Adam, Badam, bo-Badam

Adam, Badam, bo-Badam

Composite image of the four Galilean moons of Jupiter • NASA/JPL/DLR

Originally published 6 July 1998

Leg­end has it that Adam was allowed by the Cre­ator to name all the crea­tures of the Earth.

A daunt­ing task! Accord­ing to biol­o­gists, there may 100 mil­lion liv­ing organ­isms. That means if Adam thought up a name a minute for 16 hours a day (Sun­days exclud­ed), it would take him hun­dreds of years to com­plete his job.

One can assume that he began with a basic vocab­u­lary and then impro­vised. For exam­ple, it is easy to see how he came up with “duck” for the aquat­ic bird that dips its head under water; he already had “duck” the verb, mean­ing “to dip quickly.”

Duck-billed platy­pus” would have then been a cinch for the flat- snout­ed, flat-foot­ed semi-aquat­ic egg-lay­ing mam­mal. “Platy­pus” means “flat-foot­ed” in Greek, and we can assume that Adam knew his Greek. (Was this before Babel? Oh, well, we are being whim­si­cal, let it pass.)

And so it went, decade after decade, cen­tu­ry after cen­tu­ry, until Adam could look about him and speak the name of every creature.

It’s a love­ly sto­ry, and pro­vides a sort of answer to the ques­tion that puz­zles every child: How do things get their names? Every place, every plant, and ani­mal: Some­where, some­time, some­body came up with a tag.

What about heav­en­ly bod­ies? Who named the plan­ets and stars?

Sir­ius, the bright­est star in the sky, has its name from a Greek word for “scorch­ing.” “Betel­geuse” may derive from an Ara­bic con­struc­tion for “armpit,” and refers to the star’s place in the con­stel­la­tion Ori­on. Who first applied these names? No one knows.

The Romans named the plan­et Mer­cury after the speedy mes­sen­ger of the gods, because it moved so quick­ly in its track. The plan­et Venus was named after the god­dess of love because it was con­sid­ered the most beau­ti­ful of heav­en­ly bodies.

Mars was called for the god of war because of its blood-red col­or. When the plan­et’s two tiny moons were dis­cov­ered by Asaph Hall in the late 19th cen­tu­ry, he gave them the names of the mytho­log­i­cal steeds who drew the war god’s char­i­ot: Pho­bos and Deimos.

The plan­et Jupiter took its name from the chief god of the Roman pan­theon, which turned out to be appro­pri­ate, since we now know that Jupiter is the largest and most mas­sive plan­et in the solar system.

In the win­ter of 1610-11, Galileo observed that Jupiter had four moons. He named them the Medi­cian Stars, after his patron Cosi­mo II de’ Medici, and dis­tin­guished them with Roman numer­als. The Ger­man astronomer Simon Mar­ius claimed (unsuc­cess­ful­ly) to have dis­cov­ered Jupiter’s moons before Galileo; in 1613 he pro­posed nam­ing the Jov­ian satel­lites Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Cal­lis­to after four of Jupiter’s illic­it loves. These names stuck.

Sub­se­quent­ly, a dozen small­er Jov­ian moons were dis­cov­ered. Some of these also bear names of the randy deity’s illic­it paramours.

The space age has giv­en a mighty boost to the name game. The geo­gra­phies of plan­ets, moons, and even aster­oids of our solar sys­tem have now been explored, with their craters, moun­tains, val­leys, rills, and plains. Astronomers have been thrust into the posi­tion of poor old Adam, who had to come up with more names than might seem possible.

The Inter­na­tion­al Astro­nom­i­cal Union has adopt­ed cer­tain nomen­cla­ture guide­lines to avoid chaos. In gen­er­al, it requires that nam­ing schemes estab­lished ear­ly in the his­to­ry of astron­o­my be con­tin­ued. For exam­ple, lunar fea­tures must be Latin or Greek, Uran­ian moons are named for char­ac­ters from Shake­speare and Pope, the names of Nep­tune’s satel­lites have a watery theme.

To avoid con­tro­ver­sy, no names hav­ing a polit­i­cal, mil­i­tary, or reli­gious sig­nif­i­cance are allowed. Per­sons being hon­ored must have been deceased for at least three years before his or her name can be attached to a fea­ture, except in the case of liv­ing astro­nauts or cosmonauts.

And so on.

Con­sid­er, for exam­ple, the task faced by astronomers attempt­ing to assim­i­late the wealth of geo­graph­i­cal detail recent­ly observed by the Galileo space­craft on just one of Jupiter’s moons: Europa.

By agree­ment, names of most fea­tures will be drawn from Celtic mythol­o­gy. Craters will be named for Celtic gods and heroes, large ring fea­tures after Celtic stone cir­cles, plains after places asso­ci­at­ed with Celtic myths.

Clear­ly, not even the rich­ness of Celtic myth will be suf­fi­cient to des­ig­nate every fea­ture of Euro­pean geog­ra­phy that will be observed dur­ing future explo­rations. At some point, the offi­cial­ly sanc­tioned nam­ing scheme will break down and space explor­ers will lapse into Adam mode, cob­bling togeth­er what­ev­er names work — the geo­graph­i­cal equiv­a­lents of duck-billed platypus.

We live in a uni­verse of inex­haustible diver­si­ty, but behind the diver­si­ty there are a finite num­ber of mate­r­i­al par­ti­cles and order­ing prin­ci­ples out of which the world is made. That’s why sci­ence is pos­si­ble. Like­wise, lan­guage has a finite num­ber of root mean­ings and order­ing prin­ci­ples that can be com­bined in an inex­haustible num­ber of ways. And that’s why it’s pos­si­ble to come up with a name for every fea­ture of the world.

Share this Musing: