The Columbus myth

The Columbus myth

Columbus landing in the West Indies, as depicted by John Vanderlyn

Originally published 18 February 2003

My favorite pic­ture book when I was a kid told the sto­ry of Christo­pher Columbus.

The illus­tra­tion I liked best showed Colum­bus at the court of Fer­di­nand and Isabel­la, con­found­ing hide­bound church­men and doubt­ing schol­ars with sol­id, sci­en­tif­ic rea­son­ing. He is hold­ing a small globe in his hand. “I believe the world is round,” he says to the mon­archs. “Give me ships and I will prove it.”

This was the Colum­bus we knew as chil­dren: a light of rea­son shin­ing into medieval dark­ness, an heir to Archimedes, a pre­cur­sor of Galileo.

Of course, it was all a myth. Although Colum­bus adopt­ed sci­en­tif­ic think­ing when it suit­ed his pur­pose, he was more impor­tant­ly moti­vat­ed by an impas­sioned brand of mil­len­ni­al Chris­tian­i­ty. He believed the End Times were near, and that he was God’s mes­sen­ger, anoint­ed to bring all peo­ples to Christ in a restored Zion. The prophe­cies of Isa­iah and Ezra were as impor­tant to Colum­bus as the cal­cu­la­tions of ancient Greek map­mak­ers, and if he was ini­tial­ly reject­ed at the court of Spain, it may have been as much for his reli­gious fanati­cism as for his geo­graph­i­cal the­o­ries. After all, every edu­cat­ed per­son in the 15th cen­tu­ry knew the world was round.

The Euro­pean dis­cov­ery of Amer­i­ca — with sub­se­quent encoun­ters of peo­ples pre­vi­ous­ly unknown to each oth­er — was indeed a momen­tous event in human his­to­ry. And Colum­bus’s nav­i­ga­tion­al skills can­not be denied. But his voy­age was put in motion by pol­i­tics, not, as my sto­ry­book sug­gest­ed, by “man’s relent­less quest for knowl­edge.” The man who sailed from Palos, Spain, in 1492 was a pawn in the hands of impe­r­i­al power.

The Span­ish con­quests in Amer­i­ca were found­ed on an alliance of greed and evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tian­i­ty. On the one hand, the expan­sive ambi­tions of the Span­ish crown were stoked by an appar­ent­ly inex­haustible Amer­i­can resource: oro, or gold. On the oth­er hand, Europe’s “Most Chris­t­ian Majesties” per­ceived it to be their duty to con­vert hea­thens to the “one true faith” and “civ­i­lized” values.

When Colum­bus appeared on their doorstep, Fer­di­nand and Isabel­la had just suc­ceed­ed in dri­ving the Moors from Spain after cen­turies of occu­pa­tion. Through­out the Mediter­ranean basin, Chris­tian­i­ty and Islam were locked in a clash of civ­i­liza­tions, and the antag­o­nism between these two reli­gions col­ored Spain’s rela­tions with oth­er non-Chris­tians: black Africans and native Amer­i­cans. All were infi­dels. All required the sav­ing grace of Christ. All could be treat­ed as less than human if Spain’s quest for wealth required it.

The hor­ren­dous con­se­quences for the indige­nous peo­ples of Amer­i­ca need no retelling. What is less often com­ment­ed upon are the inju­ri­ous con­se­quences for Spain — the profli­ga­cy, the over­ween­ing arro­gance, the moral com­pro­mise, the shat­ter­ing repu­di­a­tion of Christ’s injunc­tion to “love thy neighbor.”

It was inevitable that soon­er or lat­er the peo­ples of Europe and the Amer­i­c­as would come to know each oth­er. There was indeed a sci­en­tif­ic curios­i­ty at work in 15th-cen­tu­ry Europe that was reach­ing out into the unknown. Even in Colum­bus’s time, the Sci­en­tif­ic Rev­o­lu­tion was aborn­ing, and with it new tech­nolo­gies with the poten­tial to enhance the lives of all peo­ple. Glob­al­iza­tion was afoot, and unstoppable.

So, what went wrong? A lack of restraint. A con­fu­sion of might with right. A sense of moral superiority.

It was­n’t sci­en­tif­ic curios­i­ty that took Colum­bus and his suc­ces­sors to Amer­i­ca. What took Spain to the New World was unbri­dled polit­i­cal pow­er claim­ing God’s favor and appro­ba­tion, sup­port­ed by evan­gel­i­cal Chris­tians, armed with over­whelm­ing tech­no­log­i­cal supe­ri­or­i­ty, and dri­ven by an insa­tiable need for oro.

Could the new clash of civ­i­liza­tions have been resolved with­out a clash of arms? Could the peo­ples of the two hemi­spheres have merged into one peo­ple, with­out the exter­mi­na­tion of one or the oth­er, learn­ing from each oth­er, shar­ing wis­dom and values?

Your answer depends, I sup­pose, upon your view of human nature.

My child­hood sto­ry­book pre­sent­ed Colum­bus as we wish he might have been — a man exem­pli­fy­ing humankind’s high­est aspi­ra­tions of intel­lec­tu­al curios­i­ty and moral courage. The mes­sage of the sto­ry­book strayed far from the truth, but the fact that we wrap our­selves so fer­vent­ly in the Columbian myth sug­gests that we under­stand intu­itive­ly what we have the pow­er to become.

Share this Musing: