The day the elephants had had enough

The day the elephants had had enough

Photo by Nam Anh on Unsplash

Originally published 19 March 1995

Ele­phants always remem­ber,” Peter Finch says to Eliz­a­beth Tay­lor in the 1954 film Ele­phant Walk.

Finch has brought his new wife to live on a tea plan­ta­tion in Cey­lon that he has inher­it­ed from his father. Per­verse­ly, the father had sit­ed the house astride a path ele­phants have used for cen­turies to reach their water­ing hole.

In the film’s thrilling cli­max, drought-crazed ele­phants reclaim their walk­way in a thun­der­ous, bel­low­ing stam­pede that reduces the house to rubble.

When I first watched the film in 1954, my sym­pa­thies were with Finch and Tay­lor. When I watched it again recent­ly, I was root­ing for the elephants.

In the inter­ven­ing years, ele­phant pop­u­la­tions plum­met­ed. In 1979 the pop­u­la­tion of African ele­phants was esti­mat­ed at 1.3 mil­lion (down by a fac­tor of ten from 19th cen­tu­ry lev­els). By 1989 the fig­ure was 600,000 or few­er. Kenya lost 85 per­cent of its ele­phants in that sin­gle decade. In many parts of Africa, the car­cass­es of dead ele­phants — tusks removed by poach­ers — out­num­ber liv­ing animals.

The cause of this slaugh­ter is ivory.

Since 1989, inter­na­tion­al trade in ivory has been banned by CITES (Con­ven­tion on Inter­na­tion­al Trade in Endan­gered Species). How­ev­er, not all coun­tries are par­ties to the con­ven­tion, and oth­ers refuse to com­ply with the ban. Some African coun­tries treat the tusks of ele­phants as a cash crop. The tusks can be har­vest­ed only by killing the elephants.

These great beau­ti­ful bag­gy-skinned beasts, the largest land mam­mals on Earth, are being dri­ven towards extinc­tion so that folks in Japan, Europe, and the Unit­ed States can amuse and adorn them­selves with ivory knickknacks.

The ele­phan­t’s plight is high­light­ed in recent books by ele­phant con­ser­va­tion­ists Ian and Oria Dou­glas-Hamil­ton, ele­phant researcher Cyn­thia Moss, wildlife biol­o­gist Dou­glas Chad­wick, and Nation­al Audubon Soci­ety writer Roger DiS­il­ve­stro. These books make chill­ing read­ing. As instru­ments of pub­lic edu­ca­tion, they may rep­re­sent the ele­phan­t’s best hope for sur­vival. The ele­phant can be saved only if con­sumer demand for ivory ceases.

But why should we be par­tic­u­lar­ly con­cerned about sav­ing ele­phants when every day many oth­er species are dri­ven to extinc­tion by human activ­i­ties? What makes the ele­phant more deserv­ing of our con­sid­er­a­tion than the north­ern spot­ted owl or the snail darter, two crea­tures that ran afoul of eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment in this coun­try? What makes ele­phants more deserv­ing of com­pas­sion than the count­less bird and insect species that expire with the rain forests?

That’s easy. We’re talk­ing about Babar and Dum­bo. We’re talk­ing Han­ni­bal cross­ing the Alps, P. T. Bar­num’s Jum­bo, and our first trip to the zoo. We’re talk­ing Ted­dy Roo­sevelt on safari, pos­ing proud­ly over his ele­phant kills, grand­ly con­firm­ing his (and our) macho prowess over the rest of nature. We’re talk­ing about an ani­mal that bulks as large in our imag­i­na­tions as it does in real life.

If com­pas­sion won’t save the ele­phant, then the north­ern spot­ted owl and snail darter — or black rhi­no, pere­grine fal­con, giant pan­da, Cal­i­for­nia con­dor — haven’t a prayer of sur­viv­ing as a species.

So let’s get those ele­phant books into libraries and schools. Let a new gen­er­a­tion of world cit­i­zen’s read Oria Dou­glas-Hamil­ton’s blood-soaked account of an offi­cial­ly sanc­tioned ele­phant “cull” in Zim­bab­we — whole fam­i­lies of ani­mals butchered for their tusks and meat, with noth­ing remain­ing of the adults but trunks and bones, and orphaned babies sold to cir­cus­es and zoos. She writes:

I looked at one of the dis­card­ed trunks and won­dered how many mil­lions of years it must have tak­en to cre­ate such a mir­a­cle of evo­lu­tion. Equipped with 50,000 mus­cles and con­trolled by a brain to match such com­plex­i­ty, it can wrench and push with tons of force. Yet, at the same time, it is capa­ble of per­form­ing the most del­i­cate oper­a­tions, such as pluck­ing a small seed-pod to pop in the mouth.

The trunk has social func­tions too; caress­es, sex­u­al advances, reas­sur­ances, greet­ings and mutu­al­ly inter­twin­ing hugs; and among males it can become a weapon for beat­ing and grap­pling like wrestlers when tusks clash and each bull seeks to dom­i­nate in play or in earnest. And yet there it lay, ampu­tat­ed like so many ele­phant trunks I had seen all over Africa.”

A con­ti­nent lit­tered with ele­phant trunks!

But per­haps there is some­thing bet­ter for the ele­phan­t’s cause than a few books by con­ser­va­tion­ists. Maybe there is mate­r­i­al here for a Hol­ly­wood epic film—Ele­phant Walk II:

A group of African ele­phants is sore­ly tried by poach­ers. At last, they go on ram­page, tram­pling the poach­ers’ camp. Then, trum­pet­ing revenge, they gath­er to their num­bers the half-mil­lion of so ele­phants still sur­viv­ing in the world and, in reply to cen­turies of human depre­da­tions, ram­page through the cities of Japan, Europe, and North Amer­i­ca, smash­ing pianos, tip­ping over bil­liard tables, tram­pling Ori­en­tal stat­uettes, combs, domi­noes, dice, chess pieces, tooth­picks, cuff links, col­lar but­tons, let­ter open­ers, bar­rettes, snuff box­es, and tis­sue dis­pensers, and along the way wreak hav­oc on homes, busi­ness­es, auto­mo­biles, shop­ping malls…

Share this Musing: