The zombies of the plant world

The zombies of the plant world

Indian-pipe • Photo by Will Brown (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 5 October 1987

It’s been a bumper year for Indi­an-pipes. I can’t recall anoth­er time when I have seen so many. Even as I write, in late Sep­tem­ber, they are still com­mon in the pine-oak woods, push­ing up through the leaf lit­ter on the for­est floor, lit­tle covens of waxy-white wild­flow­ers, ghost­ly, bewitch­ing, vague­ly demonic.

Corpse-plant, ghost-flower, ice-plant: Oth­er names for Indi­an-pipe con­vey that same spooky, cold-as-death impres­sion. No gaudy petals, not a tinge of green: the Indi­an-pipe sim­ply does­n’t fit our idea of what a wild­flower should be. The casu­al observ­er might take the plant to be a fun­gus, some sort of bulb-capped mush­room cast­ing spores on the wind.

But wild­flower it is, a true, seed-pro­duc­ing, vas­cu­lar plant, almost unique among our com­mon plants in that it has no chloro­phyll. Col­or­less in every part, or per­haps with just a hint of pink in the flower head, Indi­an-pipe lacks the green pig­ment that enables oth­er wild­flow­ers to absorb ener­gy from sun­light. It must there­fore live off food pro­duced by oth­er plants. Like a mush­room, it derives its sus­te­nance from decay­ing veg­etable mat­ter on the for­est floor.

Parasite on a parasite

In place of the usu­al root sys­tem, the the Indi­an-pipe main­tains a cozy under­ground rela­tion­ship with a fun­gus. The fun­gus assists the plant by break­ing down organ­ic mat­ter in the soil. In a sense, the Indi­an-pipe is a par­a­site on a par­a­site, twice removed from the light of the sun. It is this inde­pen­dence of sun­light that allows the plant to thrive in the shadows.

These specter-like, par­a­sit­i­cal flow­ers have inspired in their behold­ers a dark range of sen­ti­ments. A typ­i­cal reac­tion can be found in Nelt­je Blan­chan’s book on wild­flow­ers from ear­ly in this cen­tu­ry. From the wraith­like Indi­an-pipe Blan­chan draws a turgid moral tale. The plant, he writes, stands as a brand­ed sin­ner: “Doubt­less its ances­tors were indus­tri­ous, hon­est crea­tures, seek­ing their food in the soil, and digest­ing it with the help of leaves filled with good green mat­ter [chloro­phyll] on which vir­tu­ous veg­e­ta­tive life depends; but some ances­tral knave elect­ed to live by pira­cy, to drain the already digest­ed food of its neighbors.”

So far, Blan­chan is on the mark. Botanists tell us that Indi­an-pipe is a mem­ber of the win­ter­green fam­i­ly of plants, not far removed from the heaths, and there­fore a rel­a­tive of such wood­land favorites as rhodo­den­dron, aze­lea, and lau­rel — stur­dy, hon­est crea­tures all. How botanists man­age to find much in com­mon between the col­or­less, par­a­sit­i­cal Indi­an-pipes and those glossy-green, flower-bedecked shrubs must seem a mys­tery, a bit of voodoo tax­on­o­my. But sure enough, all of these plants share cer­tain defin­ing char­ac­ter­is­tics — radi­al­ly sym­met­ric flow­ers, supe­ri­or ovaries, four or five petals usu­al­ly fused, fruit a cap­sule or berry, and so forth — in spite of their super­fi­cial dissimilarities.

It is eas­i­er to see a like­ness between Indi­an-pipe its close cousins of the wood­land floor, the win­ter­green and the pip­sis­se­wa, but even here the resem­blance is like that between a liv­ing, breath­ing human being and a zom­bie. Indi­an-pipe has sur­ren­dered its col­or. Its leaves have degen­er­at­ed into scaly bracts. Says Blan­chan: No won­der this back­slid­er hangs its head; no won­der it grows black with shame on being picked, as if its wicked­ness were only then just discovered.

Something to admire

Nelt­je Blan­chan finds only one thing to admire in Indi­an-pipe: “When the minute, innu­mer­able seeds begin to form, it proud­ly rais­es its head erect, as if con­scious that it had per­formed the one right­eous act of its life.”

Thore­au was per­haps more char­i­ta­ble in see­ing in the clump of Indi­an-pipes a gath­er­ing a maid­ens, robed in pure white, nur­tured in a dark under­ground clois­ter, and now mak­ing their entrance into the world of light. Under their white hoods and capes (writes Thore­au) the vir­tu­ous sis­ters strive to con­ceal their naked­ness and ten­der­ness. But soon, exposed to light and air, their virtue is turned black. Thore­au’s image is archa­ic and overblown, but accu­rate. Once fer­til­ized, the nod­ding white flower of the Indi­an-pipe turns erect and the plant becomes tough and black. The cap­sule at the top of the mature plant splits down the sides and the seeds are spilt to the wind.

We are apt to smile at the way ear­ly nature writ­ers like Thore­au and Blan­chan dis­cov­ered moral lessons among the crea­tures of the for­est floor. But the bizarre biol­o­gy of Indi­an-pipe seems to call for the flam­boy­ant metaphor. Its white­ness begs for a gen­er­ous help­ing of pur­ple prose. Ghoul, phan­tom, ecto­plas­mic spook: These are the words that jump to mind.

The Indi­an-pipe hard­ly deserves its rep­u­ta­tion as grave-rob­ber and spook. The plant is sure­ly no more or less despi­ca­ble than any oth­er wild­flower par­a­site — pine­sap, beech-drops, broom-rape, or dod­der — and con­sid­er­ably pret­ti­er than most. In this day when the recy­cling of waste and the fru­gal use of ener­gy resources are con­sid­ered hon­or­able activ­i­ties, the Indi­an-pipe can­not be fault­ed for squeez­ing a mod­est liv­ing out of the squan­dered residue of summer.

In sum­mer, green­ness is cheap,” said Thore­au. Plants with chloro­phyll can afford to be spend­thrifts. The Indi­an-pipe is one of nature’s ways of pinch­ing pennies.

Share this Musing: