Detective work in the heavens

Detective work in the heavens

17th century star atlas (Public Domain)

Originally published 25 February 1985

Who invent­ed the con­stel­la­tions? Who first imag­ined the con­fronta­tion of Tau­rus and Ori­on in the win­ter sky? Who placed the fig­ures of the Great Bear and the Lit­tle Bear near the north­ern pole? Who sent Cygnus the Swan wing­ing along the stream of the Milky Way?

Most of the con­stel­la­tions that are famil­iar to north­ern observers are very ancient. The mys­tery of their ori­gin has long intrigued arche­ol­o­gists and pre­his­to­ri­ans. In a recent issue of Vis­tas in Astron­o­my, Archie Roy of the Uni­ver­si­ty of Glas­gow recon­structs the mys­tery, and offers a new the­o­ry for how, when, and where the con­stel­la­tions came into being.

A debt to the Greeks

This much is cer­tain: The famil­iar con­stel­la­tion and their atten­dant myths — as we know them — are essen­tial­ly Greek. Pla­to’s stu­dent Eudoxus described our sys­tem of con­stel­la­tions some­time between 400 and 350 B.C. He left to his suc­ces­sors a star globe know as the Sphere of Eudoxus. The works of Eudoxus have been lost, includ­ing the sphere, but we know of his ideas through an account of Ara­tus, who wrote about 220 B.C. In Ara­tus we find descrip­tions of Ori­on, Sagit­tar­ius, Scor­pio, Gem­i­ni, and dozens of oth­er con­stel­la­tions that still grace our star maps, along with their posi­tions in the sky.

Did Eudoxus, then, invent our sys­tem of con­stel­la­tions? Or did he inher­it the sys­tem from a still more ancient source — the Baby­lo­ni­ans, per­haps, or the Phoeni­cians, or the Egyp­tians? The answer these ques­tions, we must become astro­nom­i­cal detectives.

The Earth is sur­round­ed on every side by stars. Ancient peo­ples imag­ined that the stars resided on an all-enclos­ing celes­tial sphere, a sky sphere that was con­cen­tric with the Earth.

Not all of the stars on the “sky sphere” are vis­i­ble from a par­tic­u­lar place on Earth. For exam­ple, as the Earth turns under the sky (or, as the ancients would have said, as the sky turns over the Earth), an observ­er in Boston has a chance to see about two-thirds of all the stars in the sky. Stars close to the sky’s south­ern pole nev­er rise above the hori­zon of Boston. To see those stars a Boston­ian would need to trav­el south.

The con­stel­la­tions described by Ara­tus do not include a region of stars near the sky’s south­ern pole, just as we might expect if the con­stel­la­tions were invent­ed in the north­ern hemi­sphere. The size of the blank region on the Sphere of Eudoxus (as described by Ara­tus) cor­re­sponds to that part of the sky that could not be seen by an observ­er who lived about 36 degrees north of the equa­tor. That is close to the lat­i­tude of Greece. The evi­dence points to Eudoxus.

But wait! The cen­ter of the region of unchart­ed stars does not cor­re­spond to the south­ern pole at the time of Eudoxus. Ara­tus describes stars that Eudoxus could not have seen, and leaves out stars that Eudoxus could have seen if only he had looked.

The rea­son is not hard to find. As the Earth spins, its axis wob­bles like a top. Because of the wob­ble, the north­ern and south­ern poles of the sky con­tin­u­ous­ly change, although very slow­ly. The stars that are not includ­ed in the con­stel­la­tions of Eudoxus are cen­tered on the place in the sky that was the south­ern pole in 2000 B.C. Eudoxus must have inher­it­ed the con­stel­la­tions: he did not invent them.

Accord­ing to Roy, the orig­i­na­tors of our sys­tem of con­stel­la­tions must have lived around 2000 B.C. at a lat­i­tude of about 36 degrees north of the equator.

We can rule out the Egyp­tians because they lived too far south. We can rule out the Phoeni­cians because they pros­pered too late. What about the Baby­lo­ni­ans? They were pas­sion­ate observers of the sky. The lat­i­tude is right, the time is right. The Baby­lo­ni­ans have long been sus­pect­ed of being the prin­ci­pal source of Greek astronomy.

But let’s ask why the con­stel­la­tions were invent­ed. Roy argues they were intend­ed pri­mar­i­ly as aids for nav­i­ga­tion at sea. He bases this asser­tion on the fact that the pat­terns of con­stel­la­tions were ori­en­tat­ed with respect to the poles and equa­tor of the sky, rather than with the stars (the Zodi­ac) that mark the change of the sea­sons. This sug­gests, says Roy, that the con­stel­la­tions were sys­tem­atized by a sea­far­ing peo­ple, rather than an agri­cul­tur­al civ­i­liza­tion. Although pri­mar­i­ly agri­cul­tur­al, the Baby­lo­ni­ans did trade by sea: but their voy­ages took them into the Indi­an Ocean and far enough south to have seen stars that are not described by Aratus.

Instrument of navigation

If not the Baby­lo­ni­ans, then who? What we require is a sea­far­ing nation near lat­i­tude 36 degrees that pros­pered around 2000 B.C. The answer, says Roy, is the Minoan civ­i­liza­tion of the island of Crete. It was the Minoans, he sug­gests, who took Baby­lon­ian sky lore and turned it into a pre­cise instru­ment of navigation.

But why was the Minoan sky map so far out of date when it was adopt­ed by Eudoxus? Geol­o­gists have the answer. About 1450 B.C., a colos­sal vol­canic erup­tion blew apart the island of Thera, a Minoan out­post 75 miles north of Crete. The erup­tion was one of the most vio­lent in the known his­to­ry of the Earth. The quakes, the ash falls, and the tidal waves dev­as­tat­ed Crete, and dealt Minoan civ­i­liza­tion a blow from which it nev­er recovered.

Per­haps Minoan sailors were strand­ed in Egypt at the time of the erup­tion. Per­haps a Minoan nav­i­ga­tion­al star globe made its way into the archives of Egypt­ian priests, where it was dis­cov­ered by Eudoxus when he vis­it­ed Egypt 1000 years later.

If Roy is right, Ori­on, Tau­rus, Sagit­tar­ius, and the oth­er famil­iar con­stel­la­tions were invent­ed on the island of Crete by Minoan sea­far­ers, and frozen for­ev­er in time by a geo­log­i­cal caprice of the Earth.

Share this Musing: