In a health care crisis, antidotes to despair

In a health care crisis, antidotes to despair

Bone marrow being drawn from a donor • US Navy photo (Public Domain)

Originally published 15 June 1992

It is easy to get down on doc­tors and med­i­cine. Med­ical costs keep sky­rock­et­ing, ser­vices become more and more imper­son­al, and the waits in line become longer and longer. Even the edi­tor of the Jour­nal of the Amer­i­can Med­ical Asso­ci­a­tion recent­ly pre­dict­ed that the med­ical sys­tem is head­ing toward “melt­down.”

It will require her­culean effort and polit­i­cal wis­dom to give the Amer­i­can peo­ple med­ical care that is afford­able, humane, and avail­able to all — per­haps more effort and wis­dom than we can col­lec­tive­ly muster. Yes, it is easy to get down — and good to be remind­ed now and then that things are not as bad as they some­times seem.

Two books affirm the gen­uine strengths of Amer­i­can med­i­cine: Lewis Thomas’s This Frag­ile Species, a col­lec­tion of essays recount­ing a life­time in med­i­cine; and Made­line Mar­get’s Life’s Blood, a sto­ry of Dr. Joel Rappe­port and the sci­ence of bone mar­row transplants.

Lewis Thomas arrived at Har­vard Med­ical School in 1933. In those days, there was not much in the physi­cian’s bag of tricks: dig­i­tal­is for heart fail­ure, insulin for dia­betes, liv­er extract for per­ni­cious ane­mia, and a few oth­er drugs of frac­tion­al mer­it. Many “ther­a­pies” of ear­li­er times — bleed­ing the patient, for exam­ple — were known to be inef­fec­tive or down­right dan­ger­ous. By and large, the med­ical stu­dent was expect­ed to learn enough about the course of dis­eases to make accu­rate diag­noses and rea­son­ably prob­a­bilis­tic prog­noses and after that, not to meddle.

Then came the dis­cov­ery of sul­fon­amides and peni­cillin. Bac­te­ria could be killed with­out killing the patient. It was not just an amaze­ment, writes Thomas, it was a revolution.

These new forms of treat­ment were based upon fun­da­men­tal sci­en­tif­ic research, test­ing with exper­i­men­tal ani­mals and con­trolled exper­i­ments with human beings. Sud­den­ly it was pos­si­ble to cure pneu­mo­nia, strep­to­coc­cal sep­ticemia, menin­gi­tis, syphilis, tuber­cu­lo­sis, typhoid, and typhus. In that first flush of suc­cess, noth­ing seemed impossible.

It turned out that it was­n’t so easy. Many dis­eases remain intractable. Can­cer, AIDS, and chron­ic dis­eases of agin, among oth­er mal­adies, frus­trate efforts to find a cure. But Thomas is opti­mistic. He is espe­cial­ly upbeat about the part­ner­ship of basic bio­log­i­cal research and clin­i­cal prac­tice — the PhD bent over a petri dish and the MD at the patien­t’s bedside.

For those of us who watch the progress of med­i­cine from the out­side, the part­ner­ship of basic research and clin­i­cal prac­tice some­times seems strained to the break­ing point. Almost every week we read of squab­bles and con­tro­ver­sies, often pit­ting doc­tors in hos­pi­tals against sci­en­tists of the Nation­al Insti­tutes of Health. Should the mon­ey be spent on the search for a cure, or on pre­ven­tion? Should doc­tors bold­ly exper­i­ment on human patients, or prac­tice cau­tious neglect? And what, in all of this, is the role of ambi­tion, glam­our, and publicity?

In the midst of this con­tentious­ness, Lewis Thomas’s gen­tle wis­dom and infec­tious opti­mism is an effec­tive anti­dote for despair.

Made­line Mar­get gives us a more inti­mate look inside the med­ical estab­lish­ment. She has writ­ten a warm, thought­ful, and care­ful­ly researched book about the prac­tice of mod­ern, high-tech med­i­cine, from the point of view of the patient. And she, too, is upbeat.

Mar­get became inter­est­ed in hema­tol­ogy (the sci­ence of blood) and bone mar­row trans­plants when she served as a mar­row donor for her sis­ter. The doc­tor who treat­ed her sis­ter was Joel Rappe­port of Yale Uni­ver­si­ty. Grumpy, disheveled, bril­liant, com­pas­sion­ate, inde­fati­ga­ble, Rappe­port is the life force behind Mar­get’s story.

Bone mar­row, a sub­stance that looks like straw­ber­ry jel­lo, is the body’s blood pro­duc­er. If the mar­row fails, we die. A trans­plant is a res­cue mis­sion. First the patien­t’s dis­eased mar­row is destroyed with drugs or radi­a­tion. Then it is replaced with healthy mar­row. In effect, the physi­cian kills the patient, then brings her back to life. The process is dan­ger­ous and painful for the patient. The pay­off is life for a per­son not ready to die.

Mar­get’s sto­ry is a page-turn­er, a grip­ping account of life and death — of doc­tors, researchers, patients, and fam­i­lies. She does not neglect the sci­ence: the beau­ti­ful chem­istry of blood, the mys­ter­ies of cells, the mag­ic (white and black) of genes. Here, too, are the con­tro­ver­sies between PhDs and MDs, the glo­ry and per­son­al cost of doing world-class med­i­cine, and the com­plex motives that dri­ve research for­ward. Mar­get nev­er lets us for­get the indi­vid­ual human sto­ries behind every sci­en­tif­ic decision.

The sci­ence of bone mar­row trans­plants goes back to the 1950s, when the first trans­plants were per­formed on mice as part of research on atom­ic ener­gy. When Rappe­port par­tic­i­pat­ed in his first bone mar­row trans­plant in 1964, as a fourth-year med­ical stu­dent, the patient imme­di­ate­ly died. Now he cures half the peo­ple he treats. A 50 per­cent suc­cess rate means a 50 per­cent fail­ure rate. Mar­get asked Rappe­port how he bears so much dying; he replied that a lot more peo­ple died when he started.

A lot of folks who died 40 years ago, of all sorts of dis­eases, might live today. For all of its stag­ger­ing prob­lems, Amer­i­can med­i­cine may just be the best in the world, and doc­tors like Lewis Thomas and Joel Rappe­port help make it so.

Now — if we can just fig­ure out how to pay for it.

Share this Musing: