Nature’s music

Nature’s music

Period table of elements, Houston Museum • Photo by Shadow Byrd (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Originally published 25 July 1988

Some­where on the wall of every high school or col­lege chem­istry lab­o­ra­to­ry hangs a peri­od­ic table of the ele­ments. Every stu­dent of chem­istry has an image of the table graven on his brain. I need only close my eyes to sum­mon up the peri­od­ic table that hung in my own high school lab — a giant, col­or­ful thing with the sym­bols of the ele­ments print­ed in bold black let­ters on stur­dy fabric.

I was not an enthu­si­as­tic stu­dent of chem­istry, but when I looked at the peri­od­ic table I knew I was in the pres­ence of some won­der­ful, fun­da­men­tal mys­tery. The way the ele­ments fell into place, in ranks and rows accord­ing to their prop­er­ties — well, it was like music.

Why should the stuff of which the world is made be replete with pat­terns, har­monies, and cadences? On the left, in col­umn 1, the alka­li met­als — lithi­um, sodi­um, potas­si­um, and their heav­ier cousins (keep them away from water, our teacher stressed).

On the right, in col­umn 18, the noble gas­es — heli­um, neon, argon, kryp­ton, and xenon (safe and sane, com­plete­ly inert). And brack­et­ed between, like sub­stances neat­ly arranged on a phar­ma­cist’s shelves, the 92 nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring ele­ments, and a par­tial row of unsta­ble heav­ier ele­ments added by those mod­ern alchemists, the nuclear physicists.

What was the magic?

There were puz­zles aplen­ty in the table to intrigue the curi­ous stu­dent. Why did the gaseous ele­ments clus­ter at the upper right of the chart? What was liq­uid mer­cury doing down there in the mid­dle of the chart sur­round­ed by solids? Why did cop­per, sil­ver, and gold, among the few ele­ments known since ancient times, have a col­umn of their own?

In short, what was the mag­ic behind the music? What was the instru­ment whose tun­ing made the har­monies? The mys­ter­ies were soon unrav­eled by our teacher, who intro­duced us to the the­o­ry of atom­ic struc­ture and chem­i­cal valency.

It would be hard to describe the excite­ment that accom­pa­nied the real­iza­tion that the amaz­ing diver­si­ty of the world of mat­ter — the reac­tive­ness of the alka­lis with water, the inert­ness of the noble gas­es, the slip­per­i­ness of mer­cury, the soli­tari­ness of gold — all of this and more, could be explained by a the­o­ry of almost child­like simplicity.

I recap­tured a bit of that excite­ment a few weeks ago when I pur­chased a bril­liant­ly-col­ored, wall-sized peri­od­ic table of the ele­ments recent­ly pub­lished by Else­vi­er Sci­ence Pub­lish­ers of the Nether­lands. At the cen­ter of the chart is a table of the ele­ments sim­i­lar to the one that hung in my high school lab. In the broad mar­gins of the chart are 20 small ver­sions of the same table, and dozens of col­or-cod­ed graphs, each one empha­siz­ing some aspect of the music of the elements.

If the peri­od­ic table can be likened to music, then this new Else­vi­er Peri­od­ic Table is a sym­pho­ny. Or per­haps it would be more accu­rate to say that the peri­od­ic table of the ele­ments, here so bril­liant­ly rep­re­sent­ed by Else­vi­er, is the score of the sym­pho­ny which is the world of atoms.

No random things

The per­son who first tran­scribed the music of the ele­ments was the Russ­ian chemist Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev, in 1869. At that time, 63 ele­ments were known. Mendeleev was some­thing of a dream­er and a philoso­pher. He was con­vinced that the ele­ments and their prop­er­ties were not con­trived at ran­dom. Behind the appar­ent chaos of chem­istry he sought a pat­tern. “It is the glo­ry of God to con­ceal a thing,” he said, “and the hon­or of kings to search it out.”

Mendeleev wrote the names, atom­ic weights, and chem­i­cal prop­er­ties of the ele­ments upon 63 cards, and these he arranged into recur­ring sequences, by atom­ic weights, like the octaves of the musi­cal scale. He was not the first to look for a pat­tern with­in the prop­er­ties of the ele­ments — the idea was in the air — but he was the first to see the pat­tern in its entirety.

With­in Mendeleev’s arrange­ment of cards there were three blank spaces, where ele­ments were need­ed to com­plete the pat­tern and none were known. Bold­ly, Mendeleev pre­dict­ed the exis­tence of the miss­ing ele­ments, and even sug­gest­ed their prop­er­ties. For exam­ple, he pre­dict­ed an ele­ment with an atom­ic weight close to 70, sim­i­lar to alu­minum, eas­i­ly fusible, able to form alums, and with a volatile chlo­ride. With­in a decade just such an ele­ment — named gal­li­um — was dis­cov­ered. So were two oth­er pre­dict­ed ele­ments — ger­ma­ni­um, and scan­di­um — with pre­cise­ly the prop­er­ties assert­ed by Mendeleev. His beau­ti­ful arrange­ment of cards was vindicated.

As I write, my new ver­sion of Mendeleev’s table hangs on the wall across the room. It is too far away to read the wealth of graph­i­cal and numer­i­cal infor­ma­tion. But the rhyth­mic cadences of the graphs and the con­cert of col­ors stand out even at a dis­tance — mea­sures and har­monies pleas­ing to the eye and the mind. It is as Mendeleev guessed: Mat­ter is music!

In 1955, a group of physi­cists at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia in Berke­ley announced the dis­cov­ery of a new ele­ment with atom­ic num­ber 101. Sev­en­teen atoms of the ele­ment were arti­fi­cial­ly cre­at­ed by bom­bard­ment of lighter nuclei with the Berke­ley cyclotron.

The dis­cov­ery came at the height of the Sovi­et-Amer­i­can Cold War. Nev­er­the­less, the Berke­ley sci­en­tists decid­ed to name the new ele­ment for a Russ­ian. Ele­ment 101 in the peri­od­ic table of the ele­ments became Mendele­vi­um, and, like all oth­er ele­ments dis­cov­ered since Mendeleev’s day, fell pre­cise­ly into place in the score of nature, con­firm­ing once again the won­der­ful musi­cal­i­ty of matter.

Share this Musing: