A mixed legacy

A mixed legacy

Buzz Aldrin on the moon • NASA / Neil A. Armstrong

Originally published 17 July 1989

Where were you at 4:17 p.m., on Sun­day, July 20, 1969?

It was the sum­mer of Wood­stock and Chap­paquid­dick. The Six-Day War and Hur­ri­cane Camille. The Charles Man­son mur­ders and the Sex­u­al Revolution.

The best-sell­ing books were Jacque­line Susan­n’s Love Machine and Philip Roth’s Port­noy’s Com­plaint. Blood, Sweat & Tears had the top album; “Spin­ning Wheel” was their run-away sin­gle. Top gross­ing films were The April Fools and True Grit.

John Wayne and Elvis were still on earth, and two Amer­i­can astro­nauts were on the moon. The words flashed from the sur­face of the moon to the NASA anten­na at Hon­ey­suck­le Creek near Can­ber­ra, Aus­tralia, then to the Com­sat satel­lite over the Pacif­ic and around the world: “Hous­ton, Tran­quil­i­ty Base here. The Eagle has landed.”

Dur­ing the sum­mer of 1969 I was tour­ing Europe in a Volk­swa­gen camper with my spouse and three young kids. On the after­noon of July 20 we drove into Copen­hagen and tried unsuc­cess­ful­ly to find a hotel with a tele­vi­sion. At the moment Eagle touched down on the dusty sur­face of the moon we were stand­ing on a side­walk out­side a tele­vi­sion shop with a crowd of itin­er­ants, most­ly young Amer­i­cans with back­packs. Beyond the plate glass win­dow, on the flick­er­ing screens of a dozen TV sets, his­to­ry was in the mak­ing. A great cheer went up, a cheer of nation­al pride, but more than that — for it was­n’t just Amer­i­cans cheer­ing — it was a cheer of pride for a great tri­umph of human imagination.

A tumultuous decade

The sum­mer of ’69. The end of a tumul­tuous decade. The best of times and the worst of times. A time of glo­ry and a time of shame. Inau­gu­ra­tion and assas­si­na­tion. Camelot and My Lai. Mar­i­an Ander­son on the steps of the Lin­coln Memo­r­i­al and the bul­let-torn body of Mar­tin Luther King on a motel bal­cony in Mem­phis. It was a time when an ancient fab­ric of soci­ety began to unrav­el, and a time when blacks, women, envi­ron­men­tal­ists, and anti-war activists strug­gled might­i­ly to knit a new fab­ric to replace the old.

Today we look back 20 years and try to eval­u­ate what hap­pened dur­ing the decade of the Six­ties. Some see it as a time of lib­er­a­tion; oth­ers as a time of chaos. And what of Project Apol­lo, the great­est sci­en­tif­ic and tech­no­log­i­cal achieve­ment of the cen­tu­ry, per­haps of all time? What is the lega­cy of Apollo?

On the evening of July 20, 1969, I made a spe­cial effort to put my kids in front of a tele­vi­sion set because I believed that what they would see was of epic impor­tance. Now the flight of Apol­lo 11 has fad­ed from their mem­o­ry, and even from their con­scious­ness. If they were asked to list the his­toric events of the Six­ties they might men­tion the music of the Bea­t­les, the assas­si­na­tion of John Kennedy, and the Viet­nam War. The land­ing on the moon is forgotten.

Even in my own mind the flights of Apol­lo seems unre­al. Were they some­thing that real­ly hap­pened, or some­thing imag­ined? Those stun­ning images – the Amer­i­can flag reflect­ed in the visor of Buzz Aldrin’s space hel­met, the foot­prints in moon dust, Eugene Cer­nan dri­ving the Rover, geol­o­gist Har­ri­son Schmitt dwarfed by a lunar boul­der, the blue-white plan­et Earth ris­ing on the hori­zon — are like scenes from a vague­ly remem­bered movie, or snap­shots from some­one else’s fam­i­ly album.

The June/July [1989] issue of the Smith­so­ni­an’s Air & Space mag­a­zine is devot­ed to a look-back at Apol­lo. It is a provoca­tive issue that forces us to con­front the real mean­ing of the adventure.

Not least among the lessons of this ret­ro­spec­tive look at Apol­lo is the dis­cov­ery that “the giant leap for mankind” was a fluke, a one-shot, nev­er-to-be-repeat­ed, feel-good stunt, a space Wood­stock. The motive for going to the moon was polit­i­cal, a counter to Sput­nik and Yuri Gagarin, a ploy in the bat­tle of the super­pow­ers for the hearts and minds of peoples.

Faced with a dilemma

Kennedy was­n’t ter­ri­bly excit­ed about doing it,” recalled Jerome Wies­ner, JFK’s chief sci­ence advi­sor (in an Air & Space arti­cle by Wayne Bid­dle); “but he was faced with a dilemma…The pres­sure on him was enor­mous from the pub­lic. He used to press me, say­ing, ‘Can’t you find some­thing to do here on Earth that would use the mon­ey more effec­tive­ly?’ And I said, ‘Not with the same polit­i­cal effect.’ ”

The goal was lim­it­ed. “Get there, pick up some rocks, come home,” is how Bid­dle puts it. By 1972, after six suc­cess­ful moon land­ings, it was time to cut and run. The polit­i­cal agen­da was com­plete; the epic human under­tak­ing was rel­e­gat­ed — by the politi­cians, per­haps by the cit­i­zens them­selves — to the trash heap of history.

Twen­ty years after Christo­pher Colum­bus “touched down” in the Bahamas, Europe and the Amer­i­c­as had been irre­versibly trans­formed, for good and bad. Twen­ty years after the Apol­lo land­ing on the moon, the episode is most­ly for­got­ten — a sci-tech extrav­a­gan­za in the ser­vice of super­pow­er com­pe­ti­tion, a bril­liant­ly-exe­cut­ed Camelot pageant.

How­ev­er we eval­u­ate the lega­cy of Apol­lo, this much is clear. The day will come — per­haps in decades, per­haps in a cen­tu­ry — when flight to the moon will be com­mon­place. Tran­quil­i­ty Base will be vis­it­ed as a his­toric shrine of space explo­ration, as today we vis­it Ply­mouth Rock.

It will all still be there, the detri­tus of the mir­a­cle: the Eagle’s descent stage, a TV cam­era and tri­pod, an array of sci­en­tif­ic instru­ments, an equip­ment bag with cam­eras and tools, two life sup­port sys­tems, a gold olive branch sym­bol­iz­ing peace, the US flag unfurled on its staff, the foot­prints in the dust.

Share this Musing: