Optics, chemistry — and images

Optics, chemistry — and images

Early photograph of Paris by Louis Daguerre (1838)

Originally published 27 November 1989

One day in Paris, in 1827, a cer­tain Madame Daguerre approached the famous chemist Jean Dumas. Her hus­band was obsessed, she said, with an appar­ent­ly fool­ish idea. He believed he could make per­ma­nent pic­tures on met­al plates by means of light focused by a lens. Was his dream with­in the bounds of sci­ence, she asked, or was he com­plete­ly mad?

Dumas was skep­ti­cal, but not dis­mis­sive. “In our present state of knowl­edge, it can­not be done,” the chemist replied, “but I can­not say it will always remain impossible.

In fact, Mon­sieur Daguer­re’s dream was an idea whose time had come. For more than a cen­tu­ry chemists had known that cer­tain com­pounds of sil­ver react to light, turn­ing as black as ink when exposed to the sun. The use of lens­es to form images upon screens was also com­mon­place. If the screen were coat­ed with the appro­pri­ate chem­i­cals, it did not seem impos­si­ble that a pic­ture might be “etched” by light. What was required was a way to stop the sen­si­tiv­i­ty of the screen once the image had been exposed, and a way to keep the image from fad­ing away. Sev­er­al inves­ti­ga­tors in France and Britain were work­ing on the problem.

First cameras

On Jan­u­ary 7, 1839, Louis Daguerre demon­strat­ed his suc­cess­ful method for mak­ing light-pic­tures to the French Acad­e­my. Less than three weeks lat­er, Hen­ry Fox Tal­bot appeared before the Roy­al Insti­tu­tion of Great Britain with the results of his own inves­ti­ga­tions. Their work caused a pub­lic sen­sa­tion. As if by mag­ic, images of the world fixed them­selves upon met­al plates or sheets of paper with­out inter­ven­tion by an artist. Tal­bot called his inven­tion “the pen­cil of nature.”

A lit­tle optics. A lit­tle chem­istry. A lit­tle madness.

This year [in 1989] we cel­e­brate the 150th anniver­sary of the inven­tion of pho­tog­ra­phy. As part of that cel­e­bra­tion, the MIT Muse­um and the Polaroid Cor­po­rate Archives have arranged an exhib­it on the his­to­ry of pho­tog­ra­phy at the MIT Muse­um in Cam­bridge: “Image and Imag­i­na­tion: 150 Years of Pho­tog­ra­phy.” It’s a must for any­one who has ever been touched by the mad­ness and mag­ic of the camera.

On dis­play are hun­dreds of his­tor­i­cal and fine art pho­tographs from local col­lec­tions, includ­ing works by Ansel Adams, Mar­garet Bourke White, Walk­er Evans, Aaron Siskind, Minor White, Gar­ry Wino­grand, and dozens of oth­er artists who have used the mag­ic of pho­to­chem­istry to teach us how to see. The pho­tographs are rea­son enough to vis­it the muse­um, but even more inter­est­ing are the exhibits trac­ing the his­to­ry of pho­to­graph­ic technology.

Here are cam­eras from the age of Daguerre and Tal­bot — pol­ished wood­en box­es, the size of small chests, with lens tubes of gleam­ing brass — and the images made by these instru­ments. Daguerreo­types, won­der­ful­ly sharp, glis­ten­ing in their dis­play wal­lets of leather and vel­vet, the col­or of cop­per and iodine. And Tal­bot’s paper calo­types, the first pho­tographs print­ed from a neg­a­tive, soft­er, less crisply defined, like char­coal drawings.

A piv­otal exhib­it is George East­man’s Kodak No. 1, the cam­era that brought pho­tog­ra­phy to the mass­es (“You push the but­ton, we do the rest.”). A year after its intro­duc­tion in 1888, East­man had sold 13,000 cam­eras and his plant in Rochester was pro­cess­ing 7,000 neg­a­tives dai­ly. The No. 1 came loaded with enough film for 100 expo­sures; for 10 bucks you got a reload and your devel­oped prints. No more messy chem­i­cals, no more bulky equip­ment. The age of the snap­shot had arrived, and Kodak became a syn­onym for “cam­era.”

Oth­er his­to­ry-mak­ing cam­eras are on dis­play: Frank Brownel­l’s “Brown­ie,” the kid’s cam­era of choice from 1900 till 1954. The Graflex, fast and sharp, the news pho­tog­ra­pher’s favorite. Oskar Bar­nack­’s 35mm Leica that rev­o­lu­tion­ized pho­to­jour­nal­ism by putting pre­ci­sion optics and high-res­o­lu­tion film into a hand-held package.

Instant pictures

But no fea­ture of the exhib­it so cap­tures the imag­i­na­tion as Edwin Land’s Polaroid SX-70, the first instant col­or cam­era. Land had pre­vi­ous­ly made his­to­ry with his 1947 pic­ture-in-a-minute, black-and-white cam­era. Snap, pull, wait, peel, presto, a pic­ture! The black-and-white Polaroid was a mar­vel; the SX-70 was a miracle.

In the late 1960s, Land called his engi­neers togeth­er and gave them a pock­et-sized block of wood. Cre­ate a cam­era no big­ger than this, he said. Col­or film. Pic­ture eject­ed instant­ly and auto­mat­i­cal­ly from the cam­era. Self-devel­op­ing out­side of cam­era. No devel­op­ment tim­ing. No peel­ing apart neg­a­tive and pos­i­tive sheets. No waste to dis­pose of. No coat­ing of print. No print mount to attach. No expo­sure set­tings. No chance for dou­ble-expo­sure. In short, an impos­si­ble assignment.

But, of course, the impos­si­ble was pos­si­ble. All pro­to­types of the SX-70 are on dis­play, includ­ing that orig­i­nal block of wood. The final prod­uct, intro­duced in 1972, is more than tech­ni­cal wiz­ardry; it is also a work of art — an ele­gant fusion of chem­istry, mechan­i­cal design, optics, and elec­tron­ics, as pow­er­ful­ly demon­stra­tive of the pow­ers of imag­i­na­tion as any pho­to­graph in the exhibit.

In this day when Amer­i­ca’s busi­ness lead­ers seem con­tent to amass pho­ny for­tunes by shuf­fling assets, rather than by inno­va­tion and pro­duc­tiv­i­ty, it is good to be remind­ed of the achieve­ments of George East­man and Edwin Land. Like Louis Daguerre, they dreamed of the impos­si­ble and pos­sessed the imag­i­na­tion to achieve it. Their won­der­ful instru­ments, on dis­play at the MIT Muse­um until Decem­ber 31st, rep­re­sent Amer­i­can tech­nol­o­gy at its best.

Share this Musing: