Coming to America — the first time

Coming to America — the first time

A remaining section of the Bering Land Bridge • Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 27 January 1997

Raven was walk­ing on the beach. He was lone­ly. He had the sun, the moon, the land and the sea, but he desired the com­pa­ny of oth­er crea­tures. Sud­den­ly, a clam shell pushed up through the sand. It opened. Out came tiny peo­ple, men, women and chil­dren, brush­ing sand from their naked bod­ies. The peo­ple moved about, and took up res­i­dence in Raven’s land. Raven was hap­py. His wish had brought the first peo­ple into the world.

This cre­ation sto­ry of Native Amer­i­cans of the North­west Coast has charm, but it leaves some­thing to be desired as sci­ence. But the real sto­ry of where the first Amer­i­cans came from has a charm of its own. It also has courage, grand geo­graph­ic sweep, and epic adventure.

Although some Native Amer­i­cans may resent that the new sto­ry of their ances­tors has most­ly been told by white men and women, it at least has the advan­tage of mak­ing us all — natives and colonists — mem­bers of the same human family.

The new sto­ry has been derived from three kinds of evi­dence: arche­ol­o­gy, lan­guage, and DNA. Much of the evi­dence is con­tro­ver­sial, some­times so con­tro­ver­sial that it makes one long for the sim­ple sureties of Raven and the clam.

The ear­li­est uncon­test­ed arche­o­log­i­cal evi­dence of Native Amer­i­can ori­gins con­sists most­ly of frag­ments of stone and bone — scrap­ings and cut­ting tools and spear points — col­lect­ed at sites from Cal­i­for­nia to Nova Sco­tia, from Alas­ka to Mex­i­co. The peo­ple who made these arti­facts are called the Clo­vis peo­ple, after a site in New Mex­i­co where spear points are asso­ci­at­ed with the bones of slaugh­tered mam­moths. Appar­ent­ly, the Clo­vis peo­ple inhab­it­ed most of North Amer­i­ca by about 11,000 years ago.

They seem to have been the first inhab­i­tants; there is no evi­dence that Nean­derthals or oth­er pre­hu­man ances­tors ever lived in the West­ern Hemi­sphere. All evi­dence sug­gests that the ances­tors of the Clo­vis peo­ple came from the Old World via Asia about 12,000 years ago. How they got here is a thrilling sto­ry that deserves to be told again and again.

It begins as the last Ice Age was draw­ing to a close. Huge sheets of ice cov­ered much of what is now Cana­da and the north­ern Unit­ed States. So much water was frozen upon the con­ti­nents that the oceans were hun­dreds of feet low­er. Siberia and Alas­ka were con­nect­ed by a dry land bridge at what is now the Bering Strait. Parts of Alas­ka, how­ev­er, were unglaciat­ed, and Asian nomads moved across the bridge into these tun­dra wastes, pre­sum­ably pur­su­ing game.

Once in Alas­ka they were pre­vent­ed from mov­ing far­ther south by a thick wall of ice reach­ing from coast to coast. In places the glac­i­er was two miles thick, an impen­e­tra­ble bar­ri­er to fur­ther migration.

Then the cli­mate began to warm. The ice began to melt and the seas rose, flood­ing the Bering Strait and cut­ting off retreat to Asia for the first Amer­i­cans. But now a nar­row cor­ri­dor opened up to the south as the ice thinned, between the moun­tain glac­i­ers to the west and a vast con­ti­nen­tal glac­i­er that was cen­tered on east­ern Cana­da. Pur­su­ing ani­mals, the immi­grants moved south along this corridor.

Ice to the left, ice to the right: mile-high sheets of ice reach­ing west­ward to the Pacif­ic and east­ward to the Atlantic. The cor­ri­dor was bit­ter cold, with sparse tun­dra veg­e­ta­tion. Icy winds lashed the mar­gins of the glac­i­ers. For more than a thou­sand miles, the intre­pid jour­ney­ers made their way, wrapped in skins as they trudged by day, hud­dled in make-shift camps at night, their one win­ning card the beau­ti­ful­ly-craft­ed flut­ed points with which they tipped their spears.

When they reached the south­ern end of the cor­ri­dor, about where Mon­tana is today, their bleak pas­sage opened onto a lush par­adise with game aplen­ty — 20-foot-long ground sloths, beavers the size of mod­ern bears, hors­es, camels, musk-oxen, mastodons and mam­moths, saber-toothed cats with eight-inch fangs, chee­tahs and lions, wolves, and bears twice the size of griz­zlies — of which the new Amer­i­cans were the first exploiters.

With­in a thou­sand years their descen­dants — the Clo­vis peo­ple — had col­o­nized the con­ti­nent. A thou­sand years lat­er they had reached the south­ern tip of South America.

By then, many of the larg­er native ani­mals had become extinct. The warm­ing cli­mate may be impli­cat­ed in the extinc­tions, but unre­strained hunt­ing by the new­com­ers may have played a role too.

Did all present-day native Amer­i­cans descend from these orig­i­nal migrants, or have there been suc­ces­sive waves of immi­gra­tion from Asia? The answer to this ques­tion is hot­ly debat­ed by lin­guists and genet­ic researchers.

A decade ago, Stan­ford Uni­ver­si­ty lin­guist Joseph Green­berg pro­posed that native Amer­i­can lan­guages could be divid­ed into three unre­lat­ed groups, sug­gest­ing three sep­a­rate migra­tions. Now, researchers com­par­ing the DNA of many tribes of native Amer­i­cans, from Alas­ka to Argenti­na, have found cer­tain genet­ic mark­ers that are shared by all, sug­gest­ing a sin­gle migration.

Clear­ly, the com­plete sto­ry of the set­tling of Amer­i­ca has not yet been told. Arche­ol­o­gists, lin­guists, and genet­ic researchers will bat­tle it out until their sep­a­rate lines of inquiry con­verge on a sto­ry that is accept­able to all. What­ev­er the out­come, these debates will not lessen the dra­ma of that first con­ti­nent-col­o­niz­ing trek through an ice-walled cor­ri­dor by small bands of coura­geous Asian hunters. They were the true “dis­cov­er­ers of America.”

Share this Musing: