Quantum jumps, flying bricks — and relativity

Quantum jumps, flying bricks — and relativity

George Herriman's "Krazy Kat"

Originally published 2 May 1994

A cat loves a mouse named Ignatz. The mouse’s sole goal in life is to bean the cat with a brick, a vil­lainy wel­comed by the cat as a sign of affec­tion, and per­haps it is. A badge-bear­ing canine, Off­is­sa Pupp, adores the cat and wants the mouse safe­ly behind bars. All of this in a sur­re­al desert place called Coconi­no County.

Ah, love. The eter­nal tri­an­gle. Or quad­ran­gle — if you include the brick. A web so tan­gled that even the pro­jec­tile-hurl­ing rodent unwit­ting­ly wor­ships at his tar­get’s shrine. “Loves me, loves me not… No, yetz, no, yetz?” the cat inter­ro­gates a daisy. Petals fall as bricks fly.

I’m talk­ing, of course, about Krazy Kat, George Her­ri­man’s art­ful com­ic that appeared in Amer­i­can news­pa­pers from 1913 to 1944. No oth­er strip has been so wide­ly admired.

It has been the sub­ject of a nov­el, a bal­let, and, most recent­ly, a drama­ti­za­tion at the Boston Cen­ter for the Arts.

The poet e. e. cum­mings saw Krazy Kat as a com­men­tary on Amer­i­can democ­ra­cy: a strug­gle between soci­ety (Off­is­sa Pupp) and the indi­vid­ual (Ignatz Mouse) over an ide­al of benev­o­lence (Krazy).

Cul­ture crit­ic M. Thomas Inge wrote: “To the world of com­ic art, George Her­ri­man was its Picas­so in visu­al style and inno­va­tion, its Joyce in stretch­ing the lim­i­ta­tions of lan­guage, and its Beck­ett in stag­ing the absur­di­ties of life.”

In the cur­rent issue of the jour­nal Post­mod­ern Cul­ture, lit-crit schol­ar Elis­a­beth Crock­er decon­structs the com­ic in an arti­cle called “ ‘To He, I Am For Evva True’: Krazy Kat’s Inde­ter­mi­nate Gender.”

Poor Krazy, forced to bear such pon­der­ous brick­bats of crit­i­cism. That sweet she/he whose inno­cent life reduces to “Ignatz!” Zip! Pow! “Ah-h‑h…”

The feline-obsessed crit­ics and schol­ars have missed the most most impor­tant point of all: Krazy Kat as pre­cur­sor of mod­ern physics.

I’ll not mince words. George Her­ri­man was the Heisen­berg of the fun­nies, the Ein­stein of Coconi­no Coun­ty. He was mas­ter of the quan­tum, the wiz­ard of rel­a­tiv­i­ty. His cat, cop, and brick-toss­ing mouse turned the deter­min­is­tic world of New­ton­ian physics upside down.

Krazy was the orig­i­nal Schrödinger’s cat.

It can­not be a coin­ci­dence that the first of Ignatz’s bricks were hurled in 1911. That was the year of the first Solvay Con­gress in Bel­gium that brought togeth­er the archi­tects of the new physics — Planck, DeBroglie, Ein­stein, and the rest. Already Planck had punc­tured clas­si­cal con­ti­nu­ity with his notion of quan­tum jumps, and Ein­stein had said that space and time were rel­a­tive to the observ­er. While the big guns of sci­ence were hash­ing this out in Brus­sels, Her­ri­man was con­struct­ing a com­ic world on the same principles.

Con­sid­er, the prob­lem of Krazy’s gen­der. Just as light can be some­times a par­ti­cle and some­times a wave in the new physics, so Krazy is some­times a he-cat and some­times a she-cat. It depends on who’s doing the observing.

The Heisen­berg Uncer­tain­ty Prin­ci­ple asserts the impos­si­bil­i­ty of pin­ning one thing down with­out anoth­er thing going out of focus. And that’s exact­ly what hap­pens when you read a Krazy Kat strip. Try to pin down Ignatz’s vil­lainy, and his affec­tion for Krazy goes out of focus. Con­verse­ly, fix his affec­tion, and his vil­lainy becomes uncertain.

The same for Off­is­sa Pupp. Is he a hero or a kill-joy? The two aspects of Pup­p’s char­ac­ter are as inex­tri­ca­bly and uncer­tain­ly linked as the posi­tion and momen­tum of an electron.

Fur­der­more…

The plants and rocks of Coconi­no Coun­ty trans­form them­selves from frame to frame in quan­tum jumps.

The sky of Coconi­no Coun­ty changes from day to night or night to day depend­ing on who’s doing the look­ing. Space and time stretch and com­press with Ein­stein­ian elasticity.

At the heart of the new physics is the idea that the act of observ­ing affects what we see; that is to say, there is no know­able real­i­ty inde­pen­dent of the know­er. Does the hurled brick exist unless observed by Off­is­sa Pupp? As Krazy Kat might say, the klub-tot­ing kop­p’s act of per­cepshun frizzes fluxa­cious real­i­ty into an i‑dee fix-ee.

And so furth.

By the time of the sixth Solvay Con­gress in 1930 — the last that Ein­stein attend­ed — rel­a­tiv­i­ty and quan­tum physics had tri­umphed. But Niels Bohr and Ein­stein con­tin­ued to debate what it all meant: Is real­i­ty depen­dent upon our par­tic­i­pa­tion? Do the laws of nature yield prob­a­bil­i­ties only? Etc. Etc. Mean­while, George Her­ri­man had long since answered all these ques­tions in the affirmative.

Coconi­no Coun­ty is the ulti­mate metaphor for the dis­con­tin­u­ous, every­thing’s-rel­a­tive land­scape of 20th cen­tu­ry physics — and 20th cen­tu­ry life. Krazy Kat is the per­fect cit­i­zen of such a world, and if we have any sense we’ll try to make our­selves more like her/him.

Take love where we can find it. Look for the best in the bricks to the bean. Be pre­pared for the improbable.

Zip! Pow! Ah-h‑h…

Share this Musing: