The path to heaven doesn’t lie down in flat miles…

The path to heaven doesn’t lie down in flat miles…

Photo by Steven Van Elk on Unsplash

Originally published 19 September 2004

Dur­ing my life­time, Amer­i­ca par­ty pol­i­tics have most­ly turned on mat­ters of class, mon­ey, and race. This year’s elec­tion [in 2004] is the first where the fault line between the par­ties is pri­mar­i­ly reli­gious. Take away Bush’s evan­gel­i­cal base and it would be no contest.

The coun­try is split down the mid­dle between Born Agains and Only Live Oncers — fun­da­men­tal­ist Chris­tians, on the one hand, and a loose alliance of athe­ists, agnos­tics, and what used to be called “main­stream” Chris­tians and Jews, on the other.

The divide is at heart epis­te­mo­log­i­cal: How do we know what we know?

Born Agains take their truths from scrip­tures and the pulpit.

Only Live Oncers look to sci­ence for truth about the world.

Born Agains read the Good Book.

Only Live Oncers read the Book of Nature.

Born Agains see the world in black and white, true and false, good and
evil.

Only Live Oncers mud­dle along in a world of gray and nuance.

Born Agains plan to live for­ev­er, rap­tured into bliss. Only Live Oncers are con­tent — or dis­con­tent, depend­ing on their tem­pera­ment — with what­ev­er is suf­fi­cient for the day thereof.

I find all of this inter­est­ing because I’m one of the folks who crossed the line.

I grew up in the Bible-thump­ing South where every oth­er tele­phone pole along the two-lane black­tops had a sign that said “Jesus is Com­ing Soon” or “Pre­pare To Meet Thy Maker.”

My fam­i­ly was Roman Catholic, a rel­a­tive rar­i­ty in Ten­nessee. But I was raised to be Pre­pared. Armaged­don might not be just around the cor­ner, but an eter­ni­ty of hap­pi­nesss or tor­ment was rid­ing on my state of grace. I lived in fear that I might acci­den­tal­ly die with a mor­tal sin on my soul, some teenage pec­ca­dil­lo per­haps. Sheep on the right, goats on the left. Fire and brim­stone for the goats.

But I had par­ents who read books and loved ideas. A few excep­tion­al high school teach­ers, Domini­can nuns, taught me to val­ue the life of the mind. By a stroke of luck I went off to the Uni­ver­si­ty of Notre Dame just as a new young pres­i­dent, Father Theodore Hes­burgh, decid­ed a Catholic uni­ver­si­ty could also be a great insti­tu­tion of learn­ing. By the time I left that place, after eight years of under­grad­u­ate and grad­u­ate edu­ca­tion, I had lost my faith.

For that, I give Notre Dame cred­it. My teach­ers taught me to think for myself, and gave me an excel­lent edu­ca­tion in sci­ence that made no ref­er­ence to reli­gion. Notre Dame sci­ence was exact­ly the same as UCLA sci­ence (where I also spent a few years). Or Uni­ver­si­ty of Tokyo sci­ence, for that mat­ter. I had dis­cov­ered a way of know­ing that tran­scends acci­dents of birth.

With a fresh Ph.D. in physics, I came with my grow­ing fam­i­ly to the New Eng­land of Emer­son and Thore­au. My trans­for­ma­tion was com­plete; I had become an Only Live Oncer, and I was deter­mined to live my one life as well as I could. I did­n’t want to be good because I feared hell­fire, but because it is good to be good — good for one­self, good for one’s fam­i­ly, good for one’s fel­low men and women.

I no longer believed in the God of my fore­bears. I had become, in short, an atheist.

But I still felt reli­gious. The more I learned about the nat­ur­al world the more I stood in awe of its mys­tery. I longed to sing praise and thanks­giv­ing. And to pray. “I don’t know exact­ly what a prayer is,” says Mary Oliv­er in a poem, “I do know how to pay atten­tion, how to fall down into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass, how to be idle and blessed.” I knelt in the grass.

The biol­o­gist Richard Dawkins, whom I much admire, thinks it’s a fraud for some­one of athe­is­tic tem­pera­ment to use the lan­guage of tra­di­tion­al reli­gion. The word “God,” for exam­ple. Or “prayer.” These words have mean­ings defined by usage, he says. “God” is a tran­scen­dent per­son­al being who hears and answers prayers and inter­venes mirac­u­lous­ly in the world. By that def­i­n­i­tion I am an atheist.

But why must words like “God” or “prayer” be stuck in their ancient usages? Why must I con­cede an age-old lan­guage of praise to the Born Agains? I read the Book of Nature; I have no qualms using the G‑word for the mys­tery that I find there, no embar­rass­ment using the word “prayer” for attend­ing with rev­er­ence to what I see.

I am an Only Live Oncer, but I try to live in a state of grace. Not super­nat­ur­al grace, to be sure, but the myr­i­ad nat­ur­al graces that bless and hal­low the everyday.

Share this Musing: