Of mayflies, turtles, and a ripe old age

Of mayflies, turtles, and a ripe old age

Jonathan, a giant tortoise hatched in c. 1832 • Photo by Kevstan (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Originally published 7 December 1992

Life is ephemeral.

Espe­cial­ly if you belong to that order of insects called Ephemeroptera, the mayflies. An adult mayfly lives for min­utes or hours. Most of their brief lives are spent in nup­tial flight. On warm sum­mer evenings, male mayflies launch them­selves into the air in flit­tery swarms, ris­ing and falling. Each female that joins the throng is prompt­ly seized by a male. The cou­ple leave the swarm and mate. She lays her eggs and dies, togeth­er with her paramour.

A sin­gle sum­mer evening is the mayfly­’s allot­ted lifes­pan. From the point of view of evo­lu­tion, it’s the per­fect life: flit, pro­cre­ate, die.

Tur­tles enjoy a more pro­tract­ed life, in keep­ing with their tor­pid ways. The longest authen­ti­cat­ed lifes­pan of any ani­mal is that of “Mar­i­on’s tor­toise,” tak­en as an adult from its native Sey­chelles Islands to the island of Mau­ru­tius, where no tor­tois­es live, by the French explor­er Mar­i­on de Fresne in 1766. This huge, lum­ber­ing beast sur­vived until 1918, for a record age of more than 152 years.

Only tur­tles live longer than humans. We can out­live two (suc­ces­sive) hip­popota­mus­es, three cats, four dogs, or sev­en aard­varks. Hip­pos and aard­varks sel­dom com­plete their allot­ted span. Most often, they are struck down in the prime of life by preda­tors or dis­ease. Death from old age is an almost unique­ly human priv­i­lege, shared with our pam­pered and pro­tect­ed pets.

Even for us, the expec­ta­tion of a ripe old age is rel­a­tive­ly new.

Nine­ty years ago only one Amer­i­can in two reached age 60. Today, nine out of ten sur­vive for at least six decades. The sur­vival curve, as they say, is becom­ing more “rec­tan­gu­lar.” The ulti­mate goal is for every­one to live with rea­son­able vig­or for the max­i­mum span of life then — ker­plunk, fall off the brink.

And we are doing it, too. More and more Amer­i­cans are enjoy­ing an active and inde­pen­dent old age, thanks to health­i­er lifestyles and the won­ders of mod­ern medicine.

The sur­vival curve of ani­mals in the wild is any­thing but rec­tan­gu­lar. It plunges from the very begin­ning. For exam­ple, lap­wings (Old World birds relat­ed to plovers) have a max­i­mum lifes­pan of about 10 years, but only one bird in ten makes it half that far. Nature is bloody red in tooth and claw — so red that for ani­mals in the wild old age is the excep­tion rather than the rule.

For most of human his­to­ry, our sur­vival curve was not much dif­fer­ent than that of lap­wings. A typ­i­cal lifes­pan was only 30 or 40 years, because of the preva­lence of dis­ease, vio­lence, and acci­dents. Aging just was­n’t a prob­lem, because almost no one died of old age.

Now all that has changed. Our species, and our pets and domes­ti­cat­ed ani­mals, have escaped the dynam­ic of evo­lu­tion. We have dulled nature’s teeth and claws, and more than the fittest sur­vive. We are no longer con­tent to flit, pro­cre­ate and die; we want to be fit and active to the very thresh­old of obliv­ion. That’s what the rec­tan­gu­lar curve is all about.

But why stop there? Why not push the mor­tal side of the box up the scale, to age 100, or 120, or — what the heck, what’s to pre­vent us from liv­ing forever?

Sci­en­tists do not yet know the cause or caus­es of senes­cence (the fee­ble­ness of old age that pre­cedes inevitable death), but the process appears to be con­trolled by genes — some­times called gerontogenes.

There are lots of cred­i­ble the­o­ries to explain why geron­to­genes evolved. The one I like best (for no par­tic­u­lar sci­en­tif­ic rea­son) pro­pos­es that these genes became embed­ded in our chro­mo­somes because nat­ur­al selec­tion could not pre­vent their spread. For ani­mals in the wild, few indi­vid­u­als live long enough for geron­to­genes to kick in. Accord­ing to this view, aging is a fluke, a genet­ic quirk that did­n’t make much evo­lu­tion­ary dif­fer­ence because almost no one died of old age.

Now, geron­to­genes are deter­min­ing how and when most of us die. As a species, we are bump­ing against the end of the rec­tan­gu­lar curve.

What comes next? Michael Rose, a biol­o­gist at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Irvine, has bred fruit flies that live almost twice as long as their ances­tors, and robust­ly, too. No one has yet fig­ured out how to dou­ble a human life (sci­en­tists can’t selec­tive­ly breed humans), but as we learn more about the caus­es of aging, you can bet it will hap­pen. Some­time in the next cen­tu­ry, genet­ic engi­neers will start tin­ker­ing with geron­to­genes. And bio­chemists will fig­ure out ways to thwart the genes’s effects.

When the human sur­vival curve is stretched out twice as long, we will dis­place Mar­i­on’s tor­toise as the cham­pi­ons of longevi­ty — and dis­tance our­selves even more from the Dar­win­ian per­fec­tion of mayflies.

Not flit, pro­cre­ate and die — but flit, pro­cre­ate, and flit, flit, flit.

Share this Musing: