Consider the drift

Consider the drift

The eggshell Earth • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Public Domain)

Originally published 4 November 1985

Humans have an appetite for the fab­u­lous. Once that appetite was sat­is­fied by uni­corns, hip­pogriffs, mer­maids, or mon­sters. Today, more often than not, it is sat­is­fied by UFOs, abom­inable snow­men, and oth­er pseu­do-sci­en­tif­ic phenomena.

It has always aston­ished me that peo­ple are inter­est­ed in such things as “ESP” and “ancient astro­nauts” when the real won­ders of the world lie all around us, won­ders more fab­u­lous than any­thing the pseu­do-sci­en­tists can dream. What Loch Ness mon­ster is more mys­te­ri­ous than the gar­gan­tu­an black hole that astronomers have detect­ed at the cen­ter of the Milky Way Galaxy? What astro­log­i­cal influ­ence of the stars is more mag­i­cal than the daz­zling dance of the DNA as goes about its busi­ness of mak­ing us what we are?

It is not the degree of “fab­u­lous­ness” that dis­tin­guish­es pseu­do-sci­ence from sci­ence. I think it was the sci­en­tist Michael Fara­day who said, “Noth­ing is too won­der­ful to be true.” What makes the fab­u­lous cre­ations of sci­ence “sci­ence” is that they can be test­ed against expe­ri­ence in a com­mu­nal, repro­ducible way.

Con­sid­er con­ti­nen­tal drift.

In the last two decades, geol­o­gists have become con­vinced that the con­ti­nents move about on the face of the Earth, some­times col­lid­ing and rais­ing moun­tains, some­times rift­ing apart to make new ocean basins. The drift of con­ti­nents is part of a new the­o­ry known as plate tec­ton­ics. Accord­ing to the the­o­ry, the Earth­’s rigid rocky crust is eggshell-thin. Under the crust, the body of the Earth is hot, plas­tic, and in motion. Tur­bu­lent forces in the Earth­’s inte­ri­or break the crust into sheets of “eggshell” called plates, and drag them about. Every few hun­dred mil­lion years the sur­face of the Earth is rearranged or remade.

Before the Atlantic existed

What state­ments about the world could be more fab­u­lous than these? Two hun­dred mil­lion years ago North Amer­i­ca and North Africa were on the Earth­’s equa­tor. They were part of one large “super­con­ti­nent” that embraced most of the Earth­’s land mass­es. The Atlantic Ocean did not exist. You could have walked from New Eng­land to Moroc­co with­out get­ting your feet wet.

Geol­o­gists believe these things because they are part of a the­o­ry that explains in an eco­nom­i­cal way many fea­tures of the Earth­’s crust. But the assumed drift of con­ti­nents is only an inch or so a year, too slow to be observed directly.

Until now. Two dif­fer­ent tech­niques promise to enable geol­o­gists to con­firm the drift of con­ti­nents, by actu­al­ly mea­sur­ing the dis­tance between con­ti­nents with an accu­ra­cy of a few mil­lime­ters. One method, know as Satel­lite Laser Rang­ing (SLR), involves bounc­ing a laser beam off a satel­lite equipped with a reflec­tor. The exact time required for the laser beam to com­plete a round trip makes it pos­si­ble to pin­point a site’s loca­tion with extreme accuracy.

An even more promis­ing method has been bor­rowed by geol­o­gists from the astronomers, and is known as Very Long Base­line Inter­fer­om­e­try (VLBI). In the VLBI exper­i­ments, two wide­ly sep­a­rat­ed dish anten­nas record radio sig­nals from the same dis­tant source, typ­i­cal­ly a galaxy bil­lions of lights years away. The slight dif­fer­ences in the arrival times of the sig­nals are record­ed with atom­ic clocks. 

Differences are minute

The time dif­fer­ences, which are due to the finite veloc­i­ty of the radio waves and the tiny dif­fer­ences of dis­tance from the source, are as small as a few thou­sandths of a sec­ond. If these dif­fer­ences are mea­sured for at least three sources, it is pos­si­ble to pre­cise­ly cal­cu­late the dis­tance between the two receivers.

VLBI obser­va­tions made over the past four years at obser­va­to­ries in Mass­a­chu­setts and Swe­den appear to show that North Amer­i­ca and Europe are indeed sep­a­rat­ing by about an inch a year.

Uncer­tain­ties in the analy­sis of the data remain dis­tress­ing­ly large. But, says Dou­glas Robert­son of the Nation­al Geo­det­ic Sur­vey, if the mea­sured motion “isn’t sig­nif­i­cant now, it is very close. We are rapid­ly approach­ing the point where we will have a great deal of con­fi­dence in the results.”

With­in the next few years, SLR and VLBI exper­i­ments are expect­ed to con­firm the drift of con­ti­nents on a glob­al scale. Already researchers have ten­ta­tive­ly claimed to have observed the nar­row­ing of the Pacif­ic Ocean, the slip of South­ern Cal­i­for­nia north­ward along the San Andreas Fault, and the slow con­trac­tion of North Amer­i­ca between the Appalachi­ans and the Rock­ies, in addi­tion to the widen­ing of the Atlantic.

So. The con­ti­nents drift. Oceans widen or shrink. Boston recedes from Casablan­ca at the rate of an inch per year. In 10 mil­lion years Los Ange­les and San Fran­cis­co will be side by side. Fab­u­lous. And true.

Share this Musing: