The whale’s tale stirs imaginations

The whale’s tale stirs imaginations

Photo by Gabriel Dizzi on Unsplash

Originally published 15 January 2002

What is it about whales?

Why do we love them so? Peo­ple will trav­el far and risk sea­sick­ness to see their shiny backs breach the waves. We paint their images on the sides of build­ings, buy innu­mer­able posters show­ing them aswim in their ele­ment. It is not just the colos­sal size of the largest whales that fas­ci­nates us; we gasp with joy at the sight of por­pois­es and dol­phins, too. The whole fam­i­ly of cetaceans — the seago­ing mam­mals — have our affections.

We love their sleek wet­suit skin, their stream­lined form. We love their mas­sive dig­ni­ty. A blue whale has a half-ton heart, 8 tons of blood, and con­sumes a mil­lion calo­ries a day. So much life, lived with such grace.

There’s some­thing more. We rec­og­nize a kin­ship. The whales are air- breath­ing, warm-blood­ed, live-birthing, pup-nurs­ing cousins. Their brains, some of them, are big­ger than our own. We har­bor the per­sis­tent, if unfound­ed, sus­pi­cion that they may be smarter than us. They spend more time play­ing than search­ing for food. They have few ene­mies (oth­er than humans). They spend their lives mak­ing love and music.

They seem to live in a prelap­sar­i­an inno­cence, a Zen-like state of tran­quil­i­ty. When a whale lifts its body above the waves and we glimpse its steely eye, it seems to be regard­ing us with a kind­ly con­de­scen­sion, although that impres­sion sure­ly tells us more about our­selves than about whales. It would be won­der­ful to know what goes on inside their huge brains: Do they feel affec­tion, plea­sure, fun? Do they respond to beau­ty? Do they ever won­der in some dim pre­con­scious way why it is that we will go to almost any length to save them when they beach them­selves, yet pur­sue them to the ends of the Earth to kill them?

The ances­tors of mod­ern whales once walked the Earth. Six­ty mil­lion years ago, all mam­mals were ter­res­tri­al. But the sea beck­oned as a source of food or safe­ty. Cer­tain mam­mals acquired aquat­ic habits, and as mil­lions of gen­er­a­tions passed, evolved ever more use­ful adap­ta­tions to a watery realm. Bod­ies became elon­gat­ed and stream­lined. Fore­limbs became flip­pers. Hind limbs and pelvis shrank in size and final­ly became inter­nal. The tail acquired a fleshy hor­i­zon­tal fluke for propulsion.

The broad out­lines of this sto­ry have been assumed for years, but the fos­sil record for cetacean evo­lu­tion is spot­ty. What did the whales’ ter­res­tri­al ances­tor look like? Which among today’s ter­res­tri­al mam­mals are their near­est rel­a­tives? These are tech­ni­cal ques­tions that turn upon detailed com­par­isons of the skele­tons of liv­ing species and the avail­able cetacean fossils.

Recent­ly, new fos­sil dis­cov­er­ies from Pak­istan have filled in the pic­ture, pro­vid­ing miss­ing links between Earth-walk­ing whales and our present-day leviathans. Line up some of the rel­e­vant fos­sil species—Dia­codex­is, Pakice­tus, Ambu­lo­ce­tus, Dorudon—and you have a step-by-step tran­si­tion from hoofed ter­res­tri­al ani­mal (ances­tral to our cows, sheep, pigs, deer, and hip­pos) to a web-foot­ed amphib­ian, and final­ly to a ful­ly aquat­ic swimmer.

A cow and a whale would appear to be unlike­ly cousins, until you start com­par­ing details of their skele­tons and putting them into a fam­i­ly tree of fos­sils dug up around the world. Of course, any such sto­ry remains con­tro­ver­sial for the pale­on­tol­o­gists who debate sub­tle dif­fer­ences of skulls, ankle bones, and ver­te­bra, and scratch their heads over the details of fam­i­ly rela­tion­ships. Theirs is, after all, a his­tor­i­cal sci­ence, like try­ing to recon­struct the rich panoply of an ancient civ­i­liza­tion from few sketchy clues dug up in the sand.

Last fall I had the priv­i­lege of par­tic­i­pat­ing in the ded­i­ca­tion of the new, state-of-the-art Phelps Sci­ence Cen­ter at Phillips Exeter Acad­e­my in Exeter, N.H. The build­ing’s most dra­mat­ic adorn­ment is the skele­ton of a 27-foot hump­back whale that hangs in the mul­ti­sto­ry lob­by. The skele­ton has been pro­vid­ed with a fiber­glass fluke, and mount­ed as if the ani­mal were spi­ral­ing toward the sur­face of the sea.

This young male hump­back beached him­self in spring 2000 on Cape Cod, and died there. After an autop­sy con­duct­ed by the New Eng­land Aquar­i­um, the bones were giv­en to Phillips Exeter, cleaned, and expert­ly mount­ed. Even stripped of its flesh, the ani­mal has grace.

The skele­ton is more than a dec­o­ra­tion. The Phillips Exeter sci­ence fac­ul­ty uses it for instruc­tion, and no sto­ry they might tell is more impor­tant than the uni­ty of life by com­mon descent. With­in that more gen­er­al epic, no chap­ter more intrigu­ing­ly engages our imag­i­na­tions than the tale of how a fleet-foot­ed, wolf-sized, hoofed ances­tor of cows, pigs and hip­pos took to the sea, and in the course of 50 mil­lion years became trans­formed into an undis­put­ed lord of that watery realm.

Share this Musing: