DNA magic may reveal some of the Iceman’s secrets

DNA magic may reveal some of the Iceman’s secrets

Reconstruction of the Iceman as it was discovered • Photo by Thilo Parg (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Originally published 21 October 1991

Mys­tery sur­rounds the well-pre­served 4,000-year-old body of a man found recent­ly in an Alpine glac­i­er. Who was he? Why had he climbed so high above the val­ley floor? How did he die?

He was armed with axe, knife, bow, and quiver of arrows. He car­ried a flint and tin­der in a leather pouch. He wore some nifty leather duds and a wood­en back­pack. All he lacked was a Swiss Army knife.

Archae­ol­o­gists guess that the Ice­man (as he was dubbed) came from the upper class­es of his soci­ety. He was indeed hand­some­ly fit­ted out, sug­gest­ing a cer­tain sta­tus in his com­mu­ni­ty. The man’s body was clean-shaven, includ­ing eye­brows and pubic hair, and he bore tat­toos on his back and feet. These too were signs of high rank in ancient cul­tures, say archaeologists.

This is all infer­ence, of course, inspired less by incon­tro­vert­ible evi­dence than by the desire to find a prince rather than a pau­per. Who wants John Doe on ice when you can have a Bronze Age celebri­ty instead?

There are alter­na­tive inter­pre­ta­tions of the evi­dence. Per­haps the Ice­man was a thief, mak­ing his get­away across the moun­tain with a load of stolen goods. The point is, no one real­ly knows, and the Ice­man isn’t talking.

The Iceman’s DNA

How­ev­er, there may be some things we can know for sure about the Ice­man. Genet­ic researchers will be quick to stick their nee­dles into his skin, col­lect­ing spec­i­mens of DNA for analy­sis. A new tech­nique called PCR (poly­merase chain reac­tion) will enable them to clone the Ice­man’s DNA over and over again until they have a sub­stan­tial quan­ti­ty of acces­si­ble, iden­ti­fi­able mate­r­i­al. Then they can read the genet­ic code and piece togeth­er the Ice­man’s place in the dra­ma of life.

A sin­gle hair stub­ble from a pore in the Ice­man’s clean-shaven chin, for exam­ple, could pro­vide enough DNA, when ampli­fied by PCR, to deter­mine the unlucky Bronze Age climber’s kin­ship to present-day Europeans.

The PCR method for cloning genes was dis­cov­ered in 1985 by a Cal­i­for­nia sci­en­tist named Kary Mullis. With the new tech­nol­o­gy, DNA can be made to repro­duce itself over and over, mul­ti­ply­ing a mil­lion­fold. Dur­ing the past few years espe­cial­ly, researchers have become amaz­ing­ly adept at cloning and iden­ti­fy­ing tiny snip­pets of DNA.

The new tech­nol­o­gy has obvi­ous appli­ca­tion to genet­ic engi­neer­ing, med­i­cine, and foren­sics (absolute­ly iden­ti­fy­ing the per­pe­tra­tor of a crime from the evi­dence of a micro­scop­ic flake if skin, for exam­ple). It also pro­vides archae­ol­o­gists, anthro­pol­o­gists, and evo­lu­tion­ists with a pow­er­ful tool for recon­struct­ing the past.

What aston­ish­es all researchers is the length of time ancient DNA can remain intact and clonable.

Long sec­tions of human DNA have been cloned from a 2,400-year-old Egypt­ian mum­my, and from the brain cells of humans buried 8,000 years ago in a Flori­da bog.

Sci­en­tists are using DNA from ancient buri­als to deter­mine kin­ships among the pre-Columbian peo­ples of the Amer­i­c­as, and to dis­cov­er the mys­te­ri­ous ori­gin of Britain’s Anglo-Saxons.

Wool­ly mam­moths became extinct 10,000 years ago, but enough DNA has been recov­ered and cloned from a mam­moth found frozen in Siberia to show that it is relat­ed with equal affin­i­ty to present-day African and Indi­an elephants.

So far, the ancient DNA sweep­stakes is led by Edward Golen­berg, a geneti­cist at Wayne State Uni­ver­si­ty, who extract­ed DNA from 18-mil­lion-year-old fos­sil mag­no­lia leaves that came from the bed of an ancient lake in Ida­ho. The DNA was cloned into ana­lyz­able quan­ti­ties and com­pared gene by gene with mod­ern trees. Golen­berg is now look­ing at 100-mil­lion-year-old plant fos­sils from the age of dinosaurs.

Building plans for life

What we have here is the genet­ic recon­struc­tion of the past, fig­ur­ing out life’s fam­i­ly tree not by the tra­di­tion­al meth­ods of evo­lu­tion­ists — based on anatom­i­cal sim­i­lar­i­ties among liv­ing species and the study of fos­sils — but by using the very blue­prints of life itself. It’s as if among the ruined cities of past civ­i­liza­tions archae­ol­o­gists found com­plete sets of build­ing plans, still fresh and intact.

Appli­ca­tions of PCR tech­nol­o­gy will mul­ti­ply dra­mat­i­cal­ly in the next few years. In the long haul, it could turn out to be the most impor­tant new tech­nol­o­gy of the 20th cen­tu­ry, edg­ing out such devel­op­ments as nuclear ener­gy and the transistor.

Mean­while, the Ice­man may yield some of his secrets, not by the spiffy gear he car­ried into the Alpine pass (which may, after all, have been pur­loined), nor by his tat­toos or pecu­liar shav­ing habits (which may have been com­mon to every John Doe in the tribe). In every cell of his body he car­ries a com­plete and unam­bigu­ous call­ing card, iden­ti­fy­ing his unique place in the ever-unfold­ing pageant of life.

PCR tech­nol­o­gy can ampli­fy genet­ic whis­pers from the past into a full-voiced cho­rus of his­to­ry. As more of the Ice­man’s near con­tem­po­raries are thawed from ice, recov­ered from bogs, or scratched out of the ground bone by bone, we are sure to know more about where he came from — and where we all are going.


Ötzi the Ice­man’s com­plete genome was sequenced by 2012, yield­ing a wealth of genet­ic infor­ma­tion. In 2013, DNA analy­sis has dis­cov­ered 19 liv­ing Aus­tri­ans who are genet­i­cal­ly relat­ed to the 5,000-year-old Ice­man. ‑Ed.

Share this Musing: