The passing of the venerable slide rule

The passing of the venerable slide rule

C. Raymo Sr.'s slide rule • Photo by Tom Raymo

Originally published 18 January 1993

My father’s slide rule.

I found it at the back of a bureau draw­er dur­ing a recent vis­it to my moth­er’s home in Tennessee.

An excel­lent Keuf­fel & Ess­er log-log-duplex-decitrig slide rule from the 1940s, with white plas­tic scales bond­ed to teak and a glass hair­line indi­ca­tor, neat­ly cozied in a stiff leather case. Twen­ty-one sep­a­rate scales.

My father was a man who took his slip­stick seriously.

He used it all day long, every day. In his work. In his play. While tin­ker­ing in his base­ment work­shop or prepar­ing a speech for the local chap­ter of the Amer­i­can Asso­ci­a­tion of Mechan­i­cal Engineers.

He lived in a world of three sig­nif­i­cant dig­its. That was the accu­ra­cy with which he read his mea­sur­ing instru­ments, and that was the accu­ra­cy of the cal­cu­la­tions he per­formed on his slide rule. It was enough for a tidy, self-con­tained life of ser­vice to his pro­fes­sion and his community.

Nev­er far away from the slide rule was a pile of Keuf­fel & Ess­er graph paper, heavy stock paper with green lines and light stock paper with orange lines, in an assort­ment of scales. Lin­ear, semi­log, log-log. A paper for every purpose.

He plot­ted every­thing. The many aspects of his work. The fam­i­ly finances. The stock mar­ket (although he owned no stock). The weath­er. Only when he saw data dis­played on a graph did he feel he under­stood it.

Even on his deathbed he was slip­ping his slip­stick and plot­ting the cycles of med­ica­tion and pain.

Slide rules and graph paper have gone the way of the dodo and pas­sen­ger pigeon, replaced by pock­et cal­cu­la­tors and com­put­er mon­i­tors. Thus, the strange emo­tions I felt when I found the slide rule at the back of the draw­er, like an arche­ol­o­gist unearthing a flint blade or clay lamp.

The first emo­tion, I sup­pose, was nos­tal­gia. For my father. For a world where thought and things went hand in hand. With a slide rule, the struc­ture of think­ing was vis­i­ble and tac­tile. You could see and feel the num­bers add, mul­ti­ply, divide. With a super-sharp pen­cil trac­ing a line on beau­ti­ful K&E graph paper you phys­i­cal­ly par­tic­i­pat­ed in the pat­terns that gave order to the world — and to a life.

Today, I punch num­bers into a cal­cu­la­tor or a com­put­er. The pro­cess­ing takes place invis­i­bly in a microchip for­ev­er sealed from human inspec­tion. Graphs are gen­er­at­ed by soft­ware. They appear on a video screen and pop out of a laser print­er. The won­der­ful, sen­su­al feel of think­ing with wood, steel, paper, graphite, and glass has been sac­ri­ficed to speed, con­ve­nience, and a degree of pre­ci­sion unimag­in­ably greater than the tol­er­ances of dai­ly life.

But more is going on here than an advance in tech­nol­o­gy. The change from slide rules to cal­cu­la­tors is dif­fer­ent, say, than the change from oil lamps to elec­tric bulbs, or from hors­es and bug­gies to auto­mo­biles. The pass­ing of the slide rule pre­fig­ures a change in the way we under­stand the world.

It is a change from nuts-and-bolts mate­ri­al­ism to math­e­mat­i­cal for­mal­ism, from a world imag­ined as hard­ware to a world imag­ined as soft­ware. The dance of dig­its inside a com­put­er’s sil­i­con chip seems des­tined to become the 21st cen­tu­ry’s metaphor for reality.

It is the rare sci­en­tist these days who does not use a com­put­er as an indis­pens­able acces­so­ry to thought. Biol­o­gists explore the dynam­ics of evo­lu­tion with arti­fi­cial life forms in com­put­ers. Chemists per­form exper­i­ments with dig­i­tal mol­e­cules. Cos­mol­o­gists watch galax­ies col­lide on com­put­er screens.

Even astronomers have turned away from their tele­scopes; instead, elec­tron­ic eyes peer though the scopes and dis­play dig­i­tal images on video screens. The images are teased and stroked by com­put­ers, and made to reveal their dig­i­tal secrets.

The microchip, in its indis­pens­abil­i­ty, its speed, its pre­ci­sion, its ver­sa­til­i­ty, is irre­sistibly impos­ing itself upon the way we think. The mate­r­i­al real­i­ty of Galileo and New­ton is yield­ing to bits and bytes. Instead of imag­in­ing the essence of things in the guise of wood, steel, paper, graphite, and glass, sci­en­tists are think­ing of dig­i­tal essences — a uni­verse of ones and zeros evolv­ing accord­ing to a cos­mic program.

None of this is to be lament­ed. It is a step for­ward in our con­tin­u­ing quest to under­stand the world. We are the com­put­er gen­er­a­tion; it is inevitable that we would devel­op a taste for a dig­i­tal universe.

My father’s death coin­cid­ed with the advent of cheap, pow­er­ful cal­cu­la­tors and per­son­al com­put­ers. After his death, his piles of K&E graph paper went out with the trash. His slide rule some­how made its way to the back of a bureau draw­er. Find­ing it there, I was indeed an arche­ol­o­gist unearthing a cul­tur­al arti­fact from a van­ished era.

Share this Musing: