From terrible violence came the elements of life

From terrible violence came the elements of life

The doomed star Eta Carinae • Jon Morse/NASA/STScI (Public Domain)

Originally published 4 May 1998

Author Doris Less­ing began her sci-fi chron­i­cle of space with this ded­i­ca­tion: “For my father, who used to sit, hour after hour, night after night, out­side our home in Africa, watch­ing the stars. ‘Well,’ he would say,‘if we blow our­selves up, there’s plen­ty more where we came from.’ ”

Oh, there’s plen­ty more, all right; stars span­gle the sky in uncount­able num­bers. And they’re blow­ing up all the time.

The biggest stars live fast and die young in explo­sive events called novas and super­novas. The stars we see with our unaid­ed eyes tend to be among the most mas­sive and most lumi­nous, and are there­fore good can­di­dates for a big bang.

But human life is short com­pared to the lifes­pans of even the most short-lived stars. Less­ing’s father, in a life­time of watch­ing the sky, would be unlike­ly to see more than a few dying stars blow up. In my life­time, I have seen only one stel­lar erup­tion, the nova of August 1975, which for one glo­ri­ous evening blazed almost at bright as the near­by star Deneb in the con­stel­la­tion Cygnus, like a feath­er plucked from the swan’s tail.

The most famous super­no­va of recent times was vis­i­ble to the unaid­ed eye for a few months dur­ing the first half of 1987, but only for observers south of the equa­tor. This was a very big bang as stel­lar explo­sions go, but it was rather far away, in a small com­pan­ion galaxy of the Milky Way, and nev­er became bright enough to daz­zle the back­yard sky­watch­er. Eleven years lat­er, it con­tin­ues to put on a show for tele­scop­ic observers, as the star’s rem­nants race out­wards, col­lid­ing with the debris of pre­vi­ous, less vio­lent outbursts.

On almost any clear night, a per­sis­tent tele­scop­ic astronomer might observe a faint super­no­va in some dis­tant galaxy. A blowup can be expect­ed in a typ­i­cal spi­ral galaxy a cou­ple of times a cen­tu­ry. The last super­novas on our side of the Milky Way Galaxy hap­pened in 1572 and 1604, which means we are over­due for spec­tac­u­lar fireworks.

The 1572 event is called Tycho’s Super­no­va, after the great Dan­ish astronomer Tycho Bra­he, who demon­strat­ed con­clu­sive­ly that the bright new object was among the “fixed stars,” and that there­fore Aris­totle’s “immutable” heav­ens were sub­ject to change.

Tycho’s pro­tege Johannes Kepler observed and wrote about the super­no­va of 1604, which stim­u­lat­ed yet more pub­lic inter­est in all things celes­tial and gave a boost to the new sun-cen­tered sys­tem of Copernicus.

Both super­novas were brighter than any star in the sky, and remained vis­i­ble for months. Today, we turn our tele­scopes to the places in the heav­ens where the two “new stars” appeared and we see tat­ters of shat­tered starstuff.

The Milky Way Galaxy is lit­tered with dead and dying stars wrapped in col­or­ful shrouds of expelled mat­ter. In recent years, the Hub­ble Space Tele­scope has pho­tographed a spec­tac­u­lar gallery of stars in their death throes, puff­ing off lay­ers of their sub­stance or blow­ing them­selves to smithereens.

Per­haps the most dra­mat­ic Hub­ble image of a dying star is the super­giant Eta Cari­nae, 7,500 light-years away and one of the bright­est and most mas­sive stars we know about in the uni­verse: 4 mil­lion times more lumi­nous than the sun and 100 times more mas­sive. Eta Cari­nae is ripe to become a pyrotech­nic wonder.

About 150 years ago Eta Cari­nae under­went a mam­moth con­vul­sion, blast­ing out two sym­met­ric lobes of mat­ter weigh­ing as much as sev­er­al suns. The star (or per­haps it is two stars in a bina­ry sys­tem) sur­vived most­ly intact, but the flare-up may fore­tell more dra­mat­ic things to come.

The Hub­ble pho­to­graph of Eta Cari­nae evokes ter­rif­ic vio­lence. The seething globes of eject­ed mat­ter are expand­ing at hun­dreds of miles per sec­ond. Each of them bears a strik­ing resem­blance to the fire­ball of an atom­ic bomb explo­sion, although on a vast­ly dif­fer­ent scale. Each of the star’s fire­balls is present­ly 10,000 times big­ger than our solar system.

Eta Cari­nae is about three times clos­er to Earth than the stars that blew up in 1572 and 1604, so it promis­es a spec­tac­u­lar show if it goes super­no­va, brighter in our sky than Venus at its brightest.

Most stars that are like­ly can­di­dates for super­no­va are far enough away to present no dan­ger to Earth, so for the time being we can enjoy the beau­ty of the Hub­ble pho­tographs with­out undue wor­ry about being caught up in the trau­ma of star-death.

Sci­en­tists believe super­no­va explo­sions are forges for cre­at­ing heavy ele­ments. Every car­bon, nitro­gen, and oxy­gen atom in our bod­ies was prob­a­bly cre­at­ed in super­no­va explo­sions of stars that lived and died in the Milky Way Galaxy long before the Earth was born. If so, then we can look at the unleashed fury record­ed in the Hub­ble pho­tographs and know that these vio­lent star-deaths are nec­es­sary to seed the uni­verse with the ele­ments of life.

These ter­ri­ble and beau­ti­ful rem­nants of explod­ed stars are indeed “where we came from.”

Share this Musing: