Lest the tap run dry

Lest the tap run dry

Hetch Hetchy Dam, Yosmite National Park, California • Photo by tosh chiang (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 11 March 1991

In the last years of the 19th cen­tu­ry, the thirsty cit­i­zens of San Fran­cis­co cov­etous­ly turned their eyes on the Hetch Hetchy Val­ley of the Tuolumne Riv­er in Yosemite Nation­al Park. A dam across the val­ley, a 150-mile-long aque­duct, and the city’s water sup­ply prob­lems would be solved forever.

The nat­u­ral­ist John Muir, who had worked hard to pre­serve the wild rivers of Yosemite for the nation, was aghast.

Dam Hetch Hetchy!” he cried, unbe­liev­ing­ly. “As well [we should] dam for water tanks the peo­ple’s cathe­drals and church­es, for no holi­er tem­ple has ever been con­se­crat­ed by the heart of man.”

The val­ley was dammed, the aque­duct built. But the solu­tion was­n’t forever.

Today, San Fran­cis­co is again thirsty for water. In fact, the entire state of Cal­i­for­nia is thirsty. Dozens of dams and hun­dreds of miles of aque­ducts haven’t kept up with the state’s explod­ing, water-guz­zling pop­u­la­tion. A five-year drought has made things worse. Damming more wild val­leys won’t solve the prob­lem. Hard­ly a drop of rain falls upon the state that isn’t present­ly chan­neled for human use.

Of all the gifts of civ­i­liza­tion, the end­less­ly gush­ing tap is the one we take most for grant­ed. Now, for Cal­i­for­ni­ans, and per­haps for the rest of us, the tap is run­ning dry.

De-mystification of water

The sto­ry of cheap, plen­ti­ful pub­lic water is part of the sto­ry of sci­ence. The sto­ry begins with the de-mys­ti­fi­ca­tion of water dur­ing the Sci­en­tif­ic Rev­o­lu­tion of the 16th and 17th cen­turies. Priests and water divin­ers yield­ed their sway over water to physi­cians and engi­neers, and holy fonts and sacred springs gave way to lab­o­ra­to­ry flasks and beakers. When chemists demon­strat­ed late in the 18th cen­tu­ry that water is cre­at­ed when hydro­gen is burned in oxy­gen, the sacred liq­uid became plain H2O.

Now, at least, folks knew what pure water was meant to be. The dis­tinc­tion between pure water and waste water became appar­ent. Riv­er com­mu­ni­ties began to take their drink­ing water from upstream of sew­er out­falls, but no one yet wor­ried about towns far­ther down the river.

Dur­ing the 19th cen­tu­ry, sci­en­tists demon­strat­ed a con­nec­tion between pure water and pub­lic health. Civic com­mis­sions began inspect­ing pub­lic water sup­plies and were star­tled to find (accord­ing to one gov­ern­ment report) “leech­es, small jump­ing ani­mals that looked like shrimp, oily creams” and “fetid black deposits.” And that was only what met the eye. Undoubt­ed­ly, the water was also thick with microor­gan­isms and chem­i­cal contaminants.

By the end of the cen­tu­ry, fil­tra­tion and chem­i­cal treat­ment were com­mon, and out­breaks of typhoid fever and cholera became less fre­quent. It had tak­en 400 years to rec­og­nize that cer­tain dis­ease epi­demics had more to do with the puri­ty of pub­lic water sup­plies than with God’s wrath.

Boston was the first Amer­i­can town to estab­lish a water­works, in 1652, bring­ing water by grav­i­ty from springs out­side the city (New York did not get around to a pub­lic water sup­ply until 1799).

The Met­ro­pol­i­tan Water Dis­trict of Mass­a­chu­setts, set up in 1895 to sup­ply Boston and its sub­urbs, was the first region­al water sup­ply sys­tem in the Unit­ed States. That was the hero­ic age of pub­lic water engi­neer­ing, when vast sys­tems of reser­voirs and aque­ducts were cre­at­ed to sup­ply Amer­i­can cities, includ­ing the damming of Hetch Hetchy by San Francisco.

New megaprojects

The 1990s promise to be a sec­ond hero­ic age in the his­to­ry of Boston’s pub­lic water. Huge projects are under way to improve the sup­ply from the Quab­bin and Wachusett reser­voirs, by reha­bil­i­tat­ing the Sud­bury Aque­duct and exca­vat­ing new tun­nels, and to clean up the more than 500 mil­lion gal­lons of par­tial­ly-treat­ed waste water that pour dai­ly into Boston Harbor.

But these megapro­jects may fail to keep the tap flow­ing (and just watch those water rates climb). We have become a nation of water squan­der­ers. In South­ern Cal­i­for­nia, a typ­i­cal sin­gle-fam­i­ly house con­sumes 140 gal­lons of water per per­son per day. It’s ask­ing a lot of nature, already much abused, to keep up with that sort of demand.

We take for grant­ed our cou­ple of show­ers a day, a sham­poo with every show­er. We flush out toi­lets after every use, no mat­ter how minor. By let­ting the water run con­tin­u­ous­ly at full force, some Amer­i­cans use five gal­lons of water to brush their teeth. Every back­yard has a swim­ming pool, or every back­yard own­er wants one. Lawns are lush and green, even in the desert. One won­ders if by the end of the next cen­tu­ry any riv­er in Amer­i­ca will be allowed to run unhar­nessed to the sea.

If it had­n’t been for cranky envi­ron­men­tal­ists like John Muir, even Yosemite Val­ley and the Grand Canyon might have been turned into giant reser­voirs to slake the thirst of Amer­i­cans. Once, when Muir was guid­ing Pres­i­dent Taft around Yosemite, the pres­i­dent point­ed to the majes­tic gate­way to the val­ley and teas­ing­ly said, “Fine place for a dam.”

Muir’s eyes flashed fire. “The men who would dam that,” he said, “would be damn­ing himself.”

Share this Musing: