Nature’s perfect imperfections

Nature’s perfect imperfections

Joseph Merrick in 1889

Originally published 3 July 1995

On my desk is a blue­ber­ry gall, giv­en to me by a stu­dent who want­ed to know what it was.

It is an abnor­mal growth of the blue­ber­ry stem caused by a tiny wasp, Hemadas nubilipen­nis. The adult wasp lays its eggs on new growth in ear­ly sum­mer. The lar­vae hatch, bur­row into the stem, and secrete a chem­i­cal that caus­es the blue­ber­ry to grow a lump­ish swelling, which usu­al­ly dis­torts the twig into a U shape.

In the cozy inte­ri­or of the gall, a dozen or so wasp grubs pass the win­ter. In spring, they nib­ble their way to just under the gal­l’s skin, meta­mor­phose into adult wasps, then push out into the world. If you find a gall lat­er in the sea­son, it will be rid­dled with escape tun­nels, each a mil­lime­ter or so in diameter.

The gall on my desk appears to be a mis­shapen lit­tle man, with escape holes for eyes, a crease for a mouth, and pro­trud­ing bits of blue­ber­ry stem for limbs.

The image is famil­iar. The man’s name is Joseph Mer­rick.

I fetch a biog­ra­phy of Mer­rick from the library, with pic­tures of the sub­ject drawn from life. I place the blue­ber­ry gall next to the pic­tures. The like­ness is uncanny.

Mer­rick is known to his­to­ry as the Ele­phant Man. He looked — well, like a blue­ber­ry gall. Huge lump­ish growths on his head, back, but­tocks, and legs. Slabs of rep­til­ian skin. Twist­ed bones. One arm slen­der and nor­mal, the oth­er a grotesque tuber. Healthy in mind, with nor­mal gen­i­tals and sex­u­al appetites, Mer­rick was nev­er­the­less so mon­strous in appear­ance that he ignit­ed fear and loathing in all who saw him.

He was born in Leices­ter, Eng­land, in 1861, and was aban­doned by his moth­er to a work­house at age 3 or 4. As a young man, he allowed him­self to be exhib­it­ed as a freak as his only way of mak­ing a liv­ing. In his twen­ties, he was “res­cued” from this odi­ous fate and giv­en a room in which to live at Lon­don Hos­pi­tal. Even his nurs­es could not bear to look upon him. If he appeared in the street with­out a mask and all-cov­er­ing cloak, a riot was sure to follow.

The Vic­to­ri­ans were fas­ci­nat­ed with Mer­rick. In his hos­pi­tal cham­ber, called the Ele­phant Room, he was vis­it­ed by mem­bers of the med­ical estab­lish­ment, celebri­ties and roy­al­ty. They gawked; they were repelled; they spoke plat­i­tudes. He invest­ed in them, one imag­ines, a feel­ing of smug supe­ri­or­i­ty, an oppor­tu­ni­ty to prac­tice their Chris­tian­i­ty, to love (or pre­tend to love) the utter­ly unlovable.

Fas­ci­na­tion with Mer­rick has con­tin­ued into our own cen­tu­ry. He has been the sub­ject of sev­er­al books — one by the doc­tor who res­cued him from pub­lic exhi­bi­tion, anoth­er by the anthro­pol­o­gist Ash­ley Mon­tagu. He has inspired an award-win­ning play by Bernard Pomer­ance and a film by David Lynch.

The Ele­phant Man endures as a cul­tur­al icon because his very exis­tence chal­lenges our faith in the good­ness of nature.

We assert that “beau­ty is skin-deep,” but we believe in our heart- of-hearts that phys­i­cal bro­ken­ness some­how denotes a moral flaw, if not of the bro­ken per­son, then of nature itself.

The word “mon­strous” means both “deformed” and “evil.”

What lapse in cre­ation allows cells to run so ram­pant as to turn the body of a man into some­thing so bizarre? What evil twist of genes gives rise to a man with the soul of Ariel and the body of Cal­iban? We can’t seem to accept this ter­ri­ble bro­ken­ness in a human life with­out evok­ing the action of a malig­nant Satan, or a God who sees and pun­ish­es our secret sins.

The gall manikin on my desk sug­gests anoth­er inter­pre­ta­tion. The dis­fig­ure­ment of the blue­ber­ry plant has no moral sub­text. A fly inserts an egg. A lar­va exca­vates and secretes. A genet­ic chem­istry is dis­turbed. The result­ing defor­mi­ty has been per­fect­ed by nature over mil­lions of years. The blue­ber­ry plant is not dis­ad­van­taged by the gall; the fly achieves an edge in the strug­gle to sur­vive and reproduce.

For all its strange appear­ance, the gall is no more good or evil than the pea­cock­’s feath­er, the orchid’s blos­som, or any oth­er prod­uct of evolution.

Only in humans do we count the dis­fig­ure­ments of genes or dis­eases as moral­ly debased. But the agents of dis­fig­ure­ment — virus­es, bac­te­ria, aber­rant genes — are fol­low­ing a script writ­ten into their chem­istry. Mer­rick­’s body was awry at birth. A genet­ic flaw made his thin frame the bear­er of ghast­ly gall-like growths. No God pun­ished him. No Satan worked evil. The script for that poor man’s mis­for­tune was in the DNA of his wretched­ly fis­sion­ing cells.

The chem­istry of life is not ani­mat­ed by love or jus­tice or pity. Humans can love nature, but they are not loved in return. Joseph Mer­rick died in his sleep at age 29, suf­fo­cat­ed by the bur­geon­ing excres­cence of his own head.

Share this Musing: