the offing.

The genom­ic rev­o­lu­tion has made it more clear than ever that “to the very root and foun­da­tion of his nature man is one with the rest of the organ­ic world.” Per­haps we will now learn some­thing sur­pris­ing about those roots and foundations.

Share this Musing: