Making ends meet

Making ends meet

The ancient Tunnel of Eupalinos • Photo by Tomisti (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Originally published 19 February 1990

In chalky rock beneath the Eng­lish Chan­nel, British and French tun­nel­ing machines are bur­row­ing toward each oth­er, like moles, from oppo­site shores.

When they meet lat­er this year, some­where under the mid­dle of the Chan­nel, an age old dream will be real­ized — Britain will be phys­i­cal­ly bound to Europe.

The Chan­nel Tun­nel, or “Chun­nel,” con­sists of twin par­al­lel rail­way tun­nels 30 miles long, with a small­er ser­vice tun­nel between them. Twen­ty-two miles of the Chun­nel lie under the floor of the sea.

We have heard lots about the design of the Chun­nel, and the pol­i­tics, and the finance, and even about the men who work in the hole. The untold sto­ry is the work of the sur­vey­ors whose respon­si­bil­i­ty it is to ensure that the British mole and the French mole meet nose to nose.

Not a simple task

This task is not as sim­ple as one might think. For one thing, the tun­nel is not a straight line from Dover to Calais. It wig­gles both hor­i­zon­tal­ly and ver­ti­cal­ly to stay in the prop­er sort of rock and avoid known faults and fissures.

The favored rock is called the chalk marl stra­tum. It is soft and rel­a­tive­ly imper­me­able to water, two con­di­tions that allow exca­va­tion to be car­ried out at high speed.

The first task of the sur­vey­ors was to estab­lish a sur­face net­work of fixed mark­ers on the British and French shores, and sight-line links across the Chan­nel con­nect­ing the two grids. The biggest prob­lem lies in estab­lish­ing the ver­ti­cal (ele­va­tion) rela­tion­ship between the British and French sur­vey grids. Fig­ur­ing out how high each site is in rela­tion to the oth­er is dif­fi­cult, because the atmos­phere refracts, or bends, light over the line-of-sight dis­tance between the two sides of the chan­nel. And because of winds, tides, grav­i­ty, sur­vey­ors can’t even be sure that sea lev­el is exact­ly the same on the two shores.

Next comes the task of extend­ing the sur­face grid into the tun­nel, and of keep­ing track of where the head of the tun­nel lies as it wrig­gles under the sea. This involves a tour de force of angle and dis­tance mea­sure­ments with lasers and com­put­ers. Cal­cu­la­tions and instru­ments are checked, dou­ble-checked, and triple-checked.

The poten­tial for embar­rass­ment is stag­ger­ing. If the British and French tun­nels meet out of kil­ter there will be a lot of red-faced engineers.

Just in case, the ser­vice tun­nel will go for break­through well in advance of the main tun­nels, so that adjust­ments can be made if errors have occurred.

Ancient wonder of engineering

The advan­tage of dig­ging from both ends at once is speed, a tac­tic first adopt­ed (so far as we know) by the Greek engi­neer Eupali­nos. Some 2,500 years ago, the Greek tyrant Poly­crates engaged the ser­vices of Eupali­nos to con­struct a 3400-foot tun­nel through Mt. Cas­tro on the island of Samos. The tun­nel would sup­ply the for­ti­fied city of Samos with a reli­able water sup­ply hid­den from poten­tial invaders.

Eupali­nos chose to dig from both sides of the moun­tain at once. His tun­nel remains intact, one of the lit­tle-known won­ders of the ancient world.

The Greek tun­nel was cut in pure lime­stone, with ham­mer and chis­els, by the light of oil lamps. It is six-foot square, just large enough to allow work­ers car­ry­ing rub­ble out of the tun­nel to pass those return­ing with emp­ty baskets.

About halfway through the moun­tain there is a sharp jag in the tun­nel’s course that indi­cates where two teams of dig­gers met, not quite dead on, but close enough to have heard each oth­er chip­ping at the rock.

How did Eupali­nos do it? His tun­nel is only two-thirds of a mile long, com­pared with the 22-mile Chun­nel, and dead straight rather than wrig­gly, but with the tech­nol­o­gy avail­able in his time his chal­lenge was no less demanding.

It is impos­si­ble to know his sur­vey meth­ods, but after care­ful exam­i­na­tion of the site, sci­ence his­to­ri­an June Good­field sug­gest­ed a pos­si­ble sce­nario in the June 1964 issue of Sci­en­tif­ic Amer­i­can.

First, Eupali­nos ran a series of ver­ti­cal poles up and over the moun­tain, from one por­tal to the oth­er, assur­ing align­ment by sight­ing along each pair of poles to the next. This estab­lished the line of the tun­nel. The line was extend­ed beyond the por­tals of the tun­nel, and then back into the tun­nel itself.

Ver­ti­cal align­ment was more dif­fi­cult, espe­cial­ly as the tun­nel required a slope so that water would flow through it. There is no place where one can stand and see both por­tals, and the sea, which could have afford­ed a nat­ur­al ref­er­ence hori­zon, is not vis­i­ble from the north­ern por­tal. Per­haps Eupali­nos sight­ed from pole to pole over the moun­tain with some form of water lev­el, mea­sur­ing dif­fer­ences in ele­va­tions along the poles.

When the last inter­ven­ing bit of rock was hewn away and light shone through from end to end, Eupali­nos was undoubt­ed­ly fet­ed by by the cit­i­zens of Samos, and (we hope) amply reward­ed by his employ­er. British and French Chun­nel engi­neers can only hope to be as skill­ful — or as lucky.


With much fan­fare, the British and French ser­vice tun­nels were con­nect­ed under­neath the Chan­nel on Decem­ber 1, 1990. The main chan­nel tun­nels were opened to trav­el in 1994. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: