On the contrary, Mr. Thoreau

On the contrary, Mr. Thoreau

Photo by Chuck Givens on Unsplash

Originally published 27 February 2001

In wild­ness is the preser­va­tion of the world,” wrote Hen­ry David Thore­au in one of his more self-indul­gent moments, and envi­ron­men­tal­ists nev­er tire of quot­ing him. Into the woods, they urge. Into the woods. That’s where we’ll find our salvation.

Not in sci­ence or tech­nol­o­gy. No, no. They are the ene­my. It’s wild­ness that will save us from our­selves, restore us to our primeval wis­dom, dis­ci­pline our hubris, chas­ten our sins.

Of course, Thore­au lived in a land­scape that was any­thing but wild. The Fitch­burg Rail­road ran along the banks of Walden Pond, for heav­en’s sake. “Hope and the future for me are not in lawns and cul­ti­vat­ed fields, not in towns and cities, but in the imper­vi­ous and quak­ing swamps,” he wrote, but he was glad to get back to good old civ­i­lized Con­cord after a sojourn in the Maine woods.

Nev­er mind. Betake us to the quak­ing swamps, say the Thore­au­vian envi­ron­men­tal­ists, back to the imper­vi­ous woods. Let us live like our hunter-gath­er­er ances­tors, in har­mo­ny with the land and oth­er crea­tures. Let us become dryads and naiads, gen­tle spir­its of tree and brook, tak­ing noth­ing, leav­ing only foot­prints — and not too many of those.

We have built a green­house, a human cre­ation, where once there bloomed a sweet and wild gar­den,” laments Bill McK­ibben in his influ­en­tial The End of Nature. McK­ibben is a man of unim­peach­able prin­ci­ple, and I would­n’t want to live in a world with­out him, but his sweet wild gar­den nev­er exist­ed, and if it did, the only way back is for 6 bil­lion or so human beings to com­mit mass suicide.

How refresh­ing, then, to have a book called Com­ing Out of the Woods, by an envi­ron­men­tal­ist who does­n’t look at the wild through rose-col­ored glass­es. Wal­lace Kauf­man sought his own lit­tle Walden, his own place in the woods. His expe­ri­ence there is a brac­ing anti­dote to those who believe that wilder­ness is an Eden that we messed up.

In the late 1960s, inspired by the first great flow­er­ing of green pol­i­tics, Kauf­man bought 360 acres of forest­ed land in North Car­oli­na with the idea of cre­at­ing a whole com­mu­ni­ty of lit­tle Waldens, includ­ing one for himself.

He built a road into the for­est, doing his best to save the fine old trees, then wrote covenants for prospec­tive pur­chasers that would keep the place wild — no chem­i­cal pes­ti­cides or seri­ous tree-cut­ting, that sort of thing. Soon he was the “may­or of Hip­pie Town,” accord­ing to the folks in near­by Pitts­boro and Chapel Hill.

On his own cor­ner of the 360 acres, he built a house and set­tled in. Like Thore­au, he went into the woods “to live delib­er­ate­ly,” com­muning with nature, wash­ing his spir­it in the wild — and he stayed 15 times longer than Thore­au resided at Walden. Indeed, he’s still there.

It would be a shame to spoil the read­ing of this wise and fun­ny book by retelling Kauf­man’s adven­tures. Suf­fice it to say that Thore­au and Kauf­man had a lov­ing but trou­bled rela­tion­ship in the North Car­oli­na woods. Green pol­i­tics met prac­ti­cal real­i­ties, and what came out of the clash was less quak­ing swamp than quak­ing principles.

Sweet and wild gar­den? Try cop­per­heads in the crawl space, squir­rels in the eaves, and deer in the bean patch. Kauf­man tried his best to accom­mo­date them all, but found that human inter­ests and nat­ur­al instincts don’t always mesh. And then came Hur­ri­cane Fran, roar­ing up his val­ley and knock­ing down all those grand old trees he had tried so hard to protect.

Nature had been no kinder to this for­est than God was to Job,” Kauf­man mus­es, unro­man­ti­cal­ly. “She would as soon make mag­got meat out of a squishy lit­tle human being as offer him or her a fine view.”

And now, with a new admin­is­tra­tion in Wash­ing­ton, we can expect increased pres­sure on the few remain­ing “wild” places where the touch of the human hand is light — the Alas­ka Nation­al Wildlife Refuge, for exam­ple, or the not-so-quak­ing swamps of the Ever­glades. How can we best resist these pres­sures? Not by roman­ti­ciz­ing wilder­ness, or by invok­ing the sen­ti­ments of hunter-gath­er­er soci­eties, but by draw­ing upon our own most civ­i­lized instincts.

This is the les­son of Kauf­man’s expe­ri­ence: “Nowhere is nature a Gar­den of Eden. When­ev­er con­scious­ness dawned in the human brain, our ances­tors found them­selves in a wilder­ness. They set about con­quer­ing its dan­gers. They began to reshape it with Eden as their mod­el. They knew, in those days before roman­tic illu­sions, that if nature was ever to be a friend to humankind, they would have to com­mand it to be so.”

We did not come from Eden, Kauf­man says, but we can go there. With wis­dom, humil­i­ty, opti­mism, and restraint, we can devise a world in which humans and the wild achieve some sort of accom­mo­da­tion — a beau­ti­ful domin­ion. Sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy can — and must — be part of the equa­tion. Thore­au had it back­wards: In civ­i­liza­tion is the preser­va­tion of the wild.

Share this Musing: