Beauty bare on the spiral staircase

Beauty bare on the spiral staircase

Model of a DNA molecule • Photo by CGP Grey (CC BY 2.0)

Originally published 5 January 1998

Tucked away among the exhibits of Boston’s Muse­um of Sci­ence is a ten-foot-high mod­el of a seg­ment of DNA. The atoms are rep­re­sent­ed by col­ored balls — car­bon black, oxy­gen red, nitro­gen blue, hydro­gen white — linked by rods. It is a Tin­ker Toy con­struc­tion with­out compare.

To my mind, the mod­el is the most extra­or­di­nary exhib­it in the muse­um. When­ev­er I vis­it, I stand in front of this par­tial strand of DNA, gape-jawed at the beau­ty, at the sim­plic­i­ty — out of which emerges the aston­ish­ing diver­si­ty and awe­some com­plex­i­ty of life.

This is the famous dou­ble helix, a mol­e­cule shaped like a spi­ral stair­case. The side rails of the stair­case are linked sug­ar and phos­phate mol­e­cules. The steps are paired organ­ic bases: ade­nine, thymine, gua­nine, and cyto­sine, usu­al­ly labeled A, T, G, and C. The bases appear in four com­bi­na­tions — A‑T, T‑A, C‑G, or G‑C — no more, no less.

The sto­ry of life is writ­ten in a lan­guage of just 4 letters!

The muse­um’s DNA mod­el con­tains only a few dozen base pairs, a tiny frac­tion of what is con­tained with­in the DNA of even the sim­plest liv­ing organ­ism. If the whole of a human’s DNA were shown at the scale of the mod­el, it would­n’t fit with­in the entire museum.

Nev­er­the­less, what I feel as I stand before the par­tial mod­el can­not be ade­quate­ly put into words. Call it rev­er­ence, awe, praise. “Euclid alone has looked on Beau­ty bare,” wrote the poet Edna St. Vin­cent Mil­lay. Here, in this exquis­ite geo­met­ri­cal mol­e­cule, we look on Beau­ty bare.

I felt the same response recent­ly when I looked at a schemat­ic map of the com­plete genome (genet­ic mate­r­i­al) of the bac­teri­um Bacil­lus sub­tilis in the jour­nal Nature.

This organ­ism is about as sim­ple as you can get and still be alive — a sin­gle chro­mo­some in a micro­scop­ic blob of pro­to­plasm. But it moves, it feeds, it metab­o­lizes nutri­ents from the envi­ron­ment, it repro­duces by pro­duc­ing a spore; in short, it does pret­ty much the same things we spend much of our time doing, although with con­sid­er­ably less intro­spec­tion and anxiety.

Bacil­lus sub­tilis is one of a half-dozen or so organ­isms whose DNA has been com­plete­ly sequenced; that is, the entire sequence of base pairs has been deter­mined, along with their genet­ic functions.

This infor­ma­tion is rep­re­sent­ed in the Nature arti­cle as an 8‑page-wide, 15-row-high fold­out map of the DNA, with the loca­tion of each of more than 4,000 genes shown in vivid col­or. A com­plete list­ing of the more than 4 mil­lion base pairs — that long string of As, Ts, Cs, and Gs — is too volu­mi­nous to be includ­ed in the arti­cle; it is stored in com­put­er data bases that are avail­able to scientists.

The func­tion of each of the bac­teri­um’s genes is list­ed on the back of the gene map. It is a cat­a­log of pro­tein-build­ing most­ly — every­thing required for the life of Bacil­lus sub­tilis, from the trans­port of nutri­ents across the cell wall, to the pro­duc­tion and release of the spore that will ensure the next generation.

A sim­i­lar map of the human genome would be a 6,000-page-wide fold­out. A print­ed record of all 3 bil­lion base pairs in human DNA would fill more than a dozen sets of the Ency­clo­pe­dia Britannica.

A com­plete gene map and base-pair sequence of human DNA will be avail­able ear­ly in the 21st cen­tu­ry. This infor­ma­tion will have count­less sci­en­tif­ic uses, from help­ing to recon­struct the his­to­ry of life to aid­ing in the design of drugs that will extend life.

But the val­ue of the infor­ma­tion is more than sci­en­tif­ic. A map of the human DNA can touch us esthet­i­cal­ly and spir­i­tu­al­ly, in the same way that Michelan­gelo’s David serves as a defin­ing image of the human organism.

Of course, a gene map on the print­ed page, like Michelan­gelo’s stat­ue, is sta­t­ic, and only hints at the won­der­ful dynamism of the DNA mol­e­cule as it winds and unwinds, spin­ning off RNA and pro­teins, express­ing genes as they are need­ed by the liv­ing organ­ism, as if under the direc­tion of an invis­i­ble con­duc­tor — the mag­nif­i­cent and mirac­u­lous sym­pho­ny of life.

Mirac­u­lous? The British writer and car­tog­ra­ph­er Tim Robin­son says in one of his books that mir­a­cles are explain­able; it is the expla­na­tions that are mirac­u­lous. The mir­a­cle of gene expres­sion by DNA is explain­able, and the new gene maps of com­plete­ly sequenced organ­isms are a big part of the expla­na­tion. But that the essence of life should be so sim­ple — a four-let­ter code on a spi­ral stair­case — is pro­found­ly miraculous.

The more we learn about the chem­istry of life the more mirac­u­lous it seems, not in the sense of an arbi­trary vio­la­tion of the laws of nature, but in the rich poten­tial­i­ties of mat­ter itself.

I was look­ing at the gene map for Bacil­lus sub­tilis in the col­lege library, with the 8‑page fold­out spread across a table. Sev­er­al stu­dents stopped to look over my shoul­der, curi­ous as to what the col­or­ful chart might be.

This is the blue­print for mak­ing a liv­ing organ­ism,” I said. I start­ed to pro­vide a more com­plete expla­na­tion, but fell silent. The map spoke for itself. Ele­gant. Sim­ple. Unfath­omably profound.

Beau­ty bare.

Share this Musing: