Leaving our print on the landscape

Leaving our print on the landscape

"Summer Evening" by Childe Hassam (1886)

Originally published 25 November 2003

The Flo­rence Gris­wold Muse­um in Old Lyme, Con­necti­cut, is one of New Eng­land’s hid­den trea­sures. Next time you are dri­ving Inter­state 95 between Boston and New York, pop off at Exit 70 and treat your­self to an exhil­a­rat­ing look at ear­ly 20th-cen­tu­ry Amer­i­can Impres­sion­ist art.

This is the place where Amer­i­can Impres­sion­ism was born, in 1903, when the land­scape painter Childe Has­sam took up res­i­dence in Miss Flo­rence Gris­wold’s board­ing house.

The house was orig­i­nal­ly the home of sea cap­tain Robert Gris­wold. For much of the ear­ly 19th cen­tu­ry it was the finest man­sion in town, and Old Lyme was a thriv­ing sea­port. Then came steam-pow­ered ves­sels, and the for­tunes of the town and the Gris­wold fam­i­ly fell into decline. By the end of the cen­tu­ry, Flo­rence, one of four Gris­wold chil­dren, was tak­ing in board­ers to make ends meet.

When Has­sam arrived, the Gris­wold house had already become a fledg­ling artist colony. Under Has­sam’s influ­ence, Old Lyme became a live­ly cen­ter of Impres­sion­ist paint­ing, called the “Amer­i­can Giverny,” after Claude Mon­et’s home in France. “Miss Flo­rence” was the colony’s guardian angel.

The Gris­wold man­sion is now a show­case for paint­ings of the artists who lived and worked there. Near­by, a glis­ten­ing new muse­um build­ing exhibits a broad­er range of art — includ­ing con­tem­po­rary art — in the con­text of Amer­i­can Impressionism.

As I admired the muse­um’s col­lec­tion of stun­ning land­scapes — rivers, marsh­es, mead­ows, crag­gy out­crops, rugged sea­coast — paint­ed in and around Old Lyme, I could not help but think of a recent report of the Mass­a­chu­setts Audubon Soci­ety, describ­ing how New Eng­land’s remain­ing unspoiled land­scapes are being heed­less­ly destroyed. Accord­ing to the report, every day 40 acres of Mass­a­chu­setts for­est, farm­land, and open space are being devel­oped, most­ly to build homes. The homes are big­ger than ever, and sit on larg­er lots, though fam­i­lies are shrink­ing in size.

It’s the ‘man­sion­iza­tion’ of Mass­a­chu­setts,” says Jack Clarke, direc­tor of advo­ca­cy for Mass Audubon.

Sen­si­ble plan­ning, man­dat­ing small­er hous­es on small­er lots adja­cent to already built-up areas, would help pre­serve New Eng­land’s nat­ur­al beau­ty and wildlife habi­tats, with some part of devel­op­ment costs set aside for towns to buy up remain­ing green spaces. Instead, we have res­i­den­tial sprawl and strip-mall com­mer­cial devel­op­ment that reach­es from town to town.

Land­scapes that might have inspired Old Lyme artists a hun­dred years ago are lost.

Land­scapes can inspire art. And art can inspire land­scapes. The Old Lyme Impres­sion­ists were work­ing at the same time that Charles Eliot and oth­er dis­ci­ples of the Amer­i­can land­scape archi­tect Fred­er­ick Law Olm­st­ed were cre­at­ing art­ful land­scapes such as the Mid­dle­sex Fells and Blue Hills Reser­va­tions near Boston.

What Eliot said to the Boston Trustees of Reser­va­tions in 1891 might have been a pref­ace to the Audubon report: “Here is a com­mu­ni­ty, said to be the rich­est and most enlight­ened in Amer­i­ca, which yet allows its finest scenes of nat­ur­al beau­ty to be destroyed one by one, regard­less of the fact that the great city of the future which is to fill this land would cer­tain­ly prize every such scene exceed­ing­ly, and would glad­ly help to pay the cost of pre­serv­ing them today.”

For many con­ser­va­tion­ists, “nat­ur­al” means “non-human.” They urge us to leave wild places alone. It is too late for that. Human con­scious­ness is as nat­ur­al a prod­uct of evo­lu­tion as blue­birds or great blue whales, and it trumps all oth­er kinds of organ­ic life. Like it or not, the entire sur­face of the plan­et Earth is going to be a human artifact.

But an arti­fact can be art­ful. We must work to achieve land­scapes that hon­or the organ­ic and respect oth­er crea­tures, land­scapes that pro­vide relief from the “too insis­tent­ly man-made sur­round­ings of civ­i­lized life,” to quote Olm­st­ed. Not wild nature, to be sure, but nature tamed by con­scious intent.

The paint­ings of the ear­ly 20th-cen­tu­ry Amer­i­can Impres­sion­ists show us how land­scape can ele­vate the human spir­it. Olm­st­ed and his dis­ci­ples taught us that art can ele­vate land­scape. Our task is to see that the ener­gy flows both ways, and that the sur­face of the plan­et becomes itself a work of sub­lime art.

Share this Musing: