America’s not-so-natural wonders

America’s not-so-natural wonders

The Grand Canyon (Not pictured: The elevator to the bottom) • Photo by Alan Carrillo on Unsplash

Originally published 3 April 1995

Nat­ur­al and arti­fi­cial are increas­ing­ly dif­fi­cult to distinguish.

We have syn­thet­ic food, syn­thet­ic fibers — even genet­i­cal­ly engi­neered mice and toma­toes. The clos­est many of us get to nature is a bare­foot romp on Astroturf.

We lev­el moun­tains, fill bays, oblit­er­ate forests, speck­le the heav­ens with mechan­i­cal stars.

Noth­ing, appar­ent­ly, is beyond our pow­ers of artifice.

Nev­er­the­less, I was unpre­pared for this pas­sage from his­to­ri­an David Nye’s new book, Amer­i­can Tech­no­log­i­cal Sublime.

He writes: “The char­ac­ter­is­tic ques­tions about the Grand Canyon report­ed by Park Ser­vice employ­ees assume that humans dug the canyon or that they could improve it so that it might be viewed quick­ly and eas­i­ly. Rangers report repeat­ed queries for direc­tions to the road, the ele­va­tor, the train, the bus, or the trol­ley to the bot­tom. Oth­er vis­i­tors request that the canyon be light­ed at night. Many assume that the canyon was pro­duced by one of the New Deal dam-build­ing pro­grams, or by the Indi­ans — ‘What tools did they use?’ is a com­mon question.”

Inspired by Nye’s report — and in the spir­it of ear­ly April — I offer the fol­low­ing guide to some of Amer­i­ca’s spec­tac­u­lar tech­no­log­i­cal achievements.

Nia­gara Falls. The falls had its ori­gin in the most colos­sal engi­neer­ing blun­der of all time.

In the ear­ly 1950s, the Unit­ed States and Cana­da agreed to improve the St. Lawrence Sea­way with a sys­tem of mon­u­men­tal canals, locks and water­ways pro­vid­ing pas­sage for large ves­sels from the upper Great Lakes to the Atlantic.

From the begin­ning, the project was ham­pered by wran­gling between Amer­i­can and Cana­di­an engi­neers. At last, in the Treaty of Moose Jaw, 1953, a com­pro­mise was reached: The Cana­di­ans would begin con­struc­tion of the water­way at Lake Supe­ri­or and work sea­ward; the Amer­i­cans would begin in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and work inland.

Com­mon spec­i­fi­ca­tions were agreed upon and con­struc­tion com­menced. All went smooth­ly, and the St. Lawrence Sea­way Project was offered as an exam­ple of felic­i­tous inter­na­tion­al col­lab­o­ra­tion. Even the fre­quent­ly-squab­bling French and Eng­lish were inspired by Amer­i­can-Cana­di­an coop­er­a­tion to fin­ish dig­ging the long-dreamed-of Eng­lish Channel.

Only when the two con­struc­tion teams met between Lakes Erie and Ontario did the blun­der become appar­ent. The Amer­i­cans had inter­pret­ed all plan dimen­sions in feet; the Cana­di­ans, of course, had worked in meters. The result was a 326-foot dis­crep­an­cy between the lev­els of the Amer­i­can and Cana­di­an canals.

Each side blamed the oth­er for the error.

Today, water pours over that frac­tious precipice, to the delight of tourists.

Old Faith­ful. South Dakotans have always been embar­rassed by the drea­ry flat­ness of their state. For gen­er­a­tions they were reduced to sell­ing tacky gim­cracks to tourists pass­ing through on their way to the majes­tic moun­tains of Wyoming. A lump of gran­ite named Mt. Rush­more was the best South Dakotans could offer in competition.

Then they had the bril­liant idea of carv­ing into Mt. Rush­more the gran­ite like­ness­es of Amer­i­can pres­i­dents. The tourists lin­gered and spent mon­ey that pre­vi­ous­ly had stayed in their pock­ets until they reached Wyoming.

Not to be out­done, Wyomin­gites con­trived a tourist attrac­tion of their own, a stu­pen­dous geyser near a pop­u­lar Yel­low­stone Park hotel.

A vis­it to the under­ground geyser works is not to be missed. Gleam­ing steel boil­ers are heat­ed by geot­her­mal ener­gy from the ground until suf­fi­cient pres­sure builds up, trips a release valve, and noz­zles a stream of water high into the air.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the aver­age recharge time for the nat­u­ral­ly-heat­ed boil­ers is 65 min­utes, where­as it takes only 27 min­utes to park, unload and re-load a tourist bus. Mod­i­fi­ca­tions are under way to con­vert the geyser works from geot­her­mal to elec­tri­cal heat, per­haps not as faith­ful, but cer­tain­ly faster.

Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er. It seems impos­si­ble to believe that just 60 years ago vast tracts of the cen­tral Unit­ed States were a dust bowl. Farm­ers were forced to pack their Model‑T Fords with their world­ly goods and head west to the lush­er val­leys of California.

Franklin Delano Roo­sevelt changed this forever.

In 1934, at the height of the Great Depres­sion, he estab­lished the Heart­land Amer­i­ca Hydro Author­i­ty to irri­gate the parched mid­lands and cre­ate jobs. The Army Corps of Engi­neers was charged with divert­ing north­ern rivers southward.

Like most New Deal enter­pris­es, the irri­ga­tion project grew like Top­sy. More and more water was chan­neled south until a vast new riv­er bisect­ed the nation. The project came to an end only when the cit­i­zens of New Orleans refused to sur­ren­der any more land to the wide chan­nel the engi­neers had dri­ven through the heart of their city.

A pro­pos­al to call the water­way the Roo­sevelt Riv­er foundered in the recal­ci­trant Con­gress of 1940. Instead, it was named the Mis­sis­sip­pi, after the fic­tion­al water­way of Mark Twain’s novels.

It is curi­ous that the new Repub­li­can agen­da, which seeks to undo so much New Deal leg­is­la­tion, makes no men­tion of restor­ing the Mis­sis­sip­pi Val­ley to its for­mer unwa­tered state.

Share this Musing: