The guiding lights

The guiding lights

Photo by James Wheeler on Unsplash

Originally published 21 April 1997

A col­league, a teacher of Span­ish, asked about the ori­gin of the word “septen­tri­on,” which in both Eng­lish and Span­ish means “the north.”

The Latin root mean­ing, he says, is “the sev­en plow oxen.”

The ori­gin of the word was easy to guess. The “sev­en plow oxen” must cer­tain­ly refer to the sev­en stars of the Big Dip­per, the most promi­nent con­stel­la­tion of the north­ern sky.

No group of stars in the heav­ens is as well-known and eas­i­ly rec­og­nized as the Big Dip­per, famous every­where as a trav­el­er’s guide to the North Star, and there­fore to geo­graph­ic north. The two stars at the front of the Dip­per’s bowl are called “the Point­ers.” Fol­low them out of the bowl and you’ll come to Polaris.

Dip­per,” of course, is a mod­ern des­ig­na­tion. The offi­cial name of the con­stel­la­tion is Ursa Major, the Great Bear. In cer­tain Euro­pean and Near-East­ern tra­di­tions the sev­en stars of the Dip­per are known as a wag­on or a plow, and these are nat­u­ral­ly enough asso­ci­at­ed with oxen. The Romans imag­ined the oxen mov­ing around a thresh­ing floor, rather than plow­ing a field, in keep­ing with the way the con­stel­la­tion turns on the fixed pole.

By the time of Chaucer and Dante the term “septen­tri­on” was applied not only to the sev­en most promi­nent stars of north­ern skies, but also to the north itself. It is in this sense that Mil­ton in Par­adise Regained refers to “cold Septen­tri­on blasts.”

The word has gone out of style in Eng­lish, no doubt because we no longer pay much atten­tion to the stars as guides for travel.

But out-of-style does not nec­es­sar­i­ly mean out-of-mind. I have often been struck by how read­i­ly peo­ple fix their atten­tion on the pat­tern of the Big Dip­per when seri­ous­ly observ­ing the stars for the first time — as if some innate light of recog­ni­tion snaps on in their minds.

So strik­ing is this ready famil­iar­i­ty with the Dip­per that I have some­times won­dered if a map of the con­stel­la­tion might be part of our genet­ic inheritance.

This idea is not as bizarre as it sounds. It has been demon­strat­ed exper­i­men­tal­ly that cer­tain migrat­ing birds ori­ent them­selves by observ­ing the stars. In a clas­sic series of exper­i­ments, Stephen Emlen placed cap­tive indi­go buntings in cages under a plan­e­tar­i­um sky and test­ed their response to stel­lar cues. The birds were able to find north by observ­ing the rota­tion of the stars about the fixed pole.

Some researchers believe that migrat­ing birds might rec­og­nize the pat­tern of the Big Dipper.

Cer­tain­ly, birds, fish, and insects accom­plish spec­tac­u­lar feats of nav­i­ga­tion across con­ti­nents and oceans using clues from the phys­i­cal envi­ron­ment, includ­ing the posi­tions or motions of stars, and many of these skills are undoubt­ed­ly innate. Might not humans also have evolved the abil­i­ty to rec­og­nize a promi­nent pat­tern of stars that would help them find their way?

Sev­er­al things argue against this hypothesis.

First, the place of north among the stars is not fixed. The Earth­’s axis wob­bles under the stars, like a top that wob­bles as it spins. Every 26,000 years, the axis sweeps out a cir­cle in the sky. Today, the axis con­ve­nient­ly points close to the bright star Polaris, but this coin­ci­dence is tem­po­rary. Four­teen-thou­sand years ago, the axis point­ed towards Vega, and it was the North Star.

At that time, the Dip­per was far­ther from the pole than it is today.

Sec­ond, the rel­a­tive posi­tions of the stars on the sky are not per­ma­nent. Every star has some tiny motion rel­a­tive to the oth­ers. These motions do not sig­nif­i­cant­ly change the appear­ance of con­stel­la­tions over many gen­er­a­tions; how­ev­er, over longer peri­ods of time, the appear­ance of con­stel­la­tions is con­sid­er­ably altered.

One-hun­dred-thou­sand years ago, when Nean­derthal humans inhab­it­ed the Old World, the Big Dip­per looked more like a straight-han­dled spade than a dip­per. One-hun­dred thou­sand years in the future it will look like a duck.

The rate of genet­ic change would have to be extreme­ly rapid for nat­ur­al selec­tion to keep an inborn star map up-to-date on a time scale of tens or even hun­dreds of thou­sands of years. This may be why some birds fix on a cen­ter of stel­lar rota­tion rather than on a par­tic­u­lar pat­tern of stars.

More­over, the selec­tive pres­sure of evo­lu­tion would seem to have been less for human ances­tors, who pre­sum­ably did­n’t range far from home, than for migrat­ing birds, for which suc­cess­ful nav­i­ga­tion is a mat­ter of life and death.

All of which makes an inborn map of the Dip­per high­ly unlikely.

Still, I’ve seen that light of recog­ni­tion snap on when peo­ple see the Dip­per con­scious­ly for the first time. I’d love to get some city kids who have nev­er seen a dark sky or heard of the Big Dip­per (or Bear, or Plow, or Wag­on, or Septen­tri­on) into a plan­e­tar­i­um and observe their reac­tions to a care­ful­ly con­trived star show, to see if the fig­ure of the Dip­per evokes more reac­tion than arbi­trary pat­terns of equal­ly bright stars.

I have this fun­ny feel­ing that the asso­ci­a­tion of the Sev­en Plow Oxen with the north may go deep­er than lan­guage and culture.

Share this Musing: