A gentler scientist

A gentler scientist

The wings of a Rhagoletis fly mimics a spider's legs • © entomart (Used with permission)

Originally published 4 May 1987

Among the books I remem­ber best from child­hood was Jean-Hen­ri Fab­re’s Insect Adven­tures, sto­ries trans­lat­ed from the volu­mi­nous works of the great 19th cen­tu­ry French ento­mol­o­gist and retold for young readers.

Not much retelling was nec­es­sary. All of Fab­re’s books are delight­ful­ly and sim­ply writ­ten, and pop­u­lar with read­ers of all ages. They remain, after a cen­tu­ry, the best and most engag­ing intro­duc­tion to the world of insects. I am not the only per­son who was nudged toward the study of sci­ence by read­ing one of Fab­re’s books.

Fab­re made bugs — ordi­nary bugs of the house­hold and gar­den — as excit­ing as the great beasts of the African veld. He told sto­ries of their nest­ings and mat­ings, their lan­guages and soci­eties, and their roles as preda­tors and prey, all based on his own care­ful observations.

But in spite of his pop­u­lar suc­cess, Fab­re was nev­er made a wel­come mem­ber of the sci­en­tif­ic com­mu­ni­ty. His folksy, lit­er­ary prose style was resent­ed by his fel­low ento­mol­o­gists. They were fur­ther put off by his resis­tance to dis­sec­tion and lab­o­ra­to­ry exper­i­ments. Stymied in his career, Fab­re nev­er advanced beyond an assis­tant pro­fes­sor­ship at a tiny salary.

Fabre’s way

Fab­re believed that the meth­ods of sci­ence must be con­sis­tent with our motives for know­ing. His method was to enter as inti­mate­ly as pos­si­ble into the lives of the crea­tures he stud­ied. His lab­o­ra­to­ry was the field. “I make my obser­va­tions under the blue sky,” he wrote, “to the song of the Cicada.”

Two arti­cles in last week’s issue of Sci­ence brought Fab­re to mind. The arti­cles were inter­est­ing both for what they report­ed about insects, and as instruc­tive exam­ples of sci­en­tif­ic method.

Both reports describe flies that have evolved phys­i­cal fea­tures and behav­iors that let them mim­ic their chief preda­tors, the jump­ing spi­ders. The flies’ wings are band­ed with stripes that resem­ble the legs of the spi­ders. When threat­ened, the flies wig­gle their wings so as to mim­ic the spi­der’s move­ment and gait. Pre­sum­ably, the point of this lit­tle ruse is to avoid being eaten.

Mim­ic­ry is not unusu­al in the world of insects. Insects have evolved with body shapes and col­ors that mim­ic flow­ers, twigs, leaves, peb­bles, oth­er insects, and even bird-drop­pings, the bet­ter to escape detec­tion by preda­tors. The sort of mim­ic­ry described in the two Sci­ence arti­cles, where the prey mim­ics the preda­tor (a “sheep in wolf’s cloth­ing”), has been only rarely reported.

In the first of the two reports, researchers at Simon Fras­er Uni­ver­si­ty in British Colum­bia describe exper­i­ments with snow­ber­ry flies. The preda­tor, a jump­ing spi­der, was admit­ted into a Plex­i­glas “are­na.” With­in the are­na, a snow­ber­ry fly was con­fined under a clear glass dome and the spi­der’s response was observed.

As expect­ed, the spi­der respond­ed to the mim­ic fly as if it were anoth­er spi­der. The exper­i­ments were repeat­ed with jump­ing spi­ders under the dome, with ordi­nary house flies, and with snow­ber­ry flies whose wing stripes were oblit­er­at­ed with a mark­ing pen. The spi­ders acknowl­edged the oth­er spi­ders in a spi­dery fash­ion, but behaved aggres­sive­ly toward house flies and the snow­ber­ry flies that had been deprived of their disguise.

Crafty mimics

The sec­ond report, by three Amer­i­can researchers, describes exper­i­ments with anoth­er species of fly (Zonose­ma­ta) with leg-like mark­ings on its wings and false eye­spots on its abdomen that mim­ic a jump­ing spi­der. Five types of “prey” were intro­duced into the com­pa­ny of hun­gry spi­ders: 1) Nor­mal Zonose­ma­ta; 2) Zonose­ma­ta whose leg-band­ed wings had been cut off and replaced (using Elmer’s glue) with the wings of ordi­nary house­flies; 3) Zonose­ma­ta whose wings were replaced with the wings of oth­er Zonose­ma­ta; 4) ordi­nary house­flies; and 5) house­flies equipped with glued-on Zonose­ma­ta wings.

The spi­ders acknowl­edged Zonose­ma­ta—with their own wings or the wings of anoth­er Zonose­ma­ta—in friend­ly fash­ion, and behaved aggres­sive­ly toward all oth­er cat­e­gories of prey. Both leg stripes and dis­tinc­tive wing move­ments were nec­es­sary to fool the spi­ders. Preda­tors oth­er than spi­ders attacked Zonose­ma­ta as read­i­ly as any oth­er prey. Appar­ent­ly, Zonose­mata’s mim­ic­ry has evolved as a spe­cif­ic deter­rent to attack by jump­ing spiders.

Jean-Hen­ri Fab­re would have been fas­ci­nat­ed to hear of these mim­ic flies, wav­ing their false legs and try­ing for dear life to look like jump­ing spi­ders. But I sus­pect he would have been less enchant­ed with the Plex­i­glas are­na, mark­ing pen, scalpel, and Elmer’s glue.

He would cer­tain­ly have con­sid­ered the tiny decep­tions of the mim­ic flies as one more remark­able insect adven­ture, to be patient­ly observed and exhaus­tive­ly described, even if nev­er ful­ly under­stood. He wore him­self out dis­cov­er­ing the secrets of insects, on his knees in the grass, ears alert to the Cicada’s song.

Share this Musing: