The slaughter of the innocents

The slaughter of the innocents

Detail of red-tailed hawks from J. J. Audubon's “Birds of America” (Public Domain)

Originally published 20 December 1993

A still Novem­ber morn­ing. Brit­tle, trans­par­ent, like glass. Sud­den­ly shattered.

Not 50 feet in front of me a huge bird labors into the air, a gray bur­den in its talons. Push, push, push — gain­ing alti­tude. Com­ing to rest on the branch of a pine.

A red-tailed hawk.

I slip my binoc­u­lars from my bag and focus. The hawk sits upon a plump cush­ion of feath­ers. I move clos­er until I see that the cush­ion is a pigeon, not dead but ter­ri­fied into stillness.

I have wit­nessed some­thing pri­mal, unpret­ty, true. Nature red in tooth and claw. The bloody engine of evolution.

A few days lat­er I am in Wash­ing­ton, vis­it­ing the Nation­al Gallery of Art’s exhib­it of John James Audubon’s water­col­ors for The Birds of Amer­i­ca. Here among a peace­able king­dom of war­blers, vire­os, and wrens are male and female red-tailed hawks, caught by Audubon’s brush in mid-air, the male’s wings swept back, his talons tear­ing at the female, seek­ing to snatch from her the fright­ened hare in her claws.

The paint­ing was done in Louisiana in 1821, not long after Audubon wit­nessed the air­borne battle.

The pos­tures of the birds show their plumage to best ornitho­log­i­cal advan­tage. We are giv­en the male bird’s back, the female’s breast. The beaks are ren­dered in pro­file and from the top. The red tail feath­ers are shown from above and below.

It was Audubon’s genius that he was able to com­bine live­ly sto­ry-telling with accu­rate sci­en­tif­ic descrip­tion. It is the source of our endur­ing fas­ci­na­tion with his art.

Audubon refused to pret­ti­fy nature or soft­en its appar­ent cru­el­ty. The hare in the female hawk’s talons can almost be seen to shiv­er and whim­per with fright. Its bel­ly is streaked with blood and urine. This harsh real­ism is also part of our fas­ci­na­tion with Audubon.

When the artist arrived in Edin­burgh, Scot­land, look­ing for a print­er for his work, he showed his water­col­ors to the engraver William Home Lizars. Lizars was imme­di­ate­ly drawn to the paint­ings depict­ing vio­lence in nature: Mock­ing-birds attacked by a rat­tlesnake, a hawk pounc­ing on 17 par­tridges, and a whoop­ing crane eat­ing new­ly-born alli­ga­tors. He final­ly decid­ed to begin his work with great-foot­ed hawks, “with bloody rags at their beaks’ ends and cru­el delight in their dar­ing eyes.”

Audubon was a woods­man. He shot his birds to paint them. He expe­ri­enced dai­ly the hard con­tin­u­um of vio­lence that links us with the oth­er beasts. He also par­tic­i­pat­ed in sev­er­al inci­dents of vio­lence of a kind that sep­a­rates us from the rest of nature.

In Ken­tucky, in 1813, a bil­lion pas­sen­ger pigeons came to roost in a for­est on the banks of the Green Riv­er. Farm­ers trav­eled hun­dreds of miles to greet them. They came with wag­ons packed with guns and ammu­ni­tion. Audubon was there. His descrip­tion of the ensu­ing slaugh­ter is chilling.

Dur­ing the course of one long night, uncount­able num­bers of the birds were shot with guns or sim­ply beat­en from the trees with poles, each man tak­ing as many birds as he had pro­vi­sion to car­ry. Hogs were let loose to feed upon the con­sid­er­able remain­der. The car­nage vast­ly exceed­ed any need for food.

Lat­er, Audubon par­tic­i­pat­ed in a buf­fa­lo hunt on the Great Plains, a prodi­gious and ter­ri­ble tak­ing of life. After shoot­ing his first bull, he cut off the tail and stuck it in his hat. Oth­er hunters smashed open the skulls of ani­mals and ate the brains, warm and raw.

The great ornithol­o­gist expe­ri­enced a twinge of remorse. He wrote: “What a ter­ri­ble destruc­tion of life, as if it were noth­ing, or next to it, as the tongues only were brought in, and the flesh of these fine ani­mals was left to beasts and birds of prey, or to rot on the spots where they fell.” He feared lest the buf­fa­lo should go the way of the great auk, a North Amer­i­can bird that had pre­vi­ous­ly exist­ed in great num­bers, but already in Audubon’s time had been dri­ven to extinc­tion by human wantonness.

Among Audubon’s water­col­ors at Wash­ing­ton’s Nation­al Gallery there are many of sweet tran­quil­i­ty and gen­tle­ness: I was drawn espe­cial­ly to the sad, wise face of the great gray owl, and the great egret with a tail like a flow of water. But I came back again and again to the red-tailed hawks engaged in the bloody bat­tle for the hare, per­haps because they remind­ed me of the tak­ing of the pigeon I had wit­nessed only a few days earlier.

Vio­lence is part of nature, nei­ther moral nor immoral. It is only to acts of human vio­lence that we apply eth­i­cal judg­ments. Most of us do not fault Audubon the use of his gun on behalf of his art and sci­ence, but we shrink from the unre­strained slaugh­ters of pigeons and buf­faloes of which he was a part.

The pas­sen­ger pigeon is extinct. The buf­fa­lo sur­vives but bare­ly. Since Audubon’s time, many dozens of species of birds, amphib­ians, rep­tiles, mam­mals, and fish have been dri­ven to extinc­tion in the Unit­ed States. The slaugh­ter of inno­cents con­tin­ues. It is a kind of vio­lence that in all of nature is unique­ly human.

Share this Musing: