Matter’s nature

Matter’s nature

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Public Domain)

Originally published 2 January 1984

Since ear­ly in the his­to­ry of west­ern phi­los­o­phy, mat­ter has been cast as the dross of cre­ation, the chaff, the bot­tom link of the chain of being, the low­est rung on a lad­der of val­ue that reached from the pon­der­ous cen­ter of the earth to the high­est heaven.

It was a bum rap.

Twen­ti­eth Cen­tu­ry physics has gone a long way toward res­cu­ing mat­ter from the philo­soph­i­cal dol­drums. Recent inves­ti­ga­tions in high-ener­gy par­ti­cle physics sug­gest that the chain of being is more like a snake than a lad­der, a snake that bites its own tail. Prob­ing inside the atom, the physi­cist has encoun­tered the uni­verse of the galaxies.

At the begin­ning of the cen­tu­ry the atom was imag­ined as lit­tle more than a tiny bil­liard ball, a stone or peb­ble writ small. In the physics of Neils Bohr the minia­ture bil­liard ball became some­thing akin to a musi­cal instru­ment, a fine­ly-tuned Stradi­var­ius ten bil­lion times small­er than the real thing. With the advent of quan­tum mechan­ics, the musi­cal instru­ment gave way to pure music.

In recent decades, physi­cists have uncov­ered ele­gant sub-atom­ic struc­tures in that music. The sim­plest of the con­stituents of ordi­nary mat­ter, the pro­ton for instance, has tak­en on the char­ac­ter of a Bach fugue, a four-part coun­ter­point of mat­ter and ener­gy, space and time.

Remark­able progress has been made toward uni­fy­ing our under­stand­ing of the forces that hold atoms and the uni­verse togeth­er. New, high­ly spec­u­la­tive “super sym­me­try” the­o­ries promise to unite the elec­tro­mag­net­ic-weak force and the strong force, and to bring grav­i­ty into the fold as well. This “grand uni­fi­ca­tion” would real­ize Ein­stein’s dream of a sin­gle all-embrac­ing the­o­ry of nature.

Already, astronomers and par­ti­cle physi­cists are engaged in a vig­or­ous dia­logue. Astronomers are pre­pared to rec­og­nize that the large-scale struc­ture of the uni­verse may be deter­mined by the sub­tlest res­o­nances of sub­atom­ic mat­ter. And par­ti­cle physi­cists are hop­ing to find con­fir­ma­tion of their the­o­ries in the astronomer’s obser­va­tions of deep space and time.

The pri­ma­ry instru­ment for the inves­ti­ga­tion of mat­ter has been the par­ti­cle accel­er­a­tor, in which beams of accel­er­at­ed par­ti­cles are slammed into oth­er par­ti­cles at rest or made to col­lide with beams mov­ing in the oppo­site direc­tion. In the debris of these col­li­sions, physi­cists search for the ulti­mate con­stituents of mat­ter. By a strange irony, more and more pow­er­ful machines are required to probe mat­ter at ever more del­i­cate lev­els of structure.

Super accelerator

Cur­rent­ly, the most ener­getic of these machines is the super­con­duct­ing pro­ton syn­chro­tron now gear­ing up at the Fer­mi Nation­al Accel­er­a­tor Cen­ter near Chica­go. In recent tests, that machine reached ener­gies of half-a-bil­lion elec­tron volts. (An elec­tron volt is the ener­gy that could be impart­ed to an elec­tron or a pro­ton by a sin­gle flash­light bat­tery.) The Illi­nois machine is designed to accel­er­ate pro­tons to one tril­lion elec­tron-volts in a ring of super­con­duct­ing mag­nets three and a half miles in diameter.

How­ev­er, recent prizes in high-ener­gy physics have passed to the Euro­pean Lab­o­ra­to­ry for Par­ti­cle Physics (CERN), near Gene­va. The CERN machine was the first oper­a­tional accel­er­a­tor to reach ener­gies of sev­er­al hun­dred bil­lion elec­tron volts. In 1983 the Gene­va lab announced the dis­cov­ery of the elu­sive W and Z0 par­ti­cles. The dis­cov­ery pro­vid­ed stun­ning ver­i­fi­ca­tion of the elec­tro­mag­net­ic-weak inter­ac­tion the­o­ry (which pre­dict­ed their exis­tence), and gave a con­sid­er­able boost to the morale and pres­tige of Euro­pean par­ti­cle physics.

The dis­cov­ery of the W and Z0 par­ti­cles at Gene­va has spurred US physi­cists in their efforts to build the biggest machine yet. The Depart­ment of Ener­gy’s High Ener­gy Physics Advi­so­ry Pan­el has rec­om­mend­ed that US physi­cists pro­ceed imme­di­ate­ly with a 12-year effort to build a mul­ti-bil­lion dol­lar “super­con­duct­ing super­col­lid­er” that would be by far the biggest and most expen­sive sci­en­tif­ic instru­ment in history.

The pro­posed machine will be enclosed in a buried ring with a diam­e­ter of 60 miles. It has been dubbed “Desertron,” because it could only be built in the flat deserts of the Amer­i­can south­west. It will accel­er­ate twin beams of pro­tons to twen­ty tril­lion elec­tron volts and smash them head on. In the rub­ble of these titan­ic atom­ic col­li­sions the physi­cists hope to find clues that will lead them to the “grand uni­fi­ca­tion” of forces, and to an under­stand­ing of the ori­gin and struc­ture of the universe.

Physi­cists have dis­cov­ered that mat­ter is a thing of aston­ish­ing tex­ture and beau­ty — build­ing block and archi­tect, music and com­pos­er. They hope that by prob­ing mat­ter on the small­est pos­si­ble scale they will be drawn into clos­er con­tem­pla­tion of ulti­mate mys­ter­ies that have long intrigued mys­tics, philoso­phers and sci­en­tists alike. What is the uni­verse? Where did it come from? Where will it go? And what is this thing called life that dances on the sur­face of mat­ter like flame on a burn­ing bush?


The con­struc­tion of the Super­con­duct­ing Super Col­lid­er, or “Desertron,” was can­celled by the U.S. Con­gress in 1993. Since that time, the Large Hadron Col­lid­er, oper­at­ed by CERN in Europe, has enabled fur­ther new dis­cov­er­ies in par­ti­cle physics. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: