Cycle of destruction

Cycle of destruction

Artist's conception of comet bombardment • NASA/JPL-Caltech

Originally published 22 April 1985

Gersh­win said it: I got rhythm. Let’s add to that: All God’s crea­tures got rhythm. Every bird in the air and fish in the sea got rhythm. There are dai­ly rhythms: Roost­ers grow at sun­rise and bats fly at dusk. There are annu­al rhythms: Ferns unfurl their fronds in the spring and trees go gaudy with col­or in the fall. And there are month­ly rhythms: The moon rais­es tides in the sea and inspires peri­od­ic luna­cy and romance.

Recent­ly, sci­en­tists have begun to sus­pect that there may be even longer-term rhythms in the his­to­ry of the Earth. In ear­ly 1984, biol­o­gists D. M. Raup and J. J. Sep­kos­ki point­ed out what appears to be a 26-mil­lion-year rhythm in the extinc­tions of marine organ­isms, as revealed in the fos­sil record. Their work inspired spec­u­la­tion about the cause of such a cycle.

In a recent issue of Sci­ence, Michael Rampino and Richard Stothers of the NASA God­dard Insti­tute for Space Stud­ies take this con­tro­ver­sial issue a step fur­ther. They present cor­rob­o­rat­ing evi­dence for the 26-mil­lion-year cycle, which they assert is actu­al­ly a 33-mil­lion-year cycle. And they pro­pose anoth­er rhythm in Earth his­to­ry, a geo­log­i­cal cycle with a peri­od of 260 mil­lion years.

Search for cycles

Rampino and Stothers searched the geo­log­i­cal record of the past for evi­dence of cycles. They used fos­sil data for extinc­tions of marine organ­isms. They looked for episodes of intense geo­log­i­cal activ­i­ty: moun­tain build­ing, sea-floor spread­ing, and the intru­sion of deep man­tle mate­ri­als into con­ti­nen­tal rocks. They con­sid­ered vari­a­tions of sea lev­el. And they con­sid­ered the fre­quen­cies at which the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field has reversed polar­i­ty, as record­ed in the fos­sil mag­net­ism of rocks. Out of these diverse data, two rhythms con­sis­tent­ly emerged: one was a sharply defined cycle of 33 mil­lion years; the oth­er, a broad­er cycle with a peri­od of about 260 mil­lion years.

But what could punc­tu­ate the Earth­’s his­to­ry on such a glob­al scale, affect­ing, appar­ent­ly, geo­log­i­cal activ­i­ty, cli­mate, and life? The answer, accord­ing to Rampino and Stothers, is the peri­od­ic bom­bard­ment of the Earth by comets. The bom­bard­ments impart enough ener­gy to the plan­et to trig­ger geo­log­i­cal and cli­mat­ic disturbances.

To sup­port their the­o­ry, Rampino and Stothers col­lect­ed data on the ages of impact craters on the Earth­’s sur­face. The cra­ter­ing appears to be episod­ic, they claim, with a cycle time of approx­i­mate­ly 33 mil­lion years.

And what could cause the Earth to be rhyth­mi­cal­ly show­ered with rock from the sky, enough rock to blast craters and dra­mat­i­cal­ly alter Earth his­to­ry? The answer, say Rampino and Stothers, lies in the way the Solar Sys­tem moves through the Milky Way galaxy.

A galactic orbit

With bil­lions of oth­er stars, the Sun orbits the nucle­us of the galaxy. As it orbits, it moves up and down with a wave­like motion, pass­ing through the flat cen­tral plane of the galaxy every 33 mil­lion years. Inter­stel­lar clouds of dust and gas tend to be con­cen­trat­ed in the cen­tral plane of the galaxy: thus, every 33 mil­lion years, the Solar Sys­tem is more like­ly to encounter a major cloud of dust and gas. The grav­i­ta­tion­al effect of such a cloud might dis­turb the halo of comets that sur­rounds the Solar Sys­tem, send­ing many of the comets stream­ing inward toward the Sun, and a few to inevitable col­li­sion with the Earth…with dire con­se­quences for life.

Rampino and Stothers are less will­ing to spec­u­late about the cause of the 260-mil­lion-year geo­log­i­cal cycle (if such a cycle exists), but they are inclined to believe that the cycle is relat­ed to the so-called galac­tic year, the time it takes the Solar Sys­tem to orbit the cen­ter of the Milky Way galaxy.

This whole mat­ter of rhythms in Earth his­to­ry is high­ly con­tro­ver­sial, and relies on the sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis of lim­it­ed amounts of uncer­tain and “noisy” data. Many astronomers and geol­o­gists take vig­or­ous issue with the con­clu­sions of Rampino and Stothers. But there is a strong ten­den­cy in sci­ence toward cat­a­stroph­ic expla­na­tions for nat­ur­al events.

This ten­den­cy toward cat­a­stroph­ic expla­na­tions in sci­ence is one of the most sig­nif­i­cant philo­soph­i­cal devel­op­ments of our time. In the new sci­ence, con­ti­nents col­lide, stars explode, and species emerge vir­tu­al­ly overnight. And (maybe) the Solar Sys­tem weaves its way up and down through the cen­tral plane of the galaxy, rhyth­mi­cal­ly encoun­ter­ing clouds of mate­r­i­al that wreak hav­oc on Earth.

Even now, the Solar Sys­tem is pass­ing through the galaxy’s cen­tral plane, although tem­porar­i­ly in a pock­et of rel­a­tive­ly clear space. If Rampino, Stothers, and their fel­low cat­a­strophists are right, we are present­ly in a qui­et inter­lude of what should be a time of cat­a­stro­phe. With­in a few mil­lion years the Earth may be in for anoth­er episode of violence.

Share this Musing: