Can a skeptic pray?

Can a skeptic pray?

Photo by Mark de Jong on Unsplash

Originally published 6 February 2005

When two pagan Irish princess­es, daugh­ters of King Lóe­gaire, asked Patrick about his God, he is said to have answered: “Our God is the God of all things, the God of the sky and earth, the God of sea and stream, the God of sun and moon, the God of the great high moun­tains and the deep glens, the God of heav­en, in heav­en and under heav­en. And he has a house­hold — heav­en and earth and the sea and all they contain.”

From what we know of the druidic faith of the Celts, none of this would have sound­ed par­tic­u­lar­ly for­eign to the pagan princess­es. Patrick­’s words evoke noth­ing so much as the poem of Amer­gin, a pri­ma­ry doc­u­ment of pre-Chris­t­ian Irish lit­er­a­ture passed down for cen­turies through the oral tradition.

I am the wind on the sea. 
I am the ocean wave. 
I am the sound of the billows. 
I am the seven-horned stag. 
I am the hawk on the cliff. 
I am the dewdrop in sunlight. 
I am the fairest of flowers. 
I am the raging boar. 
I am the salmon in the deep pool. 
I am the lake on the plain. 
I am the meaning of the poem. 
I am the point of the spear. 
I am the god that makes fire in the head. 
Who levels the mountain? 
Who speaks the age of the moon? 
Who has been where the sun sleeps? 
Who, if not I?

Writ­ing about Celtic spir­i­tu­al­i­ty, Noel Der­mot O’Donoghue speaks of the Irish per­cep­tion of a Pres­ence in the world, exist­ing some­where between light and dark­ness, clar­i­ty and mys­tery, mat­ter and spir­it. The God of the ear­li­est Irish Chris­tians was the King of the Ele­ments, Rìgh na nDúl, he says, and adds: “Just as Chris­tian­i­ty became wed­ded to logos in Hel­lenism, and to author­i­ty in Roman­ism, it became wed­ded to nature and the nat­ur­al world, in all its var­i­ous lev­els and regions, in the Celtic world.”

What does it mean to hon­or a God whose imma­nence takes prece­dence over his tran­scen­dence? How do we wor­ship a God who ani­mates all things but reveals noth­ing direct­ly of him­self? And, most impor­tant­ly from a mod­ern skep­tic’s point of view, how do we pray to a deity who eludes even the per­son pro­nouns “he,” “him­self,” and “who,” who absconds from the tem­ples of our imag­i­na­tion and hides in the inter­stices of cre­ation? If the mys­tery and majesty of nature cre­ates “a fire in the head,” as it must inevitably for any­one who thinks deeply about the world, to whom or to what do we address our response? Is any sort of prayer com­pat­i­ble with the sci­en­tif­ic sto­ry of creation?

There is a tra­di­tion of Chris­t­ian prayer that is open to mys­tery and yet attuned to God’s imma­nence. The Trap­pist con­tem­pla­tive Thomas Mer­ton describes it this way: “When I am lib­er­at­ed by silence, when I am no longer involved in the mea­sure­ment of life, but in the liv­ing of it, I can dis­cov­er a form of prayer in which there is effec­tive­ly no dis­trac­tion. My whole life becomes a prayer. My whole silence is full of prayer…Let me seek, then, the gift of silence, and pover­ty, and soli­tude, where every­thing I touch is turned into prayer: where the sky is my prayer, the birds are my prayer, the wind in the trees is my prayer, for God is all in all.” He might have added: The whirling galax­ies are my prayer. The cease­less­ly weav­ing DNA is my prayer. The fold­ing of the moun­tains and the grind­ing glac­i­ers are my prayer. The more ful­ly we grasp the real­ness of the world, the more ful­ly are these things the objects of our con­tem­pla­tion, thanks­giv­ing, praise.

In her won­der­ful book, A Nat­ur­al His­to­ry of the Sens­es, Diane Ack­er­man speaks of per­cep­tion — the men­tal reg­is­tra­tion of sense impres­sions — as a form of grace. In Roman Catholic the­ol­o­gy one must be dis­posed to grace to receive it, which means (in Ack­er­man’s metaphor) liv­ing with the five win­dows of the sens­es thrown open to the world, uncur­tained, in all weath­ers. She writes, “Life show­ers over every­thing, radi­ant, gushing.”

The ear­li­est Irish Chris­t­ian monks, the imme­di­ate suc­ces­sors of Patrick, took them­selves to the wildest, most remote islands and penin­su­las of the Atlantic shore, to places where the rush and gush of nature was unceas­ing. The winds of the sea played over their heart­strings like Aeo­lian harps. We know from the texts that have come down to us from their time that what the monks sought was con­tained in the pre-Chris­t­ian Celtic con­cept of neart—a strength, pow­er, or force that resides in and ani­mates the world.

Share this Musing: