Natty Bumppo’s early warning

Natty Bumppo’s early warning

Photo by Ning Shi on Unsplash

Originally published 14 March 1994

…the immense piles of snow that, by alter­nate thaws and frosts, and repeat­ed storms, had obtained a firm­ness which threat­ened a tire­some durability.”

Sound famil­iar? The words are from James Fen­i­more Coop­er’s The Pio­neers, set in the win­ter of 1792 – 93, but they might as well be describ­ing the win­ter of 1993 – 94.

Which explains, too, why I am read­ing Coop­er, the long-wind­ed nov­el­ist of the ear­ly-19th cen­tu­ry, whose long wind was much appre­ci­at­ed by snow­bound New Eng­lan­ders. His rip­ping and inter­minable yarns were — and are — the per­fect way to pass away win­ter-extend­ed hours of dark­ness and frost.

The Pio­neers intro­duced Amer­i­can read­ers to Nat­ty Bump­po, a.k.a. the Deer­slay­er, the Pathfind­er, the Leather­stock­ing, or Hawk­eye. In the book, Nat­ty is an old man of near­ly 70 years, set­tled on the shore of Lake Otsego in upstate New York, and he plays only a sup­port­ing role among the cast of char­ac­ters. The books that recount his ear­li­er adven­tures, the so-called Leather­stock­ing Tales, came lat­er from Coop­er’s pen; they were pre­quels inspired by the pop­u­lar­i­ty of Nat­ty’s character.

In his old age, Nat­ty has become, willy-nil­ly, some­thing of a philoso­pher. And most­ly what he phi­los­o­phizes about is the destruc­tion of his beloved wilder­ness by “the wasty ways” of settlers.

Ah! the game is becom­ing hard to find, indeed, Judge, with your clear­ings and bet­ter­ments,” he tells the prin­ci­pal landown­er of the region, upon whose land he squats. With his Penn­syl­va­nia long rifle and dead eye, Nat­ty takes his share of game, but it is the farm­ers, not the hunters, he insists, who make game scarce.

The farm­ers use long seines to drag fish by the thou­sands from the waters of the lake, rather than hook or spear. They blaze away with aban­don at the great flocks of pas­sen­ger pigeons that pass over­head, employ­ing even can­non charged with grapeshot, killing 20 birds to eat one. “This comes of set­tling a coun­try,” laments Natty.

The felling of trees frets him most. He imag­ines the day when the great silent forests will have been reduced to an end­less desert of stumps, with no place for game to live. His land­lord, Judge Tem­ple, shares his con­cern, and pre­dicts that if laws against the tak­ing of wood are not enact­ed, then “20 years hence, we shall want for fuel.”

All of this when the pop­u­la­tion of Boston was less than 20,000.

Nat­ty Bump­po and Judge Tem­ple were not alone in lament­ing the wan­ton destruc­tion of the wilder­ness. Many ear­ly-19th cen­tu­ry nat­u­ral­ists warned of the fate­ful con­se­quences that would fol­low denuda­tion of the forests.

It is dif­fi­cult for present-day New Eng­lan­ders, who find all the neces­si­ties of life at Kmart, to imag­ine the pres­sures on the forests of 200 years ago. In Nat­ty Bump­po’s day, the over­whelm­ing major­i­ty of cit­i­zens were farm­ers, and the clear­ing of land for agri­cul­ture pro­ceed­ed apace. There were also the tim­ber indus­try, the char­coal indus­try, the bar­rel stave indus­try, and the tak­ing of oak bark for tan­ning. Drafty fire­places hun­gri­ly con­sumed what was left of the forest.

As it turned out, how­ev­er, the forests of the North­east not only sur­vived but most­ly recov­ered from ear­ly depre­da­tions. With the open­ing of the Erie Canal, farm­ers moved west to more fer­tile lands in Ohio and beyond. The rail­roads brought build­ing tim­ber from the far north­ern forests of New Hamp­shire and Maine. Coal, and even­tu­al­ly oil and gas, replaced fire­wood as domes­tic fuel. Today, there are more wood­lands in south­ern New Eng­land than in Coop­er’s time.

By the mid-19th cen­tu­ry, per­haps 80 per­cent of south­ern New Eng­land was in field and pas­ture. The stone walls that thread our present woods are evi­dence of those pre­vi­ous clear­ings, but satel­lite pho­tographs show the region now amply wooded.

There are those who will take this as a les­son that tech­nol­o­gy will solve what­ev­er envi­ron­men­tal prob­lems tech­nol­o­gy cre­ates, and that con­ser­va­tion­ists are there­fore both­er­some doom­say­ers, des­tined to be as wrong as was Nat­ty Bump­po. They fail to remem­ber that the tech­no­log­i­cal devel­op­ments that allowed north­east­ern wood­lands to recov­er sim­ply moved envi­ron­men­tal prob­lems into some­one else’s backyard.

The north­east­ern wood­lands sur­vived, but only at the expense of the soot-cov­ered indus­tri­al cities of the Mid­west, the strip-mined hills of Appalachia, and ulti­mate­ly the more vul­ner­a­ble envi­ron­ments of Third World countries.

The old woods­man of Lake Otsego would not have cared a fig about what hap­pened to dis­tant rain forests or trop­ic reefs, as long as the dark cathe­drals of his own forests remained intact. What is required today, how­ev­er, is a glob­al con­ser­va­tion that Nat­ty Bump­po could not have imag­ined — not NIMBY (not in my back­yard), but TPIMBY (the plan­et is my backyard).

The snow­bound win­ter of 1792 – 93 at last gave way to spring, as win­ters do, and “the green wheat fields were seen in every direc­tion, spot­ted with the dark and charred stumps that had, the pre­ced­ing sea­son, sup­port­ed some of the proud­est trees of the for­est.” Nat­ty Bump­po cast a melan­choly eye upon this local evi­dence of wasty ways. We must take a longer, glob­al view.

Share this Musing: