Putting a new twist on genetics theories

Putting a new twist on genetics theories

Photo by Joshua J. Cotten on Unsplash

Originally published 3 April 2001

Last week I vis­it­ed the Queen Conch, a large and com­mon shell­fish of the Caribbean. Let’s give that sub­ject anoth­er whirl.

Whorl, rather.

Like many snails of land and sea, the conch secretes an ever-enlarg­ing cone-shaped shell as it grows. The shell has a whorl, and the whorl is almost always right-hand­ed; that is, it curls clock­wise when viewed from the point of the spire. Rarely, a conch has a left-hand­ed whorl. Such odd­i­ties are called “sports,” and they are val­ued as col­lec­tor’s items.

Only a very few species of snail — the Per­verse Whelk, for instance — com­mon­ly curl in a left-hand­ed fash­ion. The hand­ed­ness of the whorl is genet­i­cal­ly deter­mined, but there would appear to be no oth­er rea­son why a snail’s shell should curl one way rather than the oth­er. Both sorts of snails exist in nature, mir­ror images of one another.

Hon­ey­suck­le takes on a left-hand­ed twist as it grows; oth­er vines spi­ral to the right. Most ver­te­brates, includ­ing humans, are bilat­er­al­ly sym­met­ric, exter­nal­ly at least. Of course, inside it’s a dif­fer­ent sto­ry. Our hearts are off-cen­ter and have a twist. So do our intestines.

The hand­ed­ness of a ver­te­brate’s inter­nal organs is con­stant for a giv­en species. Like the “sport” conch, a mir­ror image arrange­ment of inter­nal anato­my some­times hap­pens, even for humans. Nor­mal organ place­ment is called situs soli­tus; the mir­ror image is called situs inver­sus. Gen­er­al­ly, an indi­vid­ual with all organs reversed suf­fers no ill effects, but par­tial rever­sals can be damaging.

In recent years, sci­en­tists have been fig­ur­ing out the sub­tle genet­ic sig­nals that cause a devel­op­ing embryo to twist one way rather than the oth­er. A gene called PITX2 seems to play a cru­cial role in the inter­nal hand­ed­ness of vertebrates.

The twist­ed fab­ric of life goes much deep­er than spi­ral shells or lop­sided hearts. Even the very mol­e­cules of life have a hand­ed­ness, or chi­ral­i­ty. Pro­teins and DNA have a heli­cal twist, which is con­stant across all domains of life. More basic mol­e­cules, such as sug­ars and amino acids (of which pro­teins are made), come in both right- and left-hand­ed forms, but all life on Earth uses only right- hand­ed sug­ars (dex­trose) and left-hand­ed amino acids.

There would appear to be no rea­son in prin­ci­ple why crea­tures made of right-hand­ed amino acids or left-hand­ed sug­ars could­n’t exist. The exclu­sive use of one chi­ral form of mol­e­cules rather than the oth­er is evi­dence for the relat­ed­ness of all ter­res­tri­al life by com­mon descent, and the con­ser­va­tion of hand­ed­ness over time.

Why did life adopt one form of hand­ed­ness rather than the oth­er? Sci­en­tists have been pon­der­ing the ques­tion for decades, with­out success.

One the­o­ry sug­gests that the hand­ed­ness of organ­ic mol­e­cules had its ori­gin in radi­a­tion from a super­no­va that bathed the Earth as life had its begin­ning. All super­no­va radi­a­tion is polar­ized; that is, the light is emit­ted in a corkscrew fash­ion, either to the right or left. Research has shown that polar­ized radi­a­tion can cause chem­i­cal reac­tions to favor one chi­ral form of mol­e­cule rather than its mir­ror-image twin.

If this is true, then the hand­ed­ness of life had its ori­gin in an explod­ing star.

Oth­er sci­en­tists have pro­posed the weak nuclear force as the source of nature’s hand­ed­ness. This is the force that gov­erns the radioac­tive decay of a neu­tron in an atom­ic nucle­us into a pro­ton and an elec­tron. It is the only fun­da­men­tal force of nature (grav­i­ty, elec­tro­mag­net­ism, and the strong nuclear force are the oth­ers) with a built-in twist; the elec­tron always comes out with a left-hand­ed spin.

Exper­i­ments con­firm that left-spin­ning elec­trons can weak­ly bias chem­i­cal reac­tions toward one chi­ral form or anoth­er. If this is the source of the hand­ed­ness of bio­mol­e­cules, then the twist of our vis­cer­al organs may be con­nect­ed to an asym­me­try at the heart of matter.

But the hand­ed­ness of life may have a much sim­pler source. Stir­ring of chem­i­cal solu­tions can cause reac­tions to go one way rather than anoth­er. Per­haps life got start­ed in a “warm lit­tle pond” that was stirred by wind or cur­rents. Maybe in some com­pli­cat­ed way the twists of life are relat­ed to the spin of the plan­et itself.

A conch shell sits on my desk as I write. Its corkscrew spire pos­es a big, big ques­tion, and so far sci­en­tists can only guess at the answer. The fact that I’m typ­ing pri­mar­i­ly with my right hand pos­es the same ques­tion: Why are liv­ing things asymmetric?

What­ev­er the expla­na­tion turns out to be, the les­son is clear: It’s all part of a piece. Conch shells, hon­ey­suck­le vines, the curl of the human heart, explod­ing stars, whirling plan­ets, decay­ing neu­trons, bio­chem­istry: no part of this twist­ed, beau­ti­ful world can be abstract­ed from any other.

Share this Musing: