Gods no longer

Gods no longer

Chromolithograph of the “Great East River Suspension Bridge,” 1883 • Currier and Ives (Public Domain)

Originally published 9 May 1988

New York’s bridges are falling down.

Accord­ing to a [1988] report in the New York Times, about a third of the city’s two thou­sand bridges are con­sid­ered to be struc­tural­ly defi­cient. More than thir­ty have been closed to traf­fic. The prob­lem is poor main­te­nance. Appar­ent­ly the city has nei­ther the mon­ey nor the will to keep the bridges in repair.

The issue came to a head sev­er­al weeks ago with the dra­mat­ic clos­ing of the 85-year-old Williams­burg Bridge, the sec­ond old­est of the city’s major bridges and a vital road and rail link between Man­hat­tan and Brook­lyn. Trans­porta­tion between the two bor­oughs has been severe­ly disrupted.

The week they closed the Williams­burg Bridge, I found myself walk­ing across the Brook­lyn Bridge, the old­est of New York’s bridges, and the only one of the three East Riv­er sus­pen­sion bridges in rea­son­ably good health. The walk was the ful­fill­ment of a life­long ambi­tion to see close-up the struc­ture that more than any oth­er in North Amer­i­ca epit­o­mizes the Gold­en Age of civ­il engineering.

The Brook­lyn Bridge is more than a link between two shores. From the moment it was opened to traf­fic in 1883, it has been a unique sym­bol of the Amer­i­can spir­it. Even today, in a city a spec­tac­u­lar bridges, tun­nels, and sky­scrap­ers, the Brook­lyn Bridge con­tin­ues to stir the mind and heart like no oth­er work of engineering.

Like crossing a rainbow

The pow­er of the bridge is not the pow­er of scale, although the scale is cer­tain­ly grand. A walk across the bridge on a fine day is like cross­ing a rain­bow cast over a great city. Even the tow­ers of the World Trade Cen­ter, not far from the Man­hat­tan ter­mi­nus of the bridge, seem some­how small­er. Look­ing down from the bridge on the restored 19th cen­tu­ry build­ings of South­port — New York’s equiv­a­lent of Boston’s Quin­cy Mar­ket — one gets a sense of what the view from the bridge must have been like in 1883, when the mas­sive gran­ite tow­ers that sup­port the sus­pen­sion cables were the tallest struc­tures in the city, except­ing only the tip of the spire of Trin­i­ty Church.

It was a time of extra­or­di­nary achieve­ments in civ­il engi­neer­ing. In the pre­vi­ous decade-and-a-half, the con­ti­nent had been spanned by a rail­road, a three-arched bridge was thrown across the Mis­sis­sip­pi at St. Louis, and a 5‑mile-long rail­road tun­nel was dri­ven through Hoosac Moun­tain in Mass­a­chu­setts. From coast to coast the nation was being bound togeth­er by great works of steel and stone.

These works were pub­lic struc­tures, emblems of civic pride, enhanc­ing the move­ments of peo­ple, speed­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and gen­er­at­ing nation­al wealth. And the civ­il engi­neers who built these won­ders stand out in our his­to­ry books like minor gods. Fore­most among them were those com­plex and dif­fi­cult genius­es, John and Wash­ing­ton Roe­bling, father and son, archi­tect and builder of the Brook­lyn Bridge.

With the Brook­lyn Bridge, the glo­ry days of Amer­i­can civ­il engi­neer­ing reached their apogee. From that moment for­ward, the thrust of his­to­ry was away from com­mu­nal enter­pris­es and toward the mate­r­i­al enrich­ment of indi­vid­u­als. The next great wave of inven­tor-engi­neers — Edi­son, Ford, Bell — were cre­ators of goods for pri­vate con­sump­tion. In our own cen­tu­ry, works of pub­lic engi­neer­ing have come to be tak­en for granted.

What we were — and have become

Almost unique­ly, the Brook­lyn Bridge con­tin­ues to cast its spell. It has long since ceased to be the biggest bridge in New York. The Ver­razano Nar­rows Bridge has more than twice the span and tow­ers twice as high. Some might even say that the Ver­razano is the more beau­ti­ful bridge. Still, my long-antic­i­pat­ed walk across the Brook­lyn Bridge had all of the mag­ic I expect­ed that it might. What I expe­ri­enced was not so much a sense of phys­i­cal awe, as a sense of his­to­ry — of what we once were and what we have become.

At the cen­ter of the pedes­tri­an prom­e­nade, one can reach out one’s hand and touch the 16-inch thick cables that sup­port the struc­ture. The man­u­fac­ture of steel cables made the Roe­bling fam­i­ly rich. But the mass­ing of wealth is not what drove John and Wash­ing­ton Roe­bling in the con­cep­tion and exe­cu­tion of their great project. Both men rec­og­nized that their bridge was an instru­ment for serv­ing the nation­al des­tiny. Both men suf­fered griev­ous­ly (John Roe­bling lost his life) in the com­ple­tion of the work.

As its name sug­gests, civ­il engi­neer­ing is engi­neer­ing in the ser­vice of the com­mon weal. If you want to know how civ­il engi­neer­ing fares today, ask the stu­dents who are embark­ing upon engi­neer­ing careers. Civ­il engi­neer­ing has fall­en low in their esteem. The most glam­orous fields of engi­neer­ing are those that pro­duce goods for pri­vate consumption.

The Stat­ue of Lib­er­ty and the Brook­lyn Bridge stand at the gate­way of the nation as two sym­bols of the Amer­i­can spir­it. The one cel­e­brates per­son­al free­dom; the oth­er cel­e­brates the exer­cise of that free­dom for the pub­lic good. Per­haps a third of New York’s bridges are falling down because we have for­got­ten the mean­ing of one of the two sym­bol­ic struc­tures in New York Harbor.

Share this Musing: