The lady’s slipper

The lady’s slipper

Pink lady's slipper in New England woods • Tom Raymo

Originally published 8 June 1987

Lady’s slip­per. Moc­casin flower. Squir­rel shoes. The sci­en­tif­ic name of the plant is Cypri­pedi­um, which is Greek for “slip­per of Venus.” The ear­ly French explor­ers of North Amer­i­ca called it le sabot de la Vierge, “the sabot of the Vir­gin”; a sabot is a wood­en shoe worn by peas­ants in France.

Try as I might, I can­not see a shoe or a slip­per in this plant. Per­haps, with a stretch of the imag­i­na­tion, the inflat­ed hang­ing sac of the flower bears some resem­blance to the wood­en shoes of peas­ants I have seen in paint­ings by Van Gogh. But no mat­ter — the pink lady’s slip­per is the most spec­tac­u­lar wild­flower of New Eng­land and this is its season.

The lady’s slip­per is a plant that looks more appro­pri­ate to a trop­ic for­est or an orchid-fancier’s hot­house than to the New Eng­land woods. It is irre­sistibly gor­geous, and in a less envi­ron­ment-con­scious time it was in dan­ger of being picked out of exis­tence. I have among my books a wild­flower guide pub­lished in 1917. “It is becom­ing rar­er every year,” says this guide of the pink lady’s slip­per, “until the find­ing of one in the deep for­est, where it must now hide, has become the event of a day’s walk.”

The lady’s slip­per was once so rare in our area it was con­sid­ered an endan­gered species. In some states the flower is pro­tect­ed by law, but it is no longer rare. In one pine woods near my home the plants are so numer­ous that it is dif­fi­cult to take a step with­out crush­ing a flower under­foot. The lady’s slip­per appears to be mak­ing a come­back. Year by year I see more and more of these wild orchids in the woods.

Designed for success

As a fam­i­ly, the orchids are suc­cess­ful; they include more species than any oth­er fam­i­ly of plant. Most orchids are natives of the trop­ics, but the pink lady’s slip­per of New Eng­land may give us a clue to the fam­i­ly’s suc­cess: It is inge­nious­ly designed to com­pel pol­li­na­tion by insects — typ­i­cal­ly bees — and to guard against self-pollination.

Self-pol­li­na­tion in plants pro­duces a seed that is genet­i­cal­ly almost iden­ti­cal to the par­ent. When the pollen of one plant makes its way to a dif­fer­ent plant it is called cross-pol­li­na­tion. Cross-pol­li­na­tion mix­es genes, and makes it more like­ly that off­spring will dif­fer from par­ents. As Dar­win was the first to note, cross-pol­li­na­tion may give rise to hardier species of plants that are bet­ter able to adapt to their environment.

The blos­som of the lady’s slip­per fair­ly forces cross-pol­li­na­tion. There are two ways for an insect to enter the flower: through the long, inward-curv­ing slit at the front of the sac, or through two lit­tle holes at the top of the sac that are hid­den by petals. Attract­ed by col­or or scent, the insect invari­ably enters at the front, and soon dis­cov­ers it has passed through a one-way door into a volu­mi­nous cham­ber, lush with nec­tar but with no obvi­ous exit. If the insect per­sists in its explo­rations, it will find its way toward the two escape holes at the top of the sac. Forc­ing its way upward through a nar­row pas­sage toward free­dom, the insect must first encounter the female part of the plant, the stig­ma, which is equipped with tiny bris­tles, like a lint-brush. The brush removes from the body of the bee what­ev­er pollen it has car­ried from anoth­er lady’s slipper.

Free and undaunted

But escape is not yet com­plete. The bee strug­gles on toward one of the small round exits, where a male part of the plant, an anther, almost blocks its way. Forc­ing pas­sage, the bee becomes cov­ered with pollen. Free at last, it is ready to pol­li­nate what­ev­er plant it vis­its next, although one won­ders why, after so much trou­ble, it has not learned to leave well enough alone.

There is no way, in this sys­tem of one-way doors and tun­nels lined with for­ward-point­ing bris­tles that the insect can get to the male part of the flower before the female part. Self-pol­li­na­tion is vir­tu­al­ly ruled out by architecture.

I have read that a large bum­ble bee some­times finds escape through the flow­er’s nar­row pollen-retriev­ing/pollen-sup­ply­ing pas­sage impos­si­ble. The trapped bee has two alter­na­tives: to bite its way out through the side of the sac, or (as my ear­ly guide­book says) “to per­ish mis­er­ably in its gor­geous prison.” I have looked into the gor­geous sacs of dozens of lady’s slip­pers hop­ing to find some poor bum­ble bee so interred, so far with­out success.

Once estab­lished — and if unpicked — the lady’s slip­per seems to be rea­son­ably hardy. There is one par­tic­u­lar plant that I have returned to every year for the past five years: It is a soli­tary snow-white lady’s slip­per, alone in a woods with 10,000 of its pink cousins. Each spring when I know the plants are in bloom, I make my way to the place in the deep woods where this mar­velous plant flour­ish­es. And this year, it was there again. Still white; still alone.

I know that my white lady’s slip­per is not unique. The guide­books all note the exis­tence of a rare white vari­ant of the plant. In his jour­nal, Thore­au makes spe­cial men­tion of find­ing a white lady’s slip­per among the pinks. And I have heard from oth­er peo­ple who have white lady’s slip­pers in their woods. But in my neigh­bor­hood I have seen only this one white plant. It has not mul­ti­plied, but it has endured.

If lady’s slip­pers are pro­tect­ed by law, then the penal­ty for pick­ing my soli­tary white flower should be incar­cer­a­tion with­out parole. But I’m not tak­ing any chances. I have kept its loca­tion in the deep for­est — “where it must now hide” — entire­ly to myself. Only bees are welcome.

Share this Musing: