Survival of the ugliest

Survival of the ugliest

John Tenniel's classic illustration of Alice and the Dodo, along with a modern reconstruction • Photo by BazzaDaRambler (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 18 October 1993

The dodo became extinct 175 years before Lewis Car­roll intro­duced his favorite bird to his favorite lit­tle girl in Alice in Wonderland.

Alice has fall­en, along with a mouse, sundry birds, and sev­er­al oth­er “curi­ous crea­tures” into a pool of her own tears. The Dodo pro­pos­es that all should dry them­selves by hold­ing a foot race, in which the con­tes­tants begin run­ning when­ev­er they wish and run until the Dodo decides the race should end. Every­one wins, every­one receives a prize, and every­one gets quite dry.

The Dodo is solemn and wise. In John Ten­niel’s famous illus­tra­tion, the bird is a rather dis­tin­guished-look­ing gen­tle­man, not at all the “dumb-dodo” of com­mon par­lance. After all, the Dodo of the sto­ry was meant to rep­re­sent Car­roll him­self, whose real name was Charles Dodg­son, and who some­times stam­mered his name “Do-Do-Dodg­son.”

Car­roll and Ten­niel have for­ev­er fixed the dodo in our imag­i­na­tions, mak­ing it the most famous species of extinct bird.

The dodo was native of the island of Mau­ri­tius in the Indi­an Ocean, where it seems to have evolved from a dove-like ances­tor, los­ing its capac­i­ty to fly, and where it lived hap­pi­ly until Euro­peans arrived in the 16th cen­tu­ry. As was often the case with oth­er species, con­tact with Euro­pean “civ­i­liza­tion” was not a ben­e­fi­cial expe­ri­ence. With­in a cen­tu­ry of its dis­cov­ery the hap­less dodo had been hunt­ed to extinction.

Por­tuguese mariners called the bird duo­do, mean­ing “idiot,” from which our name seems to have derived. The Dutch, who came along lat­er, called it dronte, mean­ing “bloat­ed,” or wal­ghvo­gel, “dis­gust­ing bird.” By all accounts, the dodo was indeed dumb, fat, and disgusting.

And not par­tic­u­lar­ly tasty. The longer a dodo was cooked the tougher and less palat­able became its flesh. But, alas for the dodo, it was digestible by hun­gry sailors, or bare­ly so. Ret­ro­spec­tive advice for birds: If you want to sur­vive, don’t be dumb, fat, and flight­less on an iso­lat­ed island halfway across a sea.

A stuffed head of a dodo has some­how sur­vived in the Ash­molean Muse­um at Oxford. It is clear from this spec­i­men that Ten­niel tidied up the dodo, mak­ing it more hand­some than in real life. A beak like a pick ax, a head like a hairy coconut: No more wal­ghvo­gel vis­age can be imag­ined than that afford­ed by the Ash­molean head. The only bio­log­i­cal prin­ci­ple that might have direct­ed this bird’s evo­lu­tion is sur­vival of the ugliest.

Beyond the Ash­molean head, not much sur­vives of the dodo but a few 17th cen­tu­ry sketch­es, anoth­er head, a foot or two, patch­es of skin, and a few hun­dred bones. Of these few clues, Bradley Livezy of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Kansas has recent­ly attempt­ed to pro­vide the defin­i­tive sci­en­tif­ic descrip­tion of the dodo (see Nature, Sept. 23, 1993).

Livezy agrees with the super­fi­cial­ly pre­pos­ter­ous idea that dodos are anatom­i­cal­ly relat­ed to pigeons and doves. And he con­firms what ear­ly explor­ers and traders report­ed, that the dodo was unable to fly. The bird was too dronte to get airborne.

What could pos­si­bly cause flight­less­ness to evolve? Well, on pris­tine Mau­ri­tius the dodo was most­ly free of preda­tors, at least until the arrival of half-starved Euro­pean sailors with blun­der­busses. The birds sur­vived on sea­son­al fruits and plants acces­si­ble from the ground. Obese birds stored more nour­ish­ment in times of plen­ti­ful food to help them sur­vive when times were lean. From an evo­lu­tion­ary point of view, it was more advan­ta­geous to be fat than to fly.

Livezy tells us that female dodos were two-thirds less fat than males and had short­er bills, but ear­ly eye­wit­ness accounts do not sug­gest that females were any less ugly. Why the dodo evolved to become so much less attrac­tive than its dovish cousins is dif­fi­cult to say, but dodo stan­dards of beau­ty were almost cer­tain­ly dif­fer­ent than our own. The most beau­ti­ful thing to a dodo was anoth­er dodo, and that’s what dri­ves the genes.

Livezy also won­ders if the dodo’s curi­ous physique was a result of so-called pae­do­mor­pho­sis, in which the devel­op­ment of a crea­ture stops when it becomes sex­u­al­ly mature, although some parts of the body have not yet achieved devel­op­men­tal matu­ri­ty. Thus we get, as one observ­er not­ed, a bird that resem­bles “a young duck or gosling enlarged to the dimen­sions of a swan.” With his sad fix­a­tion on lit­tle girls, Lewis Car­roll seems to have had his own prob­lems achiev­ing sex­u­al matu­ri­ty, which makes his choice of ornitho­log­i­cal per­sona even more appropriate.

The dodo isn’t the only bird dri­ven to extinc­tion by human preda­tors. There is also the Mau­ri­tius Red Hen, the Pas­sen­ger Pigeon, the Laugh­ing Owl (which did not laugh last), the Four-Col­ored Flow­er­peck­er, and the ʻōʻō of Hawaii — among many oth­ers. Remark­ably, even sev­er­al species of star­lings have been dri­ven to extinc­tion, although around my neigh­bor­hood it is the star­lings that dri­ve humans to distraction.

Of all extinct birds we remem­ber the dodo best, because noth­ing seems dead­er than, or as dumb as, and because — as strange as it seems — Charles Dodg­son had a stammer.


The Four-col­ored flow­er­peck­er, once thought to be extinct, was redis­cov­ered in the Philip­pines in 1992. It remains a crit­i­cal­ly endan­gered species. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: