In search of the soul

In search of the soul

Photo by Marc Schulte on Unsplash

Originally published 31 July 2005

The philoso­pher René Descartes insist­ed that body and soul are sep­a­rate things. “I think, there­fore I am,” he famous­ly said. His “am” was not flesh and bone.

Sci­ence over­whelm­ing­ly refutes Descartes. “I am, there­fore I think,” is clos­er to the mod­ern view. The soul as a thing sep­a­rate from the body has been hunt­ed to its lair. The lair is empty.

Biol­o­gy and neu­ro­science have not found the slight­est evi­dence that a human self can exist inde­pen­dent­ly of the body — not even a glim­mer of body-soul dualism.

What­ev­er the soul is, it is inex­tri­ca­bly wrapped in flesh. We are, for bet­ter or worse, think­ing meat.

So what, then, is a self?

We might begin our search for self in the tril­lions of cells that make up our bod­ies, which share the same genes. Foren­sic sci­en­tists can iden­ti­fy the per­pe­tra­tor of a crime from a sin­gle hair or drop of semen. To the DNA sci­en­tist, a scrap of my skin is rec­og­niz­ably me.

A sec­ond approach to self is embed­ded in the human immune sys­tem. Our bod­ies have aston­ish­ing­ly com­plex defens­es against non-self invaders that can cause us harm. If it weren’t for our immune sys­tems, non-self pathogens and par­a­sites might quick­ly destroy us. How the body rec­og­nizes threat­en­ing non-self (germs, snake ven­om) from harm­less non-self (food, fetus) is one of the most intrigu­ing prob­lems being inves­ti­gat­ed in sci­ence today, and one of para­mount impor­tance to medicine.

Of course, none of this is what we usu­al­ly mean by self when we say “I love you,” “I’m depressed,” “I stubbed my toe,” or “You deceive your­self.” Per­son­al pro­nouns assume a self that is more than genet­ics or immunol­o­gy. But even this con­scious self — this tan­gle of remem­bered expe­ri­ence — is embed­ded in col­lec­tions of inter­act­ing neu­rons, as brain stud­ies make crys­tal clear.

The ner­vous sys­tems of high­er ani­mals pre­sum­ably evolved out of the need for cen­tral con­trol of the body’s many organs — heart, lungs, vis­cera, liv­er, adren­al medul­la. Clear­ly, any sys­tem capa­ble of coor­di­nat­ing a body-wide response to dan­ger sig­nals, or even to coor­di­nate the need for rest and diges­tion, has a high sur­vival val­ue and will be favored by nat­ur­al selection.

Even­tu­al­ly, evolv­ing ner­vous sys­tems gave rise to the human brain and self-awareness.

As the crea­ture with the most com­plex ner­vous sys­tem, we like to think of our­selves as some­how qual­i­ta­tive­ly dif­fer­ent from oth­er ani­mals; thus our affec­tion for the idea of a unique­ly human dis­em­bod­ied soul. We like to imag­ine that our self­hood can float free of our phys­i­cal bodies.

But every­thing we have learned about the human self — from genet­ics, immunol­o­gy, neu­ro­bi­ol­o­gy, and repro­duc­tive sci­ence — con­firms that our self­hood is only the most elab­o­rate of evo­lu­tion’s many lev­els of cel­lu­lar organization.

To my way of think­ing, this does not low­er our stature in the uni­verse, but rather makes us part and par­cel of the great­est mir­a­cle of all — life’s grand thumb­ing-of-its-nose at nature’s law of entropy, which requires the uni­verse to even­tu­al­ly grind every com­plex­i­ty to dust.

Many of us were raised to believe in a self that only tem­porar­i­ly resides in a phys­i­cal frame. The soul is there at the begin­ning, we were told, ful­ly formed, in the fer­til­ized egg. It sur­vives the body’s death and lives for­ev­er. This idea of an imma­te­r­i­al, immor­tal self is per­haps the most cher­ished of human beliefs. We cling to it. We des­per­ate­ly want it to be true.

But not a whit of empir­i­cal evi­dence con­firms its existence.

I look at the tril­lions of inter­act­ing cells that are my body, the webs of flick­er­ing neu­rons that are my con­scious­ness, and I see a self vast­ly more majes­tic than the pal­try lit­tle soul illus­trat­ed in my grade-school cat­e­chism as a white cir­cle besmirched with sin. The more I learn about the machin­ery of life and con­scious­ness, the more pro­found­ly mirac­u­lous the self becomes.

We are earth, air, fire, and water made con­scious. The self comes into exis­tence slow­ly as cells divide, mul­ti­ply and spe­cial­ize, guid­ed by the DNA, orga­nized by expe­ri­ence. When the orga­ni­za­tion of cells dis­in­te­grates, the self is gone.

If to have a soul means any­thing at all, it means to be con­fi­dent in our spe­cial­ness, our unique­ness, our indi­vid­ual sig­nif­i­cance in the unfold­ing cos­mos. It means to believe that every human life is pre­cious and capa­ble of ennobling the universe.

The Judeo-Chris­t­ian Scrip­tures tell us that God cre­at­ed the first human being out of the slime of the earth, breathed life into his cre­ation and pro­nounced it good. The myth is con­sis­tent with our cur­rent under­stand­ing of the nature of the soul. Accord­ing to the best con­tem­po­rary sci­ence, we are lit­er­al­ly ani­mat­ed slime. Now we must re-learn to think our­selves “good.”

Share this Musing: