Genetic science tests our wisdom

Genetic science tests our wisdom

A mosquito of the genus Anopheles • Jim Gathany/CDC (Public Domain)

Originally published 22 October 2002

Malar­ia kills more than a mil­lion peo­ple a year, most of them chil­dren under the age of 5 in sub-Saha­ran Africa. Hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple have the dis­ease, in vary­ing degrees of severity.

The name malar­ia means “bad air.” The dank air of marshy land was long thought to cause the dis­ease. In the 19th cen­tu­ry, mos­qui­toes were fin­gered as the culprit.

But mos­qui­toes are no more the cause of malar­ia than bad air. The agent of infec­tion is a nasty lit­tle par­a­site named Plas­mod­i­um fal­ci­parum that requires two oth­er species to com­plete its life cycle — the mos­qui­to Anophe­les gam­bi­ae, and the pri­mate Homo sapi­ens.

That’s us.

Plas­mod­i­um does­n’t bear us any grudge. From the par­a­site’s point of view, we are a use­ful (and nec­es­sary) blob of meat in which to breed.

Here’s how it works.

An infect­ed female Anophe­les mos­qui­to bites a human and injects par­a­sites into the vic­tim’s bloodstream.

The par­a­sites make their way to the liv­er and multiply.

The teem­ing par­a­sites explode from the liv­er cells back into the blood­stream, where they invade red blood cells and mul­ti­ply again. They fill the cells to burst­ing, then invade more red blood cells. Again. And again. The malar­ia vic­tim sus­tain bouts of fever with each cycle of cell infection.

If an unin­fect­ed female Anophe­les mos­qui­to bites an infect­ed human, she sucks up par­a­sites with her blood meal. These mul­ti­ply in her stom­ach wall, then make their way to her sali­vary glands, ready for trans­fer to anoth­er human.

And so it goes, around and around — human liv­er, human blood, mos­qui­to stom­ach, mos­qui­to sali­vary gland. Each stage of Plas­mod­i­um’s life cycle involves a spe­cial­ized form of the par­a­site. No oth­er hosts will do but Homo sapi­ens and Anophe­les gambiae.

There’s no moral dimen­sion to the sto­ry, no clash of good and evil. Plas­mod­i­um is just mak­ing a liv­ing in the way that is pro­grammed into its genes. The mos­qui­to, too, just wants her din­ner. And Homo sapi­ens? Well, we’ve cer­tain­ly made a lot of our­selves. It would be sur­pris­ing if oth­er crea­tures did not make use of so much read­i­ly avail­able protein.

And when you think about it, the sto­ry is all about pro­teins. Pro­teins that let the par­a­site latch into human liv­er cells, and into red blood cells. Pro­teins that let the par­a­site attach itself to the mos­qui­to’s stom­ach wall, and then allow it to make its way to the mos­qui­to’s sali­vary gland. Twisty pro­tein mol­e­cules that meet and fit togeth­er like lock and key. A gor­geous dance of geometry.

And where do all these spe­cial­ized pro­teins come from? The instruc­tions for mak­ing them are all there, writ­ten in a four-let­ter chem­i­cal code on Plas­mod­i­um’s DNA.

Which has now been sequenced.

You can see a beau­ti­ful col­or-cod­ed map of the malar­ia par­a­site’s DNA in the Octo­ber 3 2002 issue of the jour­nal Nature. An esti­mat­ed 5,300 genes on 14 chro­mo­somes, 23 mil­lion steps on the spi­ral stair­case of the DNA’s dou­ble helix, the score for Plas­mod­i­um’s sym­pho­ny of life, packed into every cell of a crea­ture small enough to hide in a mos­qui­to’s spit.

Here are the instruc­tions for mak­ing pro­teins that con­trol devel­op­ment of the par­a­site at each stage of its life cycle. Pro­teins for metab­o­lism, cell repro­duc­tion, cell motil­i­ty, stress response, cell com­mu­ni­ca­tion, cell death. Pro­teins that bind and sig­nal and trans­port and invade. Pro­teins that con­trol the mak­ing of oth­er pro­teins — untan­gling the DNA, detect­ing and repair­ing errors.

It’s breath­tak­ing. Behind the human tragedy — the dying chil­dren, the fits of fever — the chem­i­cal music of life plays on.

The genet­ic code of the Anophe­les mos­qui­to has now been sequenced, too; you can see it dis­played schemat­i­cal­ly in the Octo­ber 4 2002 issue of Sci­ence. And, of course, the human genome was revealed last year. So sci­en­tists have the genet­ic codes for all three crea­tures impli­cat­ed in malaria.

Knowl­edge is pow­er. The sequenced genomes of the malar­ia par­a­site and the Anophe­les mos­qui­to give sci­en­tists a leg up in the search for effec­tive drugs and vac­cines. They also will facil­i­tate mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the par­a­site’s or the mos­qui­to’s genes in ways that might dis­rupt Plas­mod­i­um’s life cycle — rid­ding the human species of one more mor­tal plague.

But genet­ic mod­i­fi­ca­tion of any crea­ture’s code of life is fraught with dan­gers for the web of life, many of which are not yet ful­ly under­stood. Knowl­edge is pow­er for good or ill. The promis­es and per­ils of genet­ic engi­neer­ing will test the wis­dom of nature’s only moral species.

The best insur­ance that this new pow­er will be used wise­ly is a cit­i­zen­ry solid­ly edu­cat­ed in both the sci­ences and the arts. The deci­sions to be made are high­ly tech­ni­cal, and must be based on sci­en­tif­ic knowl­edge. They are far too impor­tant to be left to scientists.

Share this Musing: