A magnetic display

A magnetic display

Photo by Vincent Guth on Unsplash

Originally published 5 March 1984

On the evening of Sep­tem­ber 30, 1961, observers in the north­east­ern Unit­ed States were treat­ed to a spec­tac­u­lar dis­play of north­ern lights — the auro­ra bore­alis. It was the first I wit­nessed (I grew up in the south) and remains the best show of the lights I have seen.

The auro­ra that night went on for hours. The north­west­ern hori­zon was hung with shim­mer­ing green cur­tains. The lumi­nous drap­ery wavered and fold­ed upon itself as if moved by a gen­tle wind. Near the zenith a 4th of July fire­works show was under way. Stream­ers and star­bursts of red and green light streaked the sky.

The source of these pyrotech­nics was the sun. Two days ear­li­er a mas­sive flare was record­ed on the face of the sun by observers at solar obser­va­to­ries. With­in min­utes, a dark fil­a­ment embed­ded in the sun’s sur­face explod­ed into blaz­ing sheets of flame, loop­ing up into the solar atmos­phere and tear­ing away into space. The flare blast­ed into space an enor­mous flux of charged par­ti­cles — pro­tons and elec­trons most­ly — with veloc­i­ties over a mil­lion miles per hour. When those par­ti­cles col­lid­ed with atoms and mol­e­cules in the Earth­’s upper atmos­phere, they caused the air to glow.

Par­tic­u­lar­ly vio­lent solar flares excite the most spec­tac­u­lar dis­plays of auro­ral lights. But even in less vio­lent moments the sun throws off a stream of sub­atom­ic par­ti­cles called the solar wind. Life on the sur­face of the Earth is shel­tered from this poten­tial­ly harm­ful breeze by the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field.

Most of the wind of charged par­ti­cles from the sun is deflect­ed by the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field and flows harm­less­ly around the plan­et like water around a rock in a stream. Some of the more ener­getic par­ti­cles pen­e­trate the mag­net­ic shield and spi­ral in along lines of mag­net­ic force to col­lide with the atmos­phere in high north­ern and south­ern lat­i­tudes. Almost all of these suc­cess­ful intrud­ers are stopped by the atmos­phere, ignit­ing the auro­ral lights. Only the most ener­getic par­ti­cles reach the sur­face of the Earth, and most of these come to the ground in polar regions where life is sparse.

Reversal of the field

Sev­er­al decades ago Earth sci­en­tists became aware of an unex­pect­ed fea­ture of the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field: at unpre­dictable inter­vals, typ­i­cal­ly sev­er­al times every mil­lion years, the field revers­es. North mag­net­ic pole becomes south pole and vice ver­sa. Dur­ing a rever­sal, a com­pass nee­dle would swing around and point the oth­er way.

In fact, Uni­ver­si­ty of Min­neso­ta geo­physi­cists Subir Baner­jee and Don­ald Sprowl have recent­ly report­ed that the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field has decreased in strength more than 50 per­cent in the last 4,000 years — a decrease that could indi­cate the begin­ning of a rever­sal of the Earth­’s mag­net­ic poles.

While geo­physi­cists do not yet under­stand what caus­es the bizarre flip-flops of the Earth­’s field, geol­o­gists study­ing the mag­net­ic ori­en­ta­tion of rock in the sea floor have dis­cov­ered as many as 12 field rever­sals in the last 9 mil­lion years, the last one occur­ring 710,000 years ago.

The turn­abouts are not instan­ta­neous. The field slow­ly col­laps­es and builds up again with the oppo­site polar­i­ty. A rever­sal may take ten or twen­ty thou­sand years. For a peri­od of sev­er­al thou­sand years the plan­et is effec­tive­ly with­out a mag­net­ic field!

If there are long inter­vals when the Earth is mag­net­i­cal­ly naked before the solar wind, might not plants and ani­mals feel the brunt of the celes­tial bombardment?

The fos­sil record holds tan­ta­liz­ing hints that polar­i­ty rever­sals might affect the course of evo­lu­tion. In one study, J.D. Hays of the Lam­ont-Doher­ty Earth Obser­va­to­ry exam­ined radi­o­lar­ia in 28 drill sam­ples of sea-floor sed­i­ments brought up from the floor of the Pacif­ic. Radi­o­lar­ia are one-celled marine organ­isms that secrete del­i­cate and beau­ti­ful­ly fil­i­greed skele­tons of sil­i­ca. Hays found eight species of radi­o­lar­ia that became extinct with­in the past 2.5 mil­lion years. Of the eight, six species dis­ap­peared from the sed­i­ments at the time of polar­i­ty rever­sals. Oth­er stud­ies of microor­gan­isms in sea-floor sed­i­ments have tend­ed to con­firm Hays’ work.

How living things are affected

At least five mech­a­nisms have been pro­posed to explain how the col­lapse of the Earth­’s mag­net­ic umbrel­la could have con­se­quences for life.

The most obvi­ous dan­ger is the direct bom­bard­ment of exposed organ­isms by the solar wind (and by cos­mic rays from space). The bom­bard­ment might pro­duce genet­ic dam­age that leads to the extinc­tion of species. It turns out that this is unlike­ly. Even in the absence of the mag­net­ic field, the Earth­’s atmos­phere should pro­vide a rea­son­ably effec­tive shield against incom­ing particles.

A sec­ond pro­pos­al links polar­i­ty rever­sals with geo­log­i­cal activ­i­ty in the Earth­’s upper man­tle. Accord­ing to this idea, inter­nal tur­bu­lence that trig­gers spasms of sur­face vol­canic activ­i­ty is also the trig­ger for a polar­i­ty rever­sal. In this sce­nario, it is dust thrown into the atmos­phere by mas­sive vol­canic erup­tions that cause evo­lu­tion­ary chaos. Mag­net­ic rever­sals are not the cause of the extinc­tions, only a coin­ci­dent effect. Some cau­tious evi­dence has been offered to show that some past episodes of intense vol­canic activ­i­ty were in fact coin­ci­dent with polar­i­ty reversals.

Polar­i­ty flip-flops might cause a change in cli­mate. When the Earth is with­out its mag­net­ic sheath, incom­ing charged par­ti­cles increase ion­iza­tion (atoms stripped of elec­trons) in the upper atmos­phere. Ion­iza­tion seems to enhance high alti­tude cloud cov­er. Cloud cov­er mod­i­fies cli­mate. Dras­tic cli­mat­ic change might lead to the extinc­tion of cer­tain life forms.

A fourth the­o­ry relates the col­lapse of the Earth­’s mag­net­ic field to a deple­tion of the ozone lay­er. An increase in the lev­el of ion­iza­tion in the stratos­phere encour­ages chem­i­cal reac­tions that lead to dimin­ish­ing ozone lev­els. This in turn expos­es the sur­face of the Earth to poten­tial­ly harm­ful ultra­vi­o­let radi­a­tion from the sun.

A last expla­na­tion for extinc­tions dur­ing rever­sals locates the source of the trou­ble with­in the bod­ies of liv­ing crea­tures. In recent years sub­stances respon­sive to mag­net­ic fields have been found in ani­mals as diverse as bac­te­ria, mol­luscs, mud snails, hon­ey bees, but­ter­flies, pigeons and dol­phins. These inter­nal “com­pass­es” seem to play a role in nav­i­ga­tion. A flop of the field could cause dan­ger­ous dis­ori­en­ta­tions. Bac­te­ria, for exam­ple, might find them­selves swim­ming toward the sur­face of a pond rather than the mud­dy bottom.

Future research will decide the extent to which life is in jeop­ardy dur­ing mag­net­ic polar­i­ty rever­sals, and by what mech­a­nisms the rever­sals take their toll.

It has now been sev­en hun­dred thou­sand years since the last polar­i­ty change, con­sid­er­ably longer than the aver­age inter­val between rever­sals. In the not so dis­tant future life may once again find itself exposed before the solar wind.

In the mean­time, the beau­ti­ful auro­ral lights are a healthy sign that the plan­et’s mag­net­ic field and atmos­phere are doing their job, pro­tect­ing life on Earth from a poten­tial dan­ger from the sun.

Share this Musing: