Looking for ET online

Looking for ET online

Photo by Donald Giannatti on Unsplash

Originally published 21 June 1999

It is a mar­riage made in heaven.

The search for extrater­res­tri­al intel­li­gence (SETI) and per­son­al computers.

A huge mass of data look­ing for cheap processing.

Start with 35 giga­bytes of radio sig­nals col­lect­ed every day by the big Areci­bo tele­scope in Puer­to Rico, across broad bands of fre­quen­cies and a good chunk of the sky. Maybe some­where in that hiss of celes­tial noise is a sig­nal of intel­li­gent ori­gin, some­thing that can­not be explained by any known non-intel­li­gent nat­ur­al process.

To find the mes­sage in the noise — if there is one — will require a lot of work by a pow­er­ful super­com­put­er, or by thou­sands of not-so-pow­er­ful com­put­ers work­ing together.

This last strat­e­gy is the goal of a new project called SETI@home, spon­sored by the non-prof­it Plan­e­tary Soci­ety, and based at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia at Berkeley.

Here’s how it works. Par­tic­i­pat­ing vol­un­teers down­load into their per­son­al com­put­ers a data analy­sis pro­gram sup­plied over the Inter­net by the sci­en­tists at Berke­ley. Then each day the raw data col­lect­ed at Areci­bo is chopped into small­er chunks and parceled out over the Inter­net to per­son­al com­put­ers all over the globe.

As a machine sits idle, as most per­son­al com­put­ers do most of the time, it will crunch num­bers for SETI.

The results of the analy­sis are auto­mat­i­cal­ly sent to Berke­ley when a vol­un­teer logs onto the Net to surf or check e‑mail. SETI sci­en­tists will take a clos­er look at any­thing that looks inter­est­ing. The vol­un­teer need do noth­ing, except watch a jazzy screen­saver that shows the data being processed.

And here’s the kick­er. If an intel­li­gent sig­nal is detect­ed in your chunk of data by your com­put­er, you will get co-cred­it for mak­ing what will sure­ly be the great­est sci­en­tif­ic dis­cov­ery of all time — the dis­cov­ery of non-human intel­li­gent life in the universe.

This is not the first time net­works of com­put­ers have been har­nessed for a com­mon task. SETI@home is an exam­ple of what is called dis­trib­uted pro­cess­ing, a hot top­ic among com­put­er the­o­rists, made even hot­ter by the grow­ing con­nec­tive pow­er of the Internet.

Dis­trib­uted pro­cess­ing has obvi­ous advan­tages for SETI. It har­ness lots of idle com­put­er pow­er cheap­ly. More to the point, it is a bril­liant pub­lic rela­tions ploy, win­ning lots of new friends for the SETI pro­gram and the Plan­e­tary Soci­ety. Like all pub­licly fund­ed sci­en­tif­ic research, SETI depends pow­er­ful­ly upon hav­ing an avid and artic­u­late polit­i­cal constituency.

There is also a pay­off for the rest of us: SETI@home brings sci­ence to the people.

The alien­ation of sci­ence from soci­ety is one of the seri­ous prob­lems of our time. Our civ­i­liza­tion is based on the sci­en­tif­ic way of know­ing, but most peo­ple think of sci­en­tists as cold drones in white coats who talk in baf­fling lan­guages and spend lots of tax­pay­er mon­ey on eso­teric trivia.

Now, the pro­lif­er­a­tion of pow­er­ful per­son­al com­put­ers and fast con­nec­tions to the Inter­net make it pos­si­ble for ordi­nary folks to get involved.

And not only by watch­ing a pret­ty screen­saver. Clever hack­ers will sure­ly fig­ure out ways to crunch the Areci­bo data with pro­grams of their own devis­ing, maybe even one-upping the folks at Berkeley.

Would­n’t it be some­thing if a bright young kid work­ing in a vil­lage in India, say, teased out an intel­li­gent sig­nal that no one else thought to look for.

It is easy to think of oth­er areas of sci­ence where ama­teur com­put­er buffs could make sub­stan­tial con­tri­bu­tions. An orga­ni­za­tion called Distributed.Net, which dubs itself “The Largest Com­put­er on Earth,” has har­nessed net­worked per­son­al com­put­er pow­er to solve com­plex prob­lems of cryp­tog­ra­phy and num­ber theory.

Arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence is anoth­er top­ic that lends itself to dis­trib­uted pro­cess­ing. Net­works of per­son­al com­put­ers resem­ble the neur­al struc­ture of the human brain. A web of inter­act­ing com­put­ers, appro­pri­ate­ly pro­grammed and with access to inter­est­ing “sen­so­ry expe­ri­ence,” might be taught to behave intelligently.

Per­haps sci­en­tists who col­lect cer­tain kinds of data with pub­lic mon­ey should be required to put their raw data on the Inter­net as soon as it is col­lect­ed, so that any­one, any­where, can have a crack at mak­ing dis­cov­er­ies. Sci­en­tists won’t like this sug­ges­tion — it’s like giv­ing away the store before they’ve made their killing — but the inte­gra­tion of sci­ence into soci­ety may be a more impor­tant goal than pre­serv­ing the pro­pri­etary rights of indi­vid­ual sci­en­tists to their data.

Mean­while, SETI@home has been up and run­ning on my com­put­er for sev­er­al weeks and has processed a dozen blocks of data. It’s a no-brain­er on my part, like buy­ing a tick­et for the lot­tery, but there’s always a chance — astro­nom­i­cal­ly slim though it may be — that my com­put­er con­tains the chip that will hear the mes­sage from the stars.


The SETI@home project ceased send­ing new data pack­ets to dis­trib­uted users in March 2020, after over 20 years in oper­a­tion. The Areci­bo Tele­scope was irrepara­bly dam­aged by Hur­ri­cane Maria in 2017 and was sub­se­quent­ly decom­mis­sioned. ‑Ed

Share this Musing: