Feeling at home in the Milky Way

Feeling at home in the Milky Way

Photo by Greg Rakozy on Unsplash

Originally published 17 October 1983

On the night of an August mete­or show­er, my son and I slept under the open sky. It was a night of excep­tion­al clar­i­ty, far from the lights and haze of Boston. Mete­ors flashed against a back­ground of stars so numer­ous the heav­ens seemed more light than dark.

Above our heads the Milky Way arched from Cas­siopeia in the north to Sagit­tar­ius in the south. It was a dark-shoaled riv­er of light, a lumi­nous drap­ery, dia­mond dust on black vel­vet. As the hours passed and the stars tilt­ed toward the west, we could almost feel our­selves whirled in the spi­ral arms of the Galaxy.

Among the ancients, who viewed the heav­ens with clear­er skies, the Milky Way — the Via Galac­ti­ca — was a bridge, a road on a riv­er. The astronomer Robert Burn­ham has sug­gest­ed that these images are close­ly relat­ed to the idea of human life as a jour­ney or voy­age between two worlds, and to the end­less jour­ney of the Uni­verse itself toward an unknown des­ti­na­tion. It is a pow­er­ful, evoca­tive sym­bol­ism that goes a long way toward mak­ing us feel at home among the stars.

The mod­ern view of the Milky Way is no less evoca­tive. Our sun is one star in a disk-shaped swarm of sev­er­al hun­dred bil­lion stars. The stars in the disk are clus­tered in spi­ral arms that turn about the cen­ter like a pin­wheel. The sun shares that motion, mak­ing the cir­cu­lar jour­ney about the axis every 250 mil­lion years.

On the scale of the Galaxy, our Solar Sys­tem is a pin­prick, a mote of dust rid­ing a whirl­wind. All of the stars you see tonight, the thou­sands of stars you see on the best of nights, are but our near neigh­bors in one spi­ral­ing arm of the cir­cu­lar tide.

The eye of the hurricane

The bril­liance of the sum­mer Milky Way in the direc­tion of the con­stel­la­tion Sagit­tar­ius hints at the great den­si­ty of stars that clus­ter near the cen­ter of the spi­ral. Dust and gas in the cen­tral plane of the galac­tic disk obscures our view of the nucle­us, but radio and x‑ray tele­scopes have pen­e­trat­ed the obscur­ing mat­ter and revealed a pow­er­ful source of ener­gy. The nucle­us of the Milky Way Galaxy is appar­ent­ly a site for cos­mic vio­lence on the grand scale, per­haps a place where count­less suns are swal­lowed up by a mas­sive grav­i­ta­tion­al “black hole.”

Above and below the plane of the galac­tic disk, like bees around the hive, are sev­er­al hun­dred glob­u­lar clus­ters. These ball-shaped asso­ci­a­tions of thou­sands of stars are small satel­lites of the Milky Way.

But this is the “tra­di­tion­al” pic­ture of the Milky Way Galaxy. Recent stud­ies have added sur­pris­ing new features.

Radio stud­ies of the emis­sions of atom­ic hydro­gen show that the disk of the Galaxy is about twice as exten­sive as pre­vi­ous­ly thought. Clouds of hydro­gen extend well beyond the region of active star for­ma­tion, rim­ming the spi­ral with sub­urbs of gas, reach­ing with four great arms into the void of space.

Anoth­er unex­pect­ed exten­sion of the galaxy fol­lowed from the sim­ple busi­ness of count­ing stars. Stars are now count­ed on pho­to­graph­ic plates with com­put­er-con­trolled scan­ning light beams. These new tech­niques have enabled astronomers to cat­a­logue stars a hun­dred times fainter than in pre­vi­ous reli­able deter­mi­na­tions. They have dis­cov­ered stars of low intrin­sic bright­ness dis­trib­uted above and below the galac­tic disk, enclos­ing the bril­liant Milky Way spi­ral in a kind of egg-shaped aura of faint stars.

A more star­tling devel­op­ment has fol­lowed from stud­ies of the rota­tion­al dynam­ics of the Milky Way galaxy. Recent obser­va­tions of the motions of objects in the out­er reach­es of the galaxy — bright stars, clus­ters of stars in clouds of mol­e­c­u­lar gas, and glob­u­lar clus­ters — have enabled astronomers to refine their cal­cu­la­tions of the galac­tic mass. It seems that the Milky Way galaxy may be as much as ten times more mas­sive than thought. How could so much mat­ter have gone unde­tect­ed until now?

Dark, exotic matter

The answer is that the new­ly dis­cov­ered mass must con­sist of some exot­ic form of non-lumi­nous mat­ter. Not stars, which we should cer­tain­ly see ablaze in the heav­ens. Nor inter­stel­lar gas or dust, which we would observe by its own radi­a­tion of by the absorp­tion of light from dis­tant sources.

If the new­ly dis­cov­ered non-lumi­nous mat­ter of the Milky Way galaxy is typ­i­cal of oth­er galax­ies (and there is rea­son to believe that it is) we will have to dras­ti­cal­ly increase our esti­ma­tion of the mass of the Uni­verse. What is this hid­den com­po­nent of the Uni­verse, this dark mat­ter that con­sti­tutes the greater part of all that exists?

Per­haps the dark halo of the galaxy con­sists of Jupiter-sized objects, too small to have “turned on” as stars. Per­haps is con­sists of some yet unknown type of celes­tial body, larg­er than dust but small­er than the small­est stars. Or per­haps the dark mass con­sists of black holes, stars that have col­lapsed into them­selves and become do dense that light can­not escape the pull of their gravity.

The hid­den mat­ter of the Milky Way and oth­er galax­ies may decide the ulti­mate fate of the Uni­verse. Accord­ing to the the­o­ry of gen­er­al rel­a­tiv­i­ty, it is the aver­age mass den­si­ty of the Uni­verse that will deter­mine whether the Uni­verse expands for­ev­er in the cold void, or falls back upon itself to recre­ate the blaz­ing fire­ball of its creation.

All of this we knew and felt that August night, as we watched the annu­al dis­play of “shoot­ing stars,” adrift on our backs in the stream of the Milky Way. We rode a spin­ning Earth about a sun that spun in a whirlpool of a tril­lion stars, sealed in an enve­lope of mys­te­ri­ous dark mat­ter, wheels with­in wheels with­in wheels, shar­ing the jour­ney of the Uni­verse toward an uncer­tain des­ti­na­tion. It was a ride that left us reeling.


The exis­tence of so-called “dark mat­ter” has been gen­er­al­ly accept­ed by astro­physi­cists in the decades since this essay was first writ­ten. As a result, there is con­sen­sus among cos­mol­o­gists that the Uni­verse will expand for­ev­er, becom­ing more and more dif­fuse. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: