Finding inspiration in a blue heron

Finding inspiration in a blue heron

A great blue heron takes to the air • Photo © Tom Raymo

Originally published 10 May 1999

If you have ever watched a jum­bo jet take off you will know what I mean.

The thing seems too mas­sive and mov­ing too slow­ly to remain sus­pend­ed on the air. It appears to be borne aloft by invis­i­ble cables, or drawn sky­wards by spell or incan­ta­tion. It sim­ply does not seem pos­si­ble that the ten­u­ous buoy­an­cy of air could lift those bulky tons.

And so it is watch­ing a great blue heron rise from the marsh. Star­tled, it heaves itself into flight, the great wings bil­low­ing like bed­sheets in a breeze, the neck arch­ing — pull, pull — the kite-string legs dan­gling behind. It’s too big. It’s not pos­si­ble. But nev­er­the­less it ris­es — majes­ti­cal­ly heavenward.

No oth­er New Eng­land bird cleaves the air with such grandeur. Not even the eagle or great horned owl con­veys such grace, in both mean­ings of the word: seem­ing­ly effort­less beau­ty or charm of move­ment, form or pro­por­tion; a gift bestowed by one who need not do so. The heron ris­es in mag­nif­i­cence and magnanimity.

How does it do it? What is the pow­er of this bird to touch our minds and hearts ?

The nat­u­ral­ist Aldo Leopold was inti­mate­ly famil­iar with the cranes of Wis­con­sin, cousins of our great blue herons, and won­dered often about their abil­i­ty to move us deeply. In A Sand Coun­ty Almanac he watch­es as a crane “springs his ungain­ly hulk into the air and flails the morn­ing sun with mighty wings.” Our abil­i­ty to per­ceive beau­ty in nature, as in art, begins with the pret­ty, he says, then moves into qual­i­ties of the beau­ti­ful yet uncap­tured by lan­guage. The beau­ty of the crane lies in this high­er realm, he pro­pos­es, “beyond the reach of words.”

Words may fail, but nev­er­the­less poets have tried to cap­ture the ineffable.

John Cia­r­di sees “a leap, a thrust, a long stroke through the cumu­lus of trees” and stops to praise “that bright orig­i­nal burst that lights the heron on his two soft kiss­ing kites.”

Theodore Roethke observes a heron aim his heavy bill above the wood: “The wide wings flap but once to lift him up. A sin­gle rip­ple starts from where he stood.”

Even Aldo Leopold does not forego lan­guage, and chron­i­cles the crane’s his­to­ry in deft words. Not only its local, present his­to­ry, but also the deep his­to­ry of the bird’s tribe, reach­ing back into remote geo­log­i­cal ages. When we hear the crane’s call, he says, we hear no mere bird: “We hear the trum­pet in the orches­tra of evo­lu­tion. He is the sym­bol of our untam­able past, of that incred­i­ble sweep of mil­len­nia which under­lies and con­di­tions the dai­ly affairs of birds and men.”

I sus­pect that Leopold is right, that our response to the ris­ing heron is at least part­ly con­di­tioned by our long entan­gle­ment with birds, a racial mem­o­ry of bright wings and dark shad­ows. We watch and we long for the gift of flight — expe­di­ent escape, unim­ped­ed travel.

Some­time back in the Juras­sic two evo­lu­tion­ary paths diverged — birds and mam­mals from ver­te­brate ances­tors. Our ear­li­est mam­malian par­ents took to the ground, dig­ging deep, dark bur­rows to escape rep­til­ian preda­tors. The birds sprang into the air on kites of feath­ers. We look today at those “ah! bright wings” and won­der at the road not taken.

In Chekhov’s The Three Sis­ters, sis­ter Masha refus­es “to live and not know why the cranes fly, why chil­dren are born, why the stars are in the sky. Either you know and you’re alive or its all non­sense, all dust in the wind.”

Why? Why? Instead of putting com­put­ers in our ele­men­tary school class­rooms we should take the chil­dren out into nature, away from those vir­tu­al worlds in which they spend uncon­scionable hours, and let them see a heron rise from the marsh, hear the gut­tur­al call, feel the light­ning thrust of the beak. Let them stand near a morn­ing marsh and shiv­er in the thrall of cold and beauty.

Then in the class­room let them inspect a repro­duc­tion of Audubon’s great blue heron, bluer than any heron you will see in a marsh, with its rapi­er beak and gold­en eye and water­fall of feath­ers. Let them exam­ine feath­ers and bird bones under a good dis­sect­ing micro­scope (cheap­er than a com­put­er). Show them a pho­to­graph of plumed Archaeopteryx, asleep in its bed of 150 mil­lion year-old lime­stone. Read them Cia­rdi’s poem Two Egrets—“like two white hands/ wash­ing one another/ in the prime of light” — and let them try their own hand at express­ing the inex­press­ible in words.

Either you know and you’re alive or it’s all non­sense, all dust in the wind,” says Masha. Let the chil­dren know. Let them know that noth­ing, noth­ing they will find in the vir­tu­al worlds of Game Boy or the Inter­net mat­ters half so much as the step into the air of a great blue heron, ris­ing into morn­ing mists on Gabriel wings, con­fer­ring on the marsh, the morn­ing, the watch­er, a dig­ni­ty, a blessed­ness that con­founds the dull hum­drum of the com­mon­place and opens a win­dow to infinity.

Share this Musing: